-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 56
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
✨ adding new type iban #65
Conversation
please review |
We have more properties that could be added as shown in here. Do you think it's worth it ? |
Yes its totally worth it 👍🏻 |
I'll do it still on this PR then, thanks. Possibly today. |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #65 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 10 11 +1
Lines 665 726 +61
Branches 166 183 +17
=========================================
+ Hits 665 726 +61 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Just did @yezz123, sorry for the time it took. If I did not miss anything, we should be good. |
@yezz123 now we're ready for review 😄 |
Resolves #10 |
please put this in the PR body so it closes the issue upon merge. |
Done @samuelcolvin, thanks. |
sorry for late review @kroncatti i will review it again today and test it then we can merge it 🙏🏻 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@kroncatti Thank you for the great work 🙏🏻
I test it and tried multiple examples.
Will merge it once @tpdorsey approve for the documentation
Please don't merge this yet. Let's try to get |
@Kludex I've just request a review from you on this. You have control now over when it could be merged. |
So much power! 👀 I've opened mdomke/schwifty#147 on |
Amazing folks! thanks! |
dnd :) |
Hey folks, It's been a few weeks we are waiting on this. What is you guys opinion ? Should we wait to merge ? |
I think we should wait for mdomke/schwifty#147. |
I vote to move forward. |
This PR is ready once we drop support for Python 3.7 🙏🏻 . |
@kroncatti @yezz123 @Kludex Hi! I've implemented the Pydantic protocol support in mdomke/schwifty#147 last year November. Sorry that it took me a while, but I was quite busy at the time. Is the implementation in |
Oh, nice! Maybe we can add that to the Pydantic documentation? |
Resolves #10
Selected Reviewer: @yezz123