feat: introducing chain processors #47
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Sounds like a nice idea! |
chr-hertel
force-pushed
the
feat-introduce-processor
branch
from
d4ca557 to
f64bb0e
Compare
|
works now, but need to think about it ... |
OskarStark
reviewed
Sep 25, 2024
chr-hertel
force-pushed
the
feat-introduce-processor
branch
from
f64bb0e to
46b71aa
Compare
chr-hertel
force-pushed
the
feat-introduce-processor
branch
from
46b71aa to
ff58c37
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Idea to decouple functionality and extension points for chain - not working yet though
WDYT?