Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

khepri_tree: Ignore unknown props to return #308

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 11, 2024

Conversation

dumbbell
Copy link
Member

Why

A future version of Khepri might introduce new props to return. If a Khepri cluster is being upgraded and several versions of the Khepri machine are running at the same time, an old node could be called with props to return it doesn’t know.

How

We simply ignore unknown props.

In the process, we ignore delete_reason because it is set by another part of the code anyway.

@dumbbell dumbbell self-assigned this Dec 11, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.42%. Comparing base (6f88694) to head (257cf32).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #308      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.73%   89.42%   -0.31%     
==========================================
  Files          22       22              
  Lines        3263     3263              
==========================================
- Hits         2928     2918      -10     
- Misses        335      345      +10     
Flag Coverage Δ
erlang-25 88.66% <ø> (-0.04%) ⬇️
erlang-26 89.33% <ø> (-0.04%) ⬇️
erlang-27 89.36% <ø> (ø)
os-ubuntu-latest 89.42% <ø> (-0.28%) ⬇️
os-windows-latest 89.42% <ø> (+0.06%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Why]
A future version of Khepri might introduce new props to return. If a
Khepri cluster is being upgraded and several versions of the Khepri
machine are running at the same time, an old node could be called with
props to return it doesn’t know.

[How]
We simply ignore unknown props.

In the process, we ignore `delete_reason` because it is set by another
part of the code anyway.
@dumbbell dumbbell force-pushed the ignore-unknown-props_to_return branch from 5c73387 to 257cf32 Compare December 11, 2024 13:53
@dumbbell dumbbell marked this pull request as ready for review December 11, 2024 14:00
@dumbbell dumbbell merged commit 39a97d7 into main Dec 11, 2024
26 checks passed
@dumbbell dumbbell deleted the ignore-unknown-props_to_return branch December 11, 2024 15:42
@dumbbell dumbbell added this to the v0.17.0 milestone Dec 12, 2024
@dumbbell dumbbell added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 12, 2024
dumbbell added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2024
…>= 2 only

[Why]
The `delete_reason` property to return was introduced with machine
version 2. Older versions have two issues:
* They don't know this property
* They crash on unknown properties

[How]
We request this new property only if the effective machine version is
greater or equal to 2 to avoid the issues listed above.

Future unknown properties are ignored since commit
257cf32 merged in the previous pull
request #308.
dumbbell added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2024
…>= 2 only

[Why]
The `delete_reason` property to return was introduced with machine
version 2. Older versions have two issues:
* They don't know this property
* They crash on unknown properties

[How]
We request this new property only if the effective machine version is
greater or equal to 2 to avoid the issues listed above.

Future unknown properties are ignored since commit
257cf32 merged in the previous pull
request #308.
dumbbell added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2024
…>= 2 only

[Why]
The `delete_reason` property to return was introduced with machine
version 2. Older versions have two issues:
* They don't know this property
* They crash on unknown properties

[How]
We request this new property only if the effective machine version is
greater or equal to 2 to avoid the issues listed above.

Future unknown properties are ignored since commit
257cf32 merged in the previous pull
request #308.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants