-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
eta and beta aren't nicely compatible with n-ary functions #258
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
84a3cff
to
755d5fc
Compare
755d5fc
to
cd2108e
Compare
…intead of `e`s in various functions). I got a bit overzealous in my changes! :)
and use it to uncopy the code in mon-aft.scrbl
cd2108e
to
cf630a5
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Resyntax analyzed 0 files in this pull request and found no issues.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Resyntax analyzed 0 files in this pull request and found no issues.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Resyntax analyzed 0 files in this pull request and found no issues.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Resyntax analyzed 0 files in this pull request and found no issues.
... and the existing code in long-tut was wrong, as found by random testing.
After some discussion with @mfelleisen the best approach seems to be to just get rid of n-ary lambda expressions, so this pull request is a work-in-progress to do that.