Feature/306 check in refactoring #466
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Vakmeth
force-pushed
the
feature/306-check-in-refactoring
branch
2 times, most recently
from
d3c15c3 to
394170c
Compare
…-ins when trying to update one
…to be tested in e2e tests
Vakmeth
force-pushed
the
feature/306-check-in-refactoring
branch
from
394170c to
cb170a5
Compare
peggimann
approved these changes
Oct 19, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Was gemacht wurde:
=> Die Endimplementation vor Review am 18.12.2023 wurde mit UX besprochen, @tobiasstern hat als Feedback das Erhöhen der Margin im Check-In History Dialog zwischen Label und Text angegeben, dieses Feedback wurde umgesetzt.