Add rule feature

[jsa34]

• Add changelog entry
• Add README entry
• Add tests
  Resolves Rule keyword #511

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 94.73684% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 95.70%. Comparing base (f47c6d2) to head (d67a7b8).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/pytest_bdd/gherkin_terminal_reporter.py	72.22%	4 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #728      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.74%   95.70%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          54       55       +1     
  Lines        2114     2187      +73     
  Branches      228      192      -36     
==========================================
+ Hits         2024     2093      +69     
- Misses         55       58       +3     
- Partials       35       36       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[jsa34]

@youtux Created a new PR with the rule feature in as I messed up the rebasing!

[jsa34]

Implemented all feedback.

Just this: #728 (comment) I think needs to be as it is, so we know what type of background it is (under a feature or under rule), but may have misunderstood the suggestion!

[Poogles]

Hero thanks for implementing this and the data tables work. <3

[jsa34]

Pleasure!

Glad it is hopefully helpful!

[jsa34]

@youtux is there anything else after this that would be necessary for a V8 release? (I'm assuming https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-bdd/milestone/1 is our definition of what we want to achieve for v8? If so, I can pick up the multiple examples table one and then i think that's it in terms of features)

[youtux]

Not necessarily. If #489 is not a backwards incompatible change, it can go in a minor release.

I think if we merge this we can release v8.0.0.

[youtux]

Unless there are outstanding issues I forgot about

[youtux]

I'll try reviewing this in the weekend if I manage

[jsa34]

No rush at all - Appreciated as always!

[jsa34]

Committed responses to latest feedback :)

[jsa34]

Removed feature field from Rule

[jsa34]

Feedback resolved :)

[jsa34]

Addressed feedback :)

[jsa34]

@youtux tried rerunning the checks, but codecov consistently seems unhappy. Not sure what's happening...

[youtux]

Yeah there's something going on with codecov. I'll merge this manually