Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Add YCSB-A, B, D, E, and F workloads #65

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 13, 2025
Merged

Conversation

pzittlau
Copy link
Contributor

@pzittlau pzittlau commented Jan 9, 2025

This pull request introduces implementations for the YCSB-A, B, D, E, and F workloads, complementing the existing YCSB-C benchmark.

Summary of Changes:

  • Implemented YCSB-A (50% read, 50% update, zipfian distribution)
  • Implemented YCSB-B (95% read, 5% update, zipfian distribution)
  • Implemented YCSB-D (95% read, 5% insert, latest distribution)
  • Implemented YCSB-E (95% scan, 5% insert, zipfian/uniform distribution)
  • Implemented YCSB-F (50% read, 50% read-modify-write, zipfian distribution)
  • Added some documentation to for details of the workloads

Additional Notes:

  • Each workload is configurable with respect to the number of worker threads, runtime, and data size.
  • The version to run can be specified in run.sh

@fia0 fia0 self-requested a review January 13, 2025 13:27
Copy link
Contributor

@fia0 fia0 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes look good, I've pushed a drop cache before measurements begin onto your branch to make the measurements more reliable when they are performed one after another during the 1..=workers loop, the weighting in the zipfian distribution might skew results otherwise.

@fia0 fia0 merged commit 03effd6 into parcio:main Jan 13, 2025
7 of 8 checks passed
@pzittlau pzittlau deleted the ycsb branch January 15, 2025 06:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants