Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Desktop_293 #35

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 23, 2025
Merged

Desktop_293 #35

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 23, 2025

Conversation

Chayma-ab
Copy link
Collaborator

@Chayma-ab Chayma-ab commented Jan 20, 2025

Selecting a polygon while viewing a route, then going back to navigation mode gives inconsistent results

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Enhanced navigation stages with dynamic route message rendering
    • Improved search functionality with expanded state management
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated component interaction and state handling for better user experience
  • Chores

    • Version bump to 0.16.110-pqview-merge
    • Added dist directory to .gitignore
  • Documentation

    • Refined component logic and interaction descriptions

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 20, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

My fellow developers, today we are witnessing a series of strategic updates across our project infrastructure. These changes span multiple files, including .gitignore, package.json, and key Vue components like BasicNavStages.vue and BasicSide.vue. The modifications enhance our application's state management, navigation capabilities, and version tracking, reflecting our commitment to continuous improvement and precision in software development.

Changes

File Change Summary
.gitignore Added dist directory to ignored files
package.json Version bumped from 0.16.75-pqview to 0.16.110-pqview-merge
src/components/BasicNavStages.vue Introduced dynamic route stage rendering, added new methods and data properties for enhanced navigation
src/components/BasicSide.vue Updated search functionality, added Vuex state management methods
test/basic.test.js Simplified component specification file assertion logic

Poem

Let code evolve, let changes flow
From .gitignore to Vuex's glow 🌟
Components dance, tests refine
Progress marches, line by line 🚀
Yes, we can - improve today! 💻


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@Chayma-ab Chayma-ab changed the base branch from main to PQView January 20, 2025 13:43
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Caution

Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.

Actionable comments posted: 8

🛑 Comments failed to post (8)
test/basic.test.js (1)

24-24: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

My fellow Americans, let me be clear about improving our code readability.

Let me tell you why we need to make this change. You see, template literals aren't just about syntax - they're about making our code more accessible and maintainable for all Americans who contribute to this great project.

Here's what we propose:

-      expect(exists ? cm : 'not-found:' + specfile).equal(cm)
+      expect(exists ? cm : `not-found:${specfile}`).equal(cm)
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

      expect(exists ? cm : `not-found:${specfile}`).equal(cm)
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 24-24: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.

Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.

(lint/style/useTemplate)

src/components/BasicSide.vue (4)

360-364: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Let me be clear about our code hygiene.

We have several blocks of commented-out code that should be removed if they're no longer needed. This includes the path data retrieval code and the old toggleSearch2 method.

Remove these commented-out code blocks to improve code maintainability.

Also applies to: 520-522


721-725: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Now, let me address this styling situation.

The z-index value of 99999 is unnecessarily high and could cause issues with other overlapping elements in the future.

I recommend adjusting this to a more reasonable value:

    .v-divider {
        position: absolute;
-       z-index: 99999;
+       z-index: 10;
        left: -11px;
        width: 100%;
        bottom: 52px;
    }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

        position: absolute;
        z-index: 10;
        left: -11px;
        width: 100%;
        bottom: 52px;

148-150: ⚠️ Potential issue

My fellow Americans, let me be clear about this close button implementation.

The button appears to be missing its icon content, which could leave our users confused about its purpose.

Let me propose this change to ensure proper functionality:

-        <button @click="showSearch2 = false" style="">
-          <v-icon style="font-size: 12px !important;bottom: 78px;right: calc(100% - 250px);background-color: #dbe9f5;border-radius: 6px;color: #283348;" ></v-icon>
-        </button>
+        <button @click="showSearch2 = false" class="close-nav-btn">
+          <v-icon style="font-size: 12px !important;bottom: 78px;right: calc(100% - 250px);background-color: #dbe9f5;border-radius: 6px;color: #283348;">mdi-close</v-icon>
+        </button>
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

        <button @click="showSearch2 = false" class="close-nav-btn">
          <v-icon style="font-size: 12px !important;bottom: 78px;right: calc(100% - 250px);background-color: #dbe9f5;border-radius: 6px;color: #283348;">mdi-close</v-icon>
        </button>

529-533: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Let me be straight with you about this navigation mode handler.

The handleNavigationMode function sets showSearch2 but doesn't handle cleanup of previous selections or state. This could lead to the very issue mentioned in the PR objectives where polygon selection state persists incorrectly.

I propose we enhance this implementation:

    handleNavigationMode(){
      console.log('Trigger select:', this.triggerSelect);
+     // Clear any existing selections before entering navigation mode
+     this.$store.dispatch('vxg_trigger_clear');
      this.showSearch2 = true
-      //this.$store.dispatch('vxg_trigger_clear');
+     this.toggleExpansion();
    },
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    handleNavigationMode(){
      console.log('Trigger select:', this.triggerSelect);
      // Clear any existing selections before entering navigation mode
      this.$store.dispatch('vxg_trigger_clear');
      this.showSearch2 = true
      this.toggleExpansion();
    },
src/components/BasicNavStages.vue (2)

2-2: ⚠️ Potential issue

Let's correct 'routeMassages' to 'routeMessages' for clarity.

Folks, I've noticed that throughout the code, the variable routeMassages is used. It seems there might be a small typo, and you intended to use routeMessages. Correcting this will enhance readability and prevent any potential confusion.

Here's the suggested change:

- routeMassages
+ routeMessages

Also applies to: 23-27, 55-55


148-156: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Uncomment or remove the unused mutation in selectStage method.

Now, in the selectStage method, there's a line that's been commented out:

//this.$store.commit('setMapIndex', index);

If setMapIndex is no longer needed, consider removing it entirely. If it's essential for updating the store, let's uncomment it to ensure the state is correctly managed.

Apply this diff accordingly:

- //this.$store.commit('setMapIndex', index);
+ this.$store.commit('setMapIndex', index);
package.json (1)

33-70: 💡 Codebase verification

My fellow developers, let me be clear about our dependency situation

Look, we've got some security vulnerabilities that we need to address. Our ESLint version 6 is vulnerable to a moderate severity Regular Expression Denial of Service attack. And yes, while our Vue 2.6.12 has a low-severity vulnerability, there's a patch version 2.7.16 available that we should consider.

Let me lay out a clear path forward:

  • Upgrade ESLint beyond 4.18.2 to address the security vulnerability
  • Consider upgrading Vue to 2.7.16 for the latest security patches
  • Hold off on the Vuetify 3.x upgrade until we're ready for Vue 3

Now, I want to emphasize that these are all development dependencies, but as I've always said, the security of our development pipeline is just as important as the security of our production code.

🔗 Analysis chain

Now, let me be straight with you about these dependencies.

My fellow developers, I've noticed several dependencies that require our attention. Vue 2.6.12, Vuetify 2.5.1, and ESLint 6 are getting a bit long in the tooth. Let me be clear - this is a matter of cybersecurity and maintaining the American dream of bug-free code.

Let's check for any known vulnerabilities:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for outdated packages and potential vulnerabilities
echo "Checking Vue.js version compatibility..."
curl -s https://api.github.com/repos/vuejs/vue/releases/latest | jq .tag_name

echo "Checking Vuetify latest version..."
curl -s https://api.github.com/repos/vuetifyjs/vuetify/releases/latest | jq .tag_name

# Check for security advisories
gh api graphql -f query='
{
  securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "vue") {
    nodes {
      advisory {
        summary
        severity
      }
      vulnerableVersionRange
    }
  }
}'

Length of output: 840


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check ESLint vulnerabilities
gh api graphql -f query='
{
  securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "eslint") {
    nodes {
      advisory {
        summary
        severity
      }
      vulnerableVersionRange
    }
  }
}'

# Check for version constraints in package-lock.json
echo "Checking package-lock.json for dependency constraints..."
if [ -f package-lock.json ]; then
    jq '.dependencies,.devDependencies | .. | select(.version?) | select(.version | contains("[email protected]") or contains("[email protected]") or contains("eslint@6"))' package-lock.json
fi

Length of output: 538

@kierandesmond kierandesmond merged commit 9b08d62 into PQView Jan 23, 2025
1 check passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jan 27, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants