adds integration test #467
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent updates to the AWS Kinesis project enhance the testing framework by introducing new configuration classes and modifying existing test cases. Key changes include the addition of new fields in the Changes
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
aws-kinesis-project/producer/docker/docker-compose.ymlis excluded by:!**/*.yml
Files selected for processing (4)
- aws-kinesis-project/producer/.localstack/init-aws.sh (1 hunks)
- aws-kinesis-project/producer/src/test/java/com/learning/aws/spring/ApplicationIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- aws-kinesis-project/producer/src/test/java/com/learning/aws/spring/common/AbstractIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- aws-kinesis-project/producer/src/test/java/com/learning/aws/spring/common/LocalStackConfig.java (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- aws-kinesis-project/producer/.localstack/init-aws.sh
Additional comments: 3
aws-kinesis-project/producer/src/test/java/com/learning/aws/spring/ApplicationIntegrationTest.java (1)
- 17-37: The
contextLoadsmethod includes comprehensive assertions to validate message handling, headers, and payload content. A few suggestions for improvement:
Exception Handling: The method throws
InterruptedExceptionandJsonProcessingException. Ensure that these exceptions are handled appropriately or documented if they are expected to be managed by the test framework or calling code.Magic Numbers: The assertion
hasSize(10)uses a magic number. Consider defining this as a constant with a descriptive name to improve readability and maintainability.Header Validation: The validation of headers using
containsKeysanddoesNotContainKeysis a good practice. However, consider adding comments to explain the significance of these specific headers in the context of your application and tests.Payload Validation: The payload validation checks for a specific message (
"Message0") and a header entry ("event.eventType", "createEvent"). It might be beneficial to explain why these specific values are expected, possibly in comments or documentation, to help future maintainers understand the test's intent.Overall, the method is well-structured and aligns with the PR's objectives to enhance integration testing capabilities.
aws-kinesis-project/producer/src/test/java/com/learning/aws/spring/common/AbstractIntegrationTest.java (1)
- 7-9: The addition of new fields (
KinesisAsyncClient,messageBarrier,messageHolder) and updated@SpringBootTestproperties significantly enhances the testing infrastructure. A few points to consider:
Field Injection: The fields are injected using
@Autowired. While this is a common practice in Spring, consider using constructor injection for better testability and to follow the dependency injection principle more closely.Properties Configuration: The updated
@SpringBootTestproperties are specific and seem to be well-tailored for the integration tests. Ensure that these properties do not conflict with other tests or the overall application configuration. It might be beneficial to document the rationale behind these specific property values for future reference.Resource Cleanup: Ensure that resources, especially those related to
KinesisAsyncClient, are properly cleaned up after tests to avoid potential resource leaks or conflicts with other tests.Overall, these changes are a positive step towards enhancing the integration testing framework.
Also applies to: 14-14, 17-17, 38-42
aws-kinesis-project/producer/src/test/java/com/learning/aws/spring/common/LocalStackConfig.java (1)
- 3-6: The updates to the
LocalStackConfigclass, including new bean declarations (messageHolder,messageBarrier) and system property settings for AWS credentials and region, are essential for simulating AWS Kinesis using LocalStack. A few points to consider:
System Properties: Setting system properties directly within the static initializer block can lead to side effects that are hard to trace. Consider using Spring's
@Valueannotation or configuration properties to manage these settings more transparently.Bean Type Mismatch: The
messageHolderbean is declared to hold aList<Message<?>>, but theeventConsumerBatchProcessingWithHeadersmethod seems to set it with aList<Message<?>>. Ensure that the types are consistent and correct according to the intended use.Resource Management: Given that
LocalStackContaineris started within the static initializer block, ensure that there is a corresponding mechanism to properly stop and clean up this resource to avoid potential resource leaks.Documentation: Adding comments or documentation explaining the purpose of each system property and bean would be beneficial for future maintainers, especially given the complexity of simulating AWS services locally.
Overall, these changes are crucial for enhancing the integration testing framework and simulating AWS Kinesis effectively.
Also applies to: 9-9, 13-51
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
aws-kinesis-project/producer/pom.xmlis excluded by:!**/*.xml
Files selected for processing (1)
- aws-kinesis-project/producer/src/test/java/com/learning/aws/spring/common/LocalStackConfig.java (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- aws-kinesis-project/producer/src/test/java/com/learning/aws/spring/common/LocalStackConfig.java
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- aws-kinesis-project/producer/src/test/java/com/learning/aws/spring/common/LocalStackConfig.java (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- aws-kinesis-project/producer/src/test/java/com/learning/aws/spring/common/LocalStackConfig.java
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
aws-kinesis-project/producer/pom.xmlis excluded by:!**/*.xml
Files selected for processing (2)
- aws-kinesis-project/producer/src/test/java/com/learning/aws/spring/TestKinesisProducerApplication.java (2 hunks)
- aws-kinesis-project/producer/src/test/java/com/learning/aws/spring/common/AbstractIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
Check Runs (1)
Run Unit & Integration Tests completed (1)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- aws-kinesis-project/producer/src/test/java/com/learning/aws/spring/common/AbstractIntegrationTest.java
Additional comments: 3
aws-kinesis-project/producer/src/test/java/com/learning/aws/spring/TestKinesisProducerApplication.java (3)
- 5-8: The addition of new imports for
java.utilclasses,CountDownLatch,AtomicReference, andConsumeris appropriate for the integration testing enhancements described. These classes are essential for handling asynchronous operations and message processing in the test environment.- 12-12: The import of
org.springframework.messaging.Messageis crucial for handling messages within the integration tests. This aligns with the PR objectives of validating message handling, headers, and payload content.- 51-67: The new
@Beanmethods introduced (messageHolder,messageBarrier, andeventConsumerBatchProcessingWithHeaders) are well-designed to support the integration testing framework. They facilitate asynchronous communication and message validation, which are key aspects of the testing enhancements.
messageHolderBean: This bean is used to hold the message being tested. UsingAtomicReferenceensures thread-safety, which is important in an asynchronous testing environment.
messageBarrierBean: TheCountDownLatchis used to synchronize the test execution with the arrival of messages. This is a common pattern in integration testing where asynchronous operations are involved.
eventConsumerBatchProcessingWithHeadersBean: This consumer bean processes the messages and updates themessageHolderandmessageBarrieraccordingly. The implementation correctly sets the message in themessageHolderand counts down themessageBarrier, allowing the test to proceed once the message is processed.Overall, these changes are well thought out and directly support the objectives of enhancing the integration testing framework for the AWS Kinesis project's producer component.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- aws-kinesis-project/producer/.localstack/init-aws.sh (1 hunks)
Check Runs (2)
Build and analyze completed (1)
Run Unit & Integration Tests completed (1)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- aws-kinesis-project/producer/.localstack/init-aws.sh
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- aws-kinesis-project/producer/src/test/java/com/learning/aws/spring/TestKinesisProducerApplication.java (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
aws-kinesis-project/producer/src/test/java/com/learning/aws/spring/TestKinesisProducerApplication.java (3)
52-55: LGTM! Verify the usage ofmessageHolder.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that
messageHolderis used appropriately in a concurrent environment.
57-60: LGTM! Verify the usage ofmessageBarrier.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that
messageBarrieris used appropriately in the codebase.Verification successful
The usage of
messageBarrieris appropriate.The
messageBarrierbean is used correctly in the codebase:
- It is counted down in
TestKinesisProducerApplication.java.- It is awaited in
ApplicationIntegrationTest.java.- It is autowired in
AbstractIntegrationTest.java.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `messageBarrier` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of `messageBarrier`. Expect: Proper usage in the codebase. rg --type java -A 5 $'messageBarrier'Length of output: 3145
62-68: LGTM! Verify the usage ofeventConsumerBatchProcessingWithHeaders.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that
eventConsumerBatchProcessingWithHeadersis used appropriately in the codebase.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
aws-kinesis-project/producer/src/test/java/com/learning/aws/spring/ApplicationIntegrationTest.java (3)
22-26: Consider a named constant for barrier wait time
Parameterizing the 30-second wait can promote reuse and improve consistency across tests, avoiding magic numbers in multiple locations.
28-34: Double-check AWS headers if new or custom headers are needed
Currently, the test ensures certain standard AWS headers are present or absent. If the application evolves to handle additional headers, consider updating these assertions for expanded coverage.
40-54: Strong record-level validations
Verifying sequence number, approximate arrival timestamp, partition key, and data ensures comprehensive coverage of AWS Kinesis record attributes. If other Kinesis record attributes (such as EncryptionType) become critical, consider extending the assertions.aws-kinesis-project/producer/src/test/java/com/learning/aws/spring/common/ConsumerConfig.java (2)
43-46: Potential concurrency considerations
While an AtomicReference is suitable for holding a single message, consider a thread-safe list or queue if you plan to handle multiple incoming messages concurrently.
48-51: Using a single-latch mechanism
A latch set to 1 is a quick solution for single-event synchronization. If you need to await multiple messages or trigger repeated consumption, consider a more flexible synchronization strategy.aws-kinesis-project/producer/src/test/resources/application-test.properties (2)
14-18: Consider using PAY_PER_REQUEST billing mode for testsThe current configuration uses provisioned capacity which might not be cost-effective for testing:
- Consider switching to
PAY_PER_REQUESTbilling mode for test environments- If keeping provisioned mode, verify if 5 RCU/WCU is sufficient for your test scenarios
20-23: Consider consolidating duplicate DynamoDB configurationsThe lock table configuration duplicates the same settings as the checkpoint table. Consider:
- Using shared properties for common values
- Similarly, consider
PAY_PER_REQUESTbilling mode for cost optimizationExample consolidation:
spring.cloud.stream.kinesis.binder.dynamodb.billingMode=PAY_PER_REQUEST spring.cloud.stream.kinesis.binder.dynamodb.readCapacity=${test.dynamodb.read.capacity:5} spring.cloud.stream.kinesis.binder.dynamodb.writeCapacity=${test.dynamodb.write.capacity:5}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
aws-kinesis-project/producer/pom.xml(1 hunks)aws-kinesis-project/producer/src/test/java/com/learning/aws/spring/ApplicationIntegrationTest.java(1 hunks)aws-kinesis-project/producer/src/test/java/com/learning/aws/spring/TestKinesisProducerApplication.java(1 hunks)aws-kinesis-project/producer/src/test/java/com/learning/aws/spring/common/AbstractIntegrationTest.java(1 hunks)aws-kinesis-project/producer/src/test/java/com/learning/aws/spring/common/ConsumerConfig.java(1 hunks)aws-kinesis-project/producer/src/test/java/com/learning/aws/spring/common/ContainerConfig.java(1 hunks)aws-kinesis-project/producer/src/test/resources/application-test.properties(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- aws-kinesis-project/producer/pom.xml
🔇 Additional comments (12)
aws-kinesis-project/producer/src/test/java/com/learning/aws/spring/ApplicationIntegrationTest.java (2)
3-17: No concerns with new imports
These imports appear standard for adding new references related to assertions, JSON processing, and AWS Kinesis integration.
36-38: Robust payload check
Asserting that the payload is not empty and has a size greater than one is a meaningful test to ensure multiple records are indeed processed.
aws-kinesis-project/producer/src/test/java/com/learning/aws/spring/TestKinesisProducerApplication.java (1)
3-11: Validate use of ConsumerConfig in non-production contexts
This approach ensures both ContainerConfig and ConsumerConfig are applied during testing. Verify that you do not unintentionally load testing configurations in production code.
aws-kinesis-project/producer/src/test/java/com/learning/aws/spring/common/AbstractIntegrationTest.java (2)
20-22: Appropriate inclusion of both configurations
Using both ContainerConfig and ConsumerConfig together ensures the local AWS services and the consumer-related beans are properly set up for integration tests. This is a neat separation of concerns.
30-34: Be mindful of concurrency when injecting shared fields
Injecting a CountDownLatch and an AtomicReference is convenient for synchronization. However, if tests run in parallel, these shared fields might cause unexpected race conditions.
Would you like me to create a script to confirm that parallel test executions do not inadvertently share these fields?
aws-kinesis-project/producer/src/test/java/com/learning/aws/spring/common/ConsumerConfig.java (3)
22-23: Clear delineation of test-only beans
Using @TestConfiguration neatly isolates these beans for testing, preventing them from leaking into production contexts.
25-41: Confirm alignment of LocalStack version features
Ensure that LocalStack version 4.0.3 fully supports the DynamoDB functionalities required by your tests, particularly around features like timeouts and retries. Check for any known issues or limitations in the local environment.
53-59: Straightforward event consumption
Storing the event in the AtomicReference and decrementing the latch is simple and effective. If your tests expand to more complex event processing, evaluate whether a pipeline-based or asynchronous processor approach is beneficial.
aws-kinesis-project/producer/src/test/java/com/learning/aws/spring/common/ContainerConfig.java (1)
28-28: Verify Kinesis service availability
Removing .withServices(KINESIS) relies on LocalStack defaults. Confirm the Kinesis service actually starts under this default configuration to avoid any hidden test failures.
Would you like me to generate a script checking that the LocalStack container exports the Kinesis endpoint correctly?
aws-kinesis-project/producer/src/test/resources/application-test.properties (3)
3-10: Consider parameterizing test stream configuration
The hardcoded stream name and configuration values could make tests less flexible. Consider:
- Using placeholder values (e.g.,
${test.stream.name}) to allow different configurations per environment - Validating if concurrency of 5 is appropriate for the test environment
- Consider testing both with and without native decoding to ensure proper serialization
1-23: Verify AWS region and credential configuration
The removal of AWS region and credential properties suggests these are configured elsewhere. Please verify:
- AWS region is properly configured in test environment
- Credentials are properly handled for integration tests
- Required IAM permissions are documented for running tests
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the main application properties and configuration classes to understand how AWS credentials and region are handled in the project.
AWS configuration is properly handled for test environment
The verification shows that AWS configuration is well-managed across different profiles:
- The test properties file focuses on stream-specific configurations
- AWS credentials and region are configured in
application-local.properties:- Region is set to
us-east-1 - Local testing uses LocalStack (endpoint:
http://localhost:4566) - Test credentials are properly mocked (
noop)
- Region is set to
This separation of concerns is correct - the test properties file doesn't need AWS credentials/region as they are inherited from the local profile, which is configured to use LocalStack for integration testing.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for AWS configuration in test classes and resources
rg "aws\.region|aws\.credentials|@TestConfiguration" --type java --type properties
# Check for potential credential configurations in other test files
fd -e properties -e yaml -x grep -l "aws"
Length of output: 2191
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of application.properties and application-local.properties in the kinesis producer project
cat ./aws-kinesis-project/producer/src/main/resources/application.properties
cat ./aws-kinesis-project/producer/src/main/resources/application-local.properties
# Search for AWS configuration classes or test configuration classes in the kinesis producer project
rg -t java "(@Configuration|@TestConfiguration|@Bean).*AWS" ./aws-kinesis-project/producer/src/
Length of output: 1428
12-12: Verify function bean definitions
Ensure that both consumeEvent and producerSupplier functions are properly defined in the test configuration.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different search strategy to locate these function definitions.
Let me try one more search to see the actual implementations.
Both functions are properly defined as Spring beans
The verification shows that both functions defined in application-test.properties are correctly implemented:
consumeEvent: Defined as a@BeaninConsumerConfig.javaas aConsumer<Message<List<Record>>>functionproducerSupplier: Defined as a@Beanin both test (LocalStackConfig.java) and main (IpProducer.java) configurations as aSupplier<List<IpAddressDTO>>function
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for function definitions in test classes
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
$$$
@Bean
$$$
consumeEvent($$$) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
$$$
@Bean
$$$
producerSupplier($$$) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 195
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for function definitions using ripgrep
echo "=== Searching for consumeEvent function ==="
rg -l "consumeEvent.*\(" --type java
echo -e "\n=== Searching for producerSupplier function ==="
rg -l "producerSupplier.*\(" --type java
echo -e "\n=== Showing context for any matches ==="
rg -A 5 -B 2 "@Bean.*\n.*(consumeEvent|producerSupplier)" --type java
Length of output: 1134
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for function definitions with context
echo "=== ConsumerConfig implementation ==="
cat "aws-kinesis-project/producer/src/test/java/com/learning/aws/spring/common/ConsumerConfig.java"
echo -e "\n=== LocalStackConfig implementation ==="
cat "aws-kinesis-project/consumer/src/test/java/com/learning/aws/spring/common/LocalStackConfig.java"
echo -e "\n=== IpProducer implementation ==="
cat "aws-kinesis-project/producer/src/main/java/com/learning/aws/spring/producer/IpProducer.java"
Length of output: 5963
| String payload = dataAsString.substring(dataAsString.indexOf("[{")); | ||
| List<IpAddressDTO> ipAddressDTOS = | ||
| objectMapper.readValue(payload, new TypeReference<>() {}); | ||
| assertThat(ipAddressDTOS).isNotEmpty().hasSize(254); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Safeguard substring usage and avoid magic numbers
- If
dataAsString.indexOf("[{")returns-1, an exception occurs. Consider adding a protective check or using a more stable parsing strategy. - The hard-coded
254size could be extracted as a constant or read from a configuration to document its purpose better.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor
Tests