-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement ECDSA keymgmt and signatures #58
Conversation
@@ -5,7 +5,8 @@ use crate::openssl_bindings::*; | |||
use crate::{ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: Commit description should say changed to an ECDSA function.
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you tell me the SHA of the commit or the title?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the description is clear enough. It does not change to a function, but rather it just says that it uses a new implementation table for ECDSA. What do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right
Copy RSA's implementation table and use it for ECDSA. Each function in that implementation table will be sequentially changed to an RSA function. Signed-off-by: Tomás González <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tomás González <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tomás González <[email protected]>
bede2d2
to
a526c7e
Compare
db30df1
to
e0caa84
Compare
f3825f8
to
ac2a1b0
Compare
4d5fc77
to
0582828
Compare
As EcPoint does not implement the clone trait, the current implementation of keymgmt duplication does not work. Signed-off-by: Tomás González <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tomás González <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tomás González <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tomás González <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tomás González <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tomás González <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tomás González <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tomás González <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tomás González <[email protected]>
0582828
to
de67475
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
No description provided.