ASB-Aug 2024 Security Patches integration

Integrating Google Android Security Bulletin Patches

Test done: STS r29 TCs Passed

Tracked-On: OAM-122533
Signed-off-by: Alam, Sahibex <[email protected]>

aosp_diff/base_aaos/build/make/0004-Update-security_patch_level-string.patch

@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ index 0daae6bdcb..d14bd65167 100644
      #  It must match one of the Android Security Patch Level strings of the Public Security Bulletins.
      #  If there is no $PLATFORM_SECURITY_PATCH set, keep it empty.
 -    PLATFORM_SECURITY_PATCH := 2022-07-05
-+    PLATFORM_SECURITY_PATCH := 2024-07-01
++    PLATFORM_SECURITY_PATCH := 2024-08-01
  endif
  .KATI_READONLY := PLATFORM_SECURITY_PATCH
 

aosp_diff/base_aaos/frameworks/av/41_0041-libmediatranscoding-handle-death-recipient-cookie-ownership-dif.bulletin.patch

@@ -0,0 +1,163 @@
+From 07df1d8dd95fb6af803f6f44905f2d473bdf7efa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Devin Moore <[email protected]>
+Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 19:19:38 +0000
+Subject: [PATCH] libmediatranscoding: handle death recipient cookie ownership
+ differently
+
+The ownership of the death recipient cookie is now limited to the
+TranscodingResourcePolicy object and the binderDied callback.
+They both must be able to delete the cookie object and they both must be
+aware of it already being deleted.
+
+In all cases, the TranscodingResourcePolicy object that needs to be
+unregistered will outlive the cookie and the death recipient.
+
+Calling unlinkToDeath is unneccessary because the last strong ref to the
+binder that was linked to death is removed in the unregisterSelf method
+which will unlink the binder and death recipient.
+
+Test: atest CtsMediaTranscodingTestCases MediaSampleReaderNDKTests
+Test: adb shell kill -9 `pid  media.resource_observer`
+Test: delete mResourcePolicy.get() to force destructor after linkToDeath
+Bug: 319210610
+(cherry picked from https://googleplex-android-review.googlesource.com/q/commit:0c674f5ff68daa64b90e1a234061ba9bebe6173c)
+(cherry picked from https://googleplex-android-review.googlesource.com/q/commit:0213a7d62ea5545b954145cc53e2bd65ed5dc609)
+(cherry picked from https://googleplex-android-review.googlesource.com/q/commit:686987b9613678fe6540079e85e0d94519551738)
+Merged-In: I8e6ba40fe3da30bf8753e7a16ad5c8cd5dfda40b
+Change-Id: I8e6ba40fe3da30bf8753e7a16ad5c8cd5dfda40b
+---
+ .../TranscodingResourcePolicy.cpp             | 58 +++++++++++++++++--
+ .../include/media/TranscodingResourcePolicy.h |  4 ++
+ 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/media/libmediatranscoding/TranscodingResourcePolicy.cpp b/media/libmediatranscoding/TranscodingResourcePolicy.cpp
+index af53f64671..1b91362463 100644
+--- a/media/libmediatranscoding/TranscodingResourcePolicy.cpp
++++ b/media/libmediatranscoding/TranscodingResourcePolicy.cpp
+@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
+ #include <media/TranscodingResourcePolicy.h>
+ #include <utils/Log.h>
+
++#include <map>
++
+ namespace android {
+
+ using Status = ::ndk::ScopedAStatus;
+@@ -66,11 +68,31 @@ struct TranscodingResourcePolicy::ResourceObserver : public BnResourceObserver {
+     TranscodingResourcePolicy* mOwner;
+ };
+
++// cookie used for death recipients. The TranscodingResourcePolicy
++// that this cookie is associated with must outlive this cookie. It is
++// either deleted by binderDied, or in unregisterSelf which is also called
++// in the destructor of TranscodingResourcePolicy
++class TranscodingResourcePolicyCookie {
++public:
++    TranscodingResourcePolicyCookie(TranscodingResourcePolicy* policy) : mPolicy(policy) {}
++    TranscodingResourcePolicyCookie() = delete;
++    TranscodingResourcePolicy* mPolicy;
++};
++
++static std::map<uintptr_t, std::unique_ptr<TranscodingResourcePolicyCookie>> sCookies;
++static uintptr_t sCookieKeyCounter;
++static std::mutex sCookiesMutex;
++
+ // static
+ void TranscodingResourcePolicy::BinderDiedCallback(void* cookie) {
+-    TranscodingResourcePolicy* owner = reinterpret_cast<TranscodingResourcePolicy*>(cookie);
+-    if (owner != nullptr) {
+-        owner->unregisterSelf();
++    std::lock_guard<std::mutex> guard(sCookiesMutex);
++    if (auto it = sCookies.find(reinterpret_cast<uintptr_t>(cookie)); it != sCookies.end()) {
++        ALOGI("BinderDiedCallback unregistering TranscodingResourcePolicy");
++        auto policy = reinterpret_cast<TranscodingResourcePolicy*>(it->second->mPolicy);
++        if (policy) {
++            policy->unregisterSelf();
++        }
++        sCookies.erase(it);
+     }
+     // TODO(chz): retry to connecting to IResourceObserverService after failure.
+     // Also need to have back-up logic if IResourceObserverService is offline for
+@@ -88,6 +110,24 @@ TranscodingResourcePolicy::TranscodingResourcePolicy()
+ }
+
+ TranscodingResourcePolicy::~TranscodingResourcePolicy() {
++    {
++        std::lock_guard<std::mutex> guard(sCookiesMutex);
++
++        // delete all of the cookies associated with this TranscodingResourcePolicy
++        // instance since they are holding pointers to this object that will no
++        // longer be valid.
++        for (auto it = sCookies.begin(); it != sCookies.end();) {
++            const uintptr_t key = it->first;
++            std::lock_guard guard(mCookieKeysLock);
++            if (mCookieKeys.find(key) != mCookieKeys.end()) {
++                // No longer need to track this cookie
++                mCookieKeys.erase(key);
++                it = sCookies.erase(it);
++            } else {
++                it++;
++            }
++        }
++    }
+     unregisterSelf();
+ }
+
+@@ -123,7 +163,16 @@ void TranscodingResourcePolicy::registerSelf() {
+         return;
+     }
+
+-    AIBinder_linkToDeath(binder.get(), mDeathRecipient.get(), reinterpret_cast<void*>(this));
++    std::unique_ptr<TranscodingResourcePolicyCookie> cookie =
++            std::make_unique<TranscodingResourcePolicyCookie>(this);
++    uintptr_t cookieKey = sCookieKeyCounter++;
++    sCookies.emplace(cookieKey, std::move(cookie));
++    {
++        std::lock_guard guard(mCookieKeysLock);
++        mCookieKeys.insert(cookieKey);
++    }
++
++    AIBinder_linkToDeath(binder.get(), mDeathRecipient.get(), reinterpret_cast<void*>(cookieKey));
+
+     ALOGD("@@@ registered observer");
+     mRegistered = true;
+@@ -141,7 +190,6 @@ void TranscodingResourcePolicy::unregisterSelf() {
+     ::ndk::SpAIBinder binder = mService->asBinder();
+     if (binder.get() != nullptr) {
+         Status status = mService->unregisterObserver(mObserver);
+-        AIBinder_unlinkToDeath(binder.get(), mDeathRecipient.get(), reinterpret_cast<void*>(this));
+     }
+
+     mService = nullptr;
+diff --git a/media/libmediatranscoding/include/media/TranscodingResourcePolicy.h b/media/libmediatranscoding/include/media/TranscodingResourcePolicy.h
+index ee232e7551..4d762b5832 100644
+--- a/media/libmediatranscoding/include/media/TranscodingResourcePolicy.h
++++ b/media/libmediatranscoding/include/media/TranscodingResourcePolicy.h
+@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
+ #include <utils/Condition.h>
+
+ #include <mutex>
++#include <set>
+ namespace aidl {
+ namespace android {
+ namespace media {
+@@ -48,6 +49,8 @@ private:
+     bool mRegistered GUARDED_BY(mRegisteredLock);
+     std::shared_ptr<IResourceObserverService> mService GUARDED_BY(mRegisteredLock);
+     std::shared_ptr<ResourceObserver> mObserver;
++    mutable std::mutex mCookieKeysLock;
++    std::set<uintptr_t> mCookieKeys;
+
+     mutable std::mutex mCallbackLock;
+     std::weak_ptr<ResourcePolicyCallbackInterface> mResourcePolicyCallback
+@@ -59,6 +62,7 @@ private:
+     static void BinderDiedCallback(void* cookie);
+
+     void registerSelf();
++    // must delete the associated TranscodingResourcePolicyCookie any time this is called
+     void unregisterSelf();
+     void onResourceAvailable(pid_t pid);
+ };  // class TranscodingUidPolicy
+-- 
+2.45.2.505.gda0bf45e8d-goog
+

aosp_diff/base_aaos/frameworks/av/42_0042-StagefrightRecoder-Disabling-B-frame-support.bulletin.patch

@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+From 73d11ac20f91aff263e45555a85643884d656714 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Rakesh Kumar <[email protected]>
+Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 11:17:48 +0000
+Subject: [PATCH] StagefrightRecoder: Disabling B-frame support
+
+Disabling b-frame support from stagefright recorder in case of
+audio source as mic and video source is surface use case only
+because screen recorder with microphone doesn't play in sync
+if b-frame is enabled.
+If the audio source selected is INTERNAL (i.e. device) or
+MIC_AND_INTERNAL with screen recorder then b frame is supported.
+
+Bug: 288549440
+Test: manually check screen recording with audio from mic has audio/video in synch
+(cherry picked from https://googleplex-android-review.googlesource.com/q/commit:af685c66bab17b71fe1624f76b5d55628f79e6fa)
+(cherry picked from https://googleplex-android-review.googlesource.com/q/commit:da3407f7688f35eb2dce79f1405feeb182241a3c)
+Merged-In: I4098655eb9687fb633085333bc140634441566e6
+Change-Id: I4098655eb9687fb633085333bc140634441566e6
+---
+ media/libmediaplayerservice/StagefrightRecorder.cpp | 5 +++++
+ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
+
+diff --git a/media/libmediaplayerservice/StagefrightRecorder.cpp b/media/libmediaplayerservice/StagefrightRecorder.cpp
+index bffd7b3243..209b1f8036 100644
+--- a/media/libmediaplayerservice/StagefrightRecorder.cpp
++++ b/media/libmediaplayerservice/StagefrightRecorder.cpp
+@@ -2070,6 +2070,11 @@ status_t StagefrightRecorder::setupVideoEncoder(
+
+     if (tsLayers > 1) {
+         uint32_t bLayers = std::min(2u, tsLayers - 1); // use up-to 2 B-layers
++        // TODO(b/341121900): Remove this once B frames are handled correctly in screen recorder
++        // use case in case of mic only
++        if (mAudioSource == AUDIO_SOURCE_MIC && mVideoSource == VIDEO_SOURCE_SURFACE) {
++            bLayers = 0;
++        }
+         uint32_t pLayers = tsLayers - bLayers;
+         format->setString(
+                 "ts-schema", AStringPrintf("android.generic.%u+%u", pLayers, bLayers));
+-- 
+2.45.2.505.gda0bf45e8d-goog
+

aosp_diff/base_aaos/frameworks/base/99_0286-Fix-error-handling-for-non-dynamic-permissions.bulletin.patch

@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+From 57ba37a9fc7f118d97d2e4ac7efc5a41d04f2501 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Yi-an Chen <[email protected]>
+Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 04:34:57 +0000
+Subject: [PATCH] Fix error handling for non-dynamic permissions
+
+We only allow removing dynamic permissions. When removePermission() is
+called for a non-dynamic permission, in addition to logging it, we
+should also return early to avoid the removePermission() call.
+
+Test: manual
+Bug: 321555066
+Fixes: 321711213
+(cherry picked from https://googleplex-android-review.googlesource.com/q/commit:2b5d63b64b2b8208ccc4f62eac3d8962f981dbf8)
+Merged-In: I7336f2fc78804f26e4b2a329870ecdea776595d8
+Change-Id: I7336f2fc78804f26e4b2a329870ecdea776595d8
+---
+ .../android/server/pm/permission/PermissionManagerService.java   | 1 +
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
+
+diff --git a/services/core/java/com/android/server/pm/permission/PermissionManagerService.java b/services/core/java/com/android/server/pm/permission/PermissionManagerService.java
+index dd8b96eab3d7..31babe0418b8 100644
+--- a/services/core/java/com/android/server/pm/permission/PermissionManagerService.java
++++ b/services/core/java/com/android/server/pm/permission/PermissionManagerService.java
+@@ -691,6 +691,7 @@ public class PermissionManagerService extends IPermissionManager.Stub {
+                 // TODO: switch this back to SecurityException
+                 Slog.wtf(TAG, "Not allowed to modify non-dynamic permission "
+                         + permName);
++                return;
+             }
+             mRegistry.removePermission(permName);
+         }
+-- 
+2.45.2.505.gda0bf45e8d-goog
+

aosp_diff/base_aaos/frameworks/base/99_0287-Fix-security-vulnerability-of-non-dynamic-permission-removal.bulletin.patch

@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+From 58a0ab5bc7abaa174187a1548982fd74ff18f00d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Yi-an Chen <[email protected]>
+Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 21:53:02 +0000
+Subject: [PATCH] Fix security vulnerability of non-dynamic permission removal
+
+The original removePermission() code in PermissionManagerService
+missed a logical negation operator when handling non-dynamic
+permissions, causing both
+testPermissionPermission_nonDynamicPermission_permissionUnchanged and
+testRemovePermission_dynamicPermission_permissionRemoved tests in
+DynamicPermissionsTest to fail.
+
+The corresponding test DynamicPermissionsTest is also updated in the
+other CL: ag/27073864
+
+Bug: 321711213
+Test: DynamicPermissionsTest on sc-dev and tm-dev locally
+(cherry picked from https://googleplex-android-review.googlesource.com/q/commit:35d77a77feef62dc108f6478cb9228cc6044f70d)
+Merged-In: Id573b75cdcfce3a1df5731ffb00c4228c513e686
+Change-Id: Id573b75cdcfce3a1df5731ffb00c4228c513e686
+---
+ .../android/server/pm/permission/PermissionManagerService.java  | 2 +-
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+diff --git a/services/core/java/com/android/server/pm/permission/PermissionManagerService.java b/services/core/java/com/android/server/pm/permission/PermissionManagerService.java
+index 31babe0418b8..93f9e1c2295c 100644
+--- a/services/core/java/com/android/server/pm/permission/PermissionManagerService.java
++++ b/services/core/java/com/android/server/pm/permission/PermissionManagerService.java
+@@ -687,7 +687,7 @@ public class PermissionManagerService extends IPermissionManager.Stub {
+             if (bp == null) {
+                 return;
+             }
+-            if (bp.isDynamic()) {
++            if (!bp.isDynamic()) {
+                 // TODO: switch this back to SecurityException
+                 Slog.wtf(TAG, "Not allowed to modify non-dynamic permission "
+                         + permName);
+-- 
+2.45.2.505.gda0bf45e8d-goog
+