Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix IPFS deployer subdirectory duplication issue #1847

Merged

Conversation

pileks
Copy link
Contributor

@pileks pileks commented Aug 3, 2023

This PR aims to:

Copy link
Contributor

@cbrzn cbrzn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm 🍏 just left a minor nit

Copy link
Contributor

@krisbitney krisbitney left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@krisbitney
Copy link
Contributor

@CodiumAI-Agent /review

@CodiumAI-Agent
Copy link

PR Analysis

  • 🎯 Main theme: Fixing a bug in the IPFS deployer and refactoring the code to make it testable
  • 📌 Type of PR: Bug fix
  • 🧪 Relevant tests added: Yes
  • Focused PR: Yes, because all changes are related to the IPFS deployer bug fix and refactoring
  • 🔒 Security concerns: No, because the changes in this PR do not introduce any new security concerns.

PR Feedback

  • General suggestions: The PR is well-structured and focused on a specific issue. The refactor makes the code more modular and testable, which is a good practice. However, consider using path.join() for constructing paths to avoid potential issues with different operating systems.

  • 🤖 Code feedback:

    • relevant file: packages/cli/src/lib/defaults/deploy-modules/ipfs/utils.ts
      suggestion: Consider using path.join() for constructing paths. This can help avoid potential issues with different operating systems and make the code more robust. [important]
      relevant line: ${path}/${dirent.name}

    • relevant file: packages/cli/src/lib/defaults/deploy-modules/ipfs/utils.ts
      suggestion: Consider handling potential errors that might occur during the reading of the directory or file. This can be done using try/catch blocks. [important]
      relevant line: const dirents: fs.Dirent[] = await fs.promises.readdir(path, { withFileTypes: true });

    • relevant file: packages/cli/src/lib/defaults/deploy-modules/ipfs/utils.ts
      suggestion: Consider using a more descriptive name for the variable 'dirents'. It might be more clear to name it something like 'directoryEntries'. [medium]
      relevant line: const dirents: fs.Dirent[] = await fs.promises.readdir(path, { withFileTypes: true });

How to use

Tag me in a comment '@CodiumAI-Agent' and add one of the following commands:
/review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option.
/describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR.
/ask <QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.

To edit any configuration parameter from 'configuration.toml', add --config_path=new_value
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.

@pileks pileks merged commit 766035e into origin-dev Aug 8, 2023
14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants