Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency com.google.googlejavaformat:google-java-format to v1.25.0 #259

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Nov 19, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
com.google.googlejavaformat:google-java-format 1.24.0 -> 1.25.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

google/google-java-format (com.google.googlejavaformat:google-java-format)

v1.25.0

Compare Source

The minimum support JDK version to run google-java-format is now JDK 17 (#​1159). Using google-java-format to format earlier versions of the language is still supported, but running the formatter itself on JDK 17 or newer is required.

Changes:

  • Various improvements to text block formatting
  • Improve formatting of when pattern guards

Full Changelog: google/google-java-format@v1.24.0...v1.25.0


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge (squash) November 19, 2024 03:22
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/googlejavaformat branch 2 times, most recently from 8e15d9a to b799209 Compare November 20, 2024 20:57
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/googlejavaformat branch from b799209 to df26ef7 Compare November 20, 2024 22:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants