Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Super+/ Binding listed twice, in two sections, with different descriptions #34

Open
ids1024 opened this issue Sep 1, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@ids1024
Copy link
Member

ids1024 commented Sep 1, 2020

The "Navigate Applications and Windows" section lists the Super+/ binding as "Launch and Switch Applications". It is also listed under "Launcher Shortcuts", as "Activate Launcher".

  1. Do we want it listed in two places? It makes sense in both, but the duplication seems weird.
  2. If we remove one, which should be kept?
  3. In either case, presumably it should be described only one way. What should it be called?
@mmstick
Copy link
Member

mmstick commented Sep 1, 2020

That'd be a question for @maria-komarova

@maria-komarova
Copy link

Yeah, that's somewhat weird. I would still leave that in both places considering people might be looking in different places for the and since we have Launcher shortcuts as its own category.
In terms of the description, maybe something like Activate Launcher to Open and Switch Applications? If that is not too long.

@ids1024
Copy link
Member Author

ids1024 commented Sep 2, 2020

A bit verbose, but seems to fit with others:

Screenshot from 2020-09-02 10-11-06

I suppose we also want to use the same description in both gnome-control-center and shell-shortcuts.

I'm not really sure whether or not the verbosity of this description succeeds in making it clear what the shortcut does. Hm...

@maria-komarova
Copy link

Yeah... I am not sure either. After pondering that more we should probably stick with "Launch and switch applications" for all three places. Somewhat less verbose but still gives one the end result.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants