-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 43
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update time domain documentation #3219
Conversation
Update link to powsybl-dynawo and reference to DLS/ mapping. Add documentation for itools command list-dynamic-simulation-models Signed-off-by: lisrte <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks a lot for improving the documentation. I left some minor remarks about typos.
Signed-off-by: lisrte <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Sophie Frasnedo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Florian Dupuy <[email protected]>
For the moment, the only way to add events to the simulation is through a groovy script. Note that the syntax of this script is specific to each simulator: | ||
- [Dynawo event model DSL](inv:powsybldynawo:*:*#dynamic_simulation/event-models-dsl) | ||
The event models may be provided through a groovy script thanks to the `GroovyEventModelsSupplier` provided in powsybl-dynamic-simulation-dsl artifact. Note that the syntax of this groovy script is specific to each simulator. | ||
See [Dynawo event model DSL](inv:powsybldynawo:*:*#dynamic_simulation/event-models-mapping) for Dynawo specific DSL and others mapping methods. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As mentioned in the PR powsybl/powsybl-dynawo#410, could we speak of mapping for events? and for output variables?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the work!
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
Seen with @flo-du: OK to merge this PR in this state to have it in the 6.6.0 release. It fixes the documentation and the last comment is not crucial.
* Replace Dynawaltz with Dynawo Update link to powsybl-dynawo and reference to DLS/ mapping. Add documentation for itools command list-dynamic-simulation-models * Apply suggestions from code review Signed-off-by: lisrte <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Florian Dupuy <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Sophie Frasnedo <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 6357a5b)
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem?
No
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Docs update
What is the current behavior?
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
Replace Dynawaltz provider name with Dynawo
Update link to powsybl-dynawo and reference to DSL/ mapping (PR 410)
Add documentation for itools command
list-dynamic-simulation-models
Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API?
Other information:
Linked to PR 410