feat : adds R2DBC Test #1627
feat : adds R2DBC Test #1627
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several enhancements to a reactive database application using R2DBC and jOOQ. The changes include adding a Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/model/response/PostResponse.java (1)
10-10: Consider adding validation annotations for API usage.If this record is used in API responses, consider adding validation annotations (e.g.,
@NotNull,@Size) to ensure data integrity.r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/repository/PostTagRepository.java (1)
7-7: Consider adding common query methods.The interface could benefit from custom methods for common operations like:
- Finding tags by post ID
- Finding posts by tag name
- Batch operations for tag assignments
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/repository/custom/impl/CustomPostRepositoryImpl.java (1)
99-101: Enhance error logging.Consider including the full stack trace for better debugging:
- "Error fetching data query: {}", - e.getMessage())) + "Error fetching data query: {}", + e.getMessage(), + e))🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample
[warning] Code contains unchecked or unsafe operations
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/service/PostService.java (1)
Line range hint
136-141: Enhance debug logging.Consider adding more context to the debug log:
log.debug( - "findByKeyword with sanitizedKeyword :{} with offset :{} and limit :{}", - sanitizedKeyword, - pageable.getOffset(), - pageable.getPageSize()); + "findByKeyword [keyword: {}, sanitized: {}, page: {}, size: {}, sort: {}]", + keyword, + sanitizedKeyword, + pageable.getPageNumber(), + pageable.getPageSize(), + pageable.getSort());r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/respository/PostRepositoryTest.java (2)
80-90: Consider using Flux.merge for parallel comment insertion.Currently using Flux.concat which processes comments sequentially. Since comment order doesn't matter here, consider using Flux.merge for potential performance improvement.
- Flux.concat( + Flux.merge(
148-170: Add test cases for error scenarios.The current test only covers the happy path. Consider adding test cases for:
- Invalid post data
- Duplicate tags
- Missing relationships
Would you like me to help generate additional test cases?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/model/response/PostResponse.java(1 hunks)r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/repository/PostTagRepository.java(1 hunks)r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/repository/custom/impl/CustomPostRepositoryImpl.java(4 hunks)r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/service/PostService.java(1 hunks)r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/respository/PostRepositoryTest.java(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/repository/custom/impl/CustomPostRepositoryImpl.java
[warning] Code contains unchecked or unsafe operations
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/respository/PostRepositoryTest.java
[error] 58-58: Compilation error: void cannot be dereferenced
🔇 Additional comments (2)
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/repository/custom/impl/CustomPostRepositoryImpl.java (1)
38-42: Improved search condition construction.The new approach using
DSL.concatfor search value construction is cleaner and more efficient than string concatenation.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample
[warning] Code contains unchecked or unsafe operations
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/respository/PostRepositoryTest.java (1)
28-41: LGTM! Well-structured test class setup.The test class is properly configured with @DataR2dbcTest and necessary dependencies are correctly imported and autowired.
...le/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/repository/custom/impl/CustomPostRepositoryImpl.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/service/PostService.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...t-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/respository/PostRepositoryTest.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...t-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/respository/PostRepositoryTest.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/entities/Comment.java (2)
34-69: Consider architectural consistency with Lombok usage.The implementation mixes Lombok annotations (@builder) with manual getter/setter implementations. This creates a redundant builder pattern as both @builder and manual method chaining are present. Consider either:
- Fully embracing Lombok by using @Getter/@Setter/@builder
- Removing @builder and relying on your manual builder pattern
- Making the entity immutable using @value and a dedicated builder class
Example of option 1 (Lombok approach):
@ToString @Builder @NoArgsConstructor @AllArgsConstructor +@Getter +@Setter @Table(value = "post_comments") public class Comment { // ... fields ... - // Remove all manual getter/setter methods }Example of option 3 (Immutable approach):
-@ToString -@Builder -@NoArgsConstructor -@AllArgsConstructor +@Value +@With @Table(value = "post_comments") public class Comment { // ... fields ... - // Remove all setter methods, keep getters if not using @Value }
39-42: Consider immutability for R2DBC entities.The current implementation allows mutable state through setters. In a reactive application using R2DBC, immutable entities can provide better thread safety and prevent accidental state modifications during reactive operations.
If mutability is required, consider documenting why the entity needs to be mutable and ensure thread safety in reactive streams.
Also applies to: 48-51, 57-60, 66-69
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/entities/Post.java (2)
Line range hint
18-22: Consider full manual implementation over mixed Lombok usageWhile explicit getters/setters improve control and readability, mixing them with Lombok annotations (@builder, @NoArgsConstructor, etc.) creates an inconsistent approach. Consider either:
- Returning to full Lombok usage with @Getter/@Setter
- Implementing all methods manually including constructors and builder
54-124: Well-implemented fluent interface patternThe getter/setter implementations follow a consistent pattern with good method chaining support. Consider adding
@NonNullannotations on setters for required fields like 'title' and 'content' to enforce null-safety at compile time.Example for adding null-safety:
+ import org.springframework.lang.NonNull; public Post setTitle(@NonNull String title) { this.title = title; return this; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/entities/Comment.java(1 hunks)r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/entities/Post.java(1 hunks)r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/service/PostService.java(1 hunks)r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/respository/PostRepositoryTest.java(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/service/PostService.java
- r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/respository/PostRepositoryTest.java
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (2)
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/entities/Post.java (2)
Line range hint
23-52: Well-structured entity fields with proper annotationsGood use of Spring Data annotations for auditing (@createdby, @CreatedDate), versioning (@Version), and column mapping. The @Builder.Default for status field ensures safe initialization.
Line range hint
18-22: Verify impact of Lombok annotation removalLet's verify that all necessary methods are explicitly implemented after removing @Getter/@Setter.
✅ Verification successful
Ensure default Status.DRAFT is handled in constructor
The removal of Lombok annotations is safe as all getters and setters are already explicitly implemented. However, when removing @builder annotation, ensure the Status.DRAFT default value (currently handled by @Builder.Default) is moved to the no-args constructor.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for potential usage of methods that might have been generated by Lombok # but are now removed # Look for potential builder usage patterns that might need updates rg -l "Post\\.builder\\(\\)" --type java # Look for any direct field access that might have relied on Lombok rg -l "post\\.(id|title|content|status|createdAt|createdBy|updatedAt|version)[^(]" --type java # Look for any test files that might need updates fd -e java -x rg -l "Post" {} \; | grep "Test"Length of output: 4216
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the exact Post class being modified and its implementation echo "=== Post class location ===" fd -p "boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample.*Post.java$" echo -e "\n=== Current Post class implementation ===" cat r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/entities/Post.java echo -e "\n=== Direct references to this specific Post class ===" rg -l "com.example.jooq.r2dbc.entities.Post" --type javaLength of output: 3751
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for builder pattern usage in this specific module echo "=== Builder pattern usage in boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample ===" rg "Post\.builder\(\)" r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/ -A 2 echo -e "\n=== Verify if there are any other Lombok-generated methods being used ===" rg -e "new Post\(" -e "@Builder\.Default" r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/Length of output: 724
github-actions
bot
added
the
type: dependency-upgrade
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (9)
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/model/response/PostResponse.java (1)
10-11: Consider using an enum for the status field.Using a String for the status field could lead to inconsistencies. Consider creating an enum to represent the possible post statuses, which would provide type safety and prevent invalid status values.
- String status, + PostStatus status,r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/common/ContainerConfig.java (2)
15-15: Consider using a specific version tag for PostgreSQL container.While using the latest minor version (17.2-alpine) is good, consider pinning to a specific version to ensure test reproducibility across different environments.
- return new PostgreSQLContainer<>(DockerImageName.parse("postgres").withTag("17.2-alpine")); + return new PostgreSQLContainer<>(DockerImageName.parse("postgres:17.2-alpine"));
14-16: Consider adding container configuration best practices.The container configuration could benefit from additional settings for better test reliability and performance:
PostgreSQLContainer<?> postgreSQLContainer() { - return new PostgreSQLContainer<>(DockerImageName.parse("postgres").withTag("17.2-alpine")); + return new PostgreSQLContainer<>(DockerImageName.parse("postgres:17.2-alpine")) + .withReuse(true) // Reuse container across test runs + .withCommand("postgres -c fsync=off") // Disable fsync for test performance + .withTmpFs(Collections.singletonMap("/var/lib/postgresql/data", "rw")); // Use tmpfs for better performance }r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/entities/Post.java (2)
Line range hint
17-44: Add Javadoc documentation for entity fieldsConsider adding Javadoc documentation to describe:
- The purpose and constraints of each field
- The meaning of different Status values
- The auditing behavior (@CreatedDate, @LastModifiedDate)
49-119: Consider adding validation in settersWhile the implementation is good, consider adding:
- Null checks for critical fields like title and content
- Special handling for version field to prevent manual modifications
Example improvement:
public Post setTitle(String title) { + if (title == null || title.trim().isEmpty()) { + throw new IllegalArgumentException("Title cannot be null or empty"); + } this.title = title; return this; }r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/entities/Comment.java (1)
31-38: Consider adding validation and making the entity immutable.While the builder-style setters are a good pattern, consider:
- Adding validation in setters (especially for content)
- Making the entity immutable since it's used in a reactive context
Example implementation:
public class Comment { - private String content; + @NotNull + @Size(min = 1, max = 1000) + private final String content; - public Comment setContent(String content) { - this.content = content; - return this; + private Comment(Builder builder) { + this.id = builder.id; + this.content = Objects.requireNonNull(builder.content, "Content cannot be null"); + this.createdAt = builder.createdAt; + this.postId = Objects.requireNonNull(builder.postId, "PostId cannot be null"); } + public static class Builder { + private UUID id; + private String content; + private LocalDateTime createdAt; + private UUID postId; + + public Builder content(String content) { + this.content = content; + return this; + } + // ... other builder methods + + public Comment build() { + return new Comment(this); + } + }Also applies to: 40-47, 49-56, 58-65
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/respository/PostRepositoryTest.java (3)
43-53: Add error handling to cleanup method.While the cleanup sequence correctly handles foreign key constraints, consider adding error handling and timeout:
@BeforeEach void cleanup() { // Ensure existing data is deleted StepVerifier.create( postTagRepository .deleteAll() .then(tagRepository.deleteAll()) .then(postCommentRepository.deleteAll()) .then(postRepository.deleteAll())) + .expectSubscription() + .expectComplete() + .verify(Duration.ofSeconds(10)); }
58-94: Consider breaking down the complex setup into helper methods.The test setup involves multiple steps that could be extracted into reusable helper methods for better maintainability.
+ private Mono<UUID> createPostWithTag(String title, String content, String tagName) { + return postRepository + .save(new Post().setTitle(title).setContent(content)) + .flatMap(post -> + tagRepository + .save(new Tags().setName(tagName)) + .flatMap(tag -> + postTagRepository + .save(new PostTagRelation(post.getId(), tag.getId())) + .thenReturn(post.getId()) + ) + ); + } + + private Flux<Comment> createComments(UUID postId, String... contents) { + return Flux.fromArray(contents) + .flatMap(content -> + postCommentRepository.save( + new Comment() + .setPostId(postId) + .setContent(content)) + ); + }
183-263: Good test coverage with edge case!The test effectively covers the case of a post without comments or tags. Consider adding more edge cases:
- Post with tags but no comments
- Post with comments but no tags
- Post with multiple tags
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/pom.xml(1 hunks)r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/entities/Comment.java(1 hunks)r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/entities/Post.java(1 hunks)r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/model/response/PostResponse.java(1 hunks)r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/repository/custom/impl/CustomPostRepositoryImpl.java(4 hunks)r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/service/PostService.java(1 hunks)r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/resources/db/migration/postgresql/V1__01_init.sql(1 hunks)r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/common/ContainerConfig.java(1 hunks)r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/respository/PostRepositoryTest.java(1 hunks)r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/resources/init.sql(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/resources/init.sql
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/resources/db/migration/postgresql/V1__01_init.sql
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/service/PostService.java
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/repository/custom/impl/CustomPostRepositoryImpl.java (1)
Learnt from: rajadilipkolli
PR: rajadilipkolli/my-spring-boot-experiments#1627
File: r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/repository/custom/impl/CustomPostRepositoryImpl.java:86-96
Timestamp: 2025-01-08T16:38:06.730Z
Learning: In jOOQ, use generic type parameters with `record.get()` method for type-safe record mapping (e.g., `record.<List<String>>get("field")`). For multiset conversions, use `records.into(Class)` pattern (e.g., `records.into(PostCommentResponse.class)`).
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
- GitHub Check: Run Unit & Integration Tests
🔇 Additional comments (11)
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/repository/custom/impl/CustomPostRepositoryImpl.java (3)
37-41: LGTM! Improved search value construction.The use of
DSL.concatfor constructing the search value is a cleaner approach than string concatenation. The LIKE query is properly constructed with wildcards.
47-51: LGTM! Query fields aligned with PostResponse.The query now includes
CREATED_BYandSTATUSfields, properly aligned with the changes inPostResponse. The comments improve code readability.
89-95: LGTM! Enhanced error handling.Error handling has been improved with more specific error messages and consolidated error logging for both data and count queries.
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/pom.xml (1)
339-344: LGTM! Added SQL formatting configuration.The addition of SQL formatting using DBeaver in the spotless plugin will help maintain consistent SQL file formatting across the project.
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/common/ContainerConfig.java (1)
14-16: Verify database initialization strategy.The removal of initialization scripts might affect test data setup. Consider:
- How is the database schema being initialized now?
- How are test data being populated?
- Is the uuid-ossp extension still needed?
Let's verify the database initialization strategy:
✅ Verification successful
Database initialization is properly managed ✅
The database initialization is handled through Flyway migrations in
src/main/resources/db/migration/postgresql/V1__01_init.sql, which includes:
- Schema creation for all required tables
- UUID extension setup
- All necessary constraints
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any SQL initialization files in the test resources fd -e sql . src/test/resources # Check for any programmatic schema initialization rg -l "CREATE TABLE|CREATE EXTENSION" src/test/javaLength of output: 246
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for SQL files in the entire project fd -e sql # Look for database initialization patterns rg -l "CREATE TABLE|CREATE EXTENSION|uuid_generate|Flyway|Liquibase|@Sql|@DataJpaTest|@JooqTest" # Check for schema.sql or data.sql fd "schema.sql|data.sql" # Look for test setup methods ast-grep --pattern 'void setUp() { $$$ }'Length of output: 4983
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check content of the migration file cat r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/resources/db/migration/postgresql/V1__01_init.sql # Look for Flyway configuration rg -l "spring.flyway" r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/Length of output: 1617
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/entities/Post.java (3)
47-47: LGTM! Required no-args constructor is presentThe default constructor is correctly implemented for R2DBC entity instantiation.
Line range hint
1-119: Verify R2DBC entity requirementsThe class looks well-structured for R2DBC usage. To ensure completeness, verify:
- All necessary indexes are defined in the database schema
- Optimistic locking works correctly with the version field
- Auditing fields are properly populated
✅ Verification successful
R2DBC entity implementation verified successfully
The Post entity is correctly implemented with:
- Complete schema definition with proper constraints
- Working optimistic locking via @Version
- Configured auditing fields with @EnableR2dbcAuditing
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for database schema definition fd -e sql | xargs rg -l "CREATE TABLE.*posts" # Check for R2DBC configuration fd -e java -e properties -e yml | xargs rg -l "r2dbc" # Check for auditing configuration fd -e java | xargs rg -l "EnableR2dbcAuditing"Length of output: 8571
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check schema.sql or similar files in r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample fd schema.sql migration .sql -p r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample | xargs cat # Backup check for schema in other potential locations fd -e sql -p r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample | xargs catLength of output: 1557
Line range hint
13-15: Review @tostring usage for potential sensitive data exposureThe @tostring annotation might expose sensitive content in logs. Consider either:
- Excluding sensitive fields using @ToString.Exclude
- Implementing a custom toString() method with masked sensitive data
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/entities/Comment.java (2)
29-30: LGTM! Default constructor added for JPA/Spring Data.The default constructor is required for frameworks to instantiate the entity.
Line range hint
1-65: Verify R2DBC compatibility with entity design.Since this is part of an R2DBC application (reactive database access), ensure that:
- The entity design follows R2DBC best practices
- The mutable state won't cause issues in reactive streams
✅ Verification successful
R2DBC entity design is correct and follows best practices
The Comment entity:
- Uses appropriate R2DBC annotations
- Has a safe mutable state design with controlled mutations
- Follows the same patterns as other R2DBC entities in the codebase
- Contains no blocking operations that could affect reactive streams
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for R2DBC entity patterns and reactive repository usage rg -l "extends ReactiveCrudRepository|@EnableR2dbcRepositories" # Check if there are similar entity patterns in the codebase ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ { @Id private UUID $_; $$$ }'Length of output: 630
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for other entities in the same package and their patterns fd -e java -p "entities|domain" --exec cat {} \; # Look for R2DBC configuration classes rg -l "R2dbc.*Configuration|@EnableR2dbc|DatabaseClient" # Check repository usage patterns rg -A 5 "Comment.*Repository"Length of output: 65735
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/respository/PostRepositoryTest.java (1)
29-41: Well-structured test class setup!Good use of @DataR2dbcTest with containerized testing and clean dependency organization.
...t-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/respository/PostRepositoryTest.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...t-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/respository/PostRepositoryTest.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (9)
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/repository/custom/impl/CustomPostRepositoryImpl.java (2)
45-66: Consider standardizing error messages.The error messages are slightly inconsistent:
- Line 52: "Error fetching data query"
- Line 59: "Error executing queries"
Consider using consistent terminology across error messages.
- "Error fetching data query: {}", + "Error executing data query: {}",
68-68: Consider reducing method visibility.The
public staticmethod suggests it's used across different contexts. If this method is only used within the package, consider making it package-private to reduce unnecessary exposure of implementation details.- public static Flux<PostResponse> retrievePostsWithCommentsAndTags( + static Flux<PostResponse> retrievePostsWithCommentsAndTags(r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/respository/PostRepositoryTest.java (4)
54-121: Consider extracting test data to constants.While the test is comprehensive, consider extracting test data to constants for better maintainability:
+ private static final String TEST_TITLE = "jooq test"; + private static final String TEST_CONTENT = "content of Jooq test"; + private static final String TEST_TAG = "java"; + private static final String TEST_COMMENT_1 = "test comments"; + private static final String TEST_COMMENT_2 = "test comments 2";
89-121: Consider breaking down assertions into separate methods.The verification block contains many assertions. Consider extracting them into separate methods for better readability:
+ private void verifyPostData(PostResponse postResponse) { + assertThat(postResponse.id()).isInstanceOf(UUID.class); + assertThat(postResponse.title()).isEqualTo(TEST_TITLE); + // ... other post assertions + } + + private void verifyComments(List<PostCommentResponse> comments) { + // ... comment assertions + }
123-150: Consider reducing duplication with the first test.This test shares common setup and assertions with the first test. Consider extracting common logic:
+ private Flux<PostResponse> createBasicPost() { + return postRepository + .save(new Post().setTitle(TEST_TITLE).setContent(TEST_CONTENT)); + } + + private void verifyBasicPostData(PostResponse postResponse) { + assertThat(postResponse.id()).isInstanceOf(UUID.class); + assertThat(postResponse.title()).isEqualTo(TEST_TITLE); + // ... other common assertions + }
152-158: Well-implemented helper method!The createComments method is clean and focused. Consider adding validation for the input parameters:
private Flux<Comment> createComments(UUID postId, String... contents) { + if (postId == null || contents == null || contents.length == 0) { + return Flux.error(new IllegalArgumentException("Invalid parameters")); + } return Flux.fromArray(contents)r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/config/Initializer.java (3)
3-3: Consider avoiding static import for better code clarity.Static imports can make the code harder to understand by obscuring the method's source. Consider using a regular import and calling the method through the class name.
-import static com.example.jooq.r2dbc.repository.custom.impl.CustomPostRepositoryImpl.retrievePostsWithCommentsAndTags; +import com.example.jooq.r2dbc.repository.custom.impl.CustomPostRepositoryImpl;
32-32: Improve logging message format.The logging message uses multiple dots which is not a common practice. Consider using a more concise format.
- log.info("Running Initializer to use JOOQ only....."); + log.info("Running Initializer with JOOQ");
Line range hint
31-93: Consider architectural improvements for database initialization.The current implementation could benefit from several architectural improvements:
- Consider wrapping the entire initialization in a transaction for atomicity
- Separate cleanup and setup logic into distinct methods for better maintainability
- Make the initialization configurable based on the environment (dev, test, prod)
Would you like me to provide an example of how to implement these improvements?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/config/Initializer.java(3 hunks)r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/repository/custom/impl/CustomPostRepositoryImpl.java(2 hunks)r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/respository/PostRepositoryTest.java(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/repository/custom/impl/CustomPostRepositoryImpl.java (1)
Learnt from: rajadilipkolli
PR: rajadilipkolli/my-spring-boot-experiments#1627
File: r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/repository/custom/impl/CustomPostRepositoryImpl.java:86-96
Timestamp: 2025-01-08T16:38:06.730Z
Learning: In jOOQ, use generic type parameters with `record.get()` method for type-safe record mapping (e.g., `record.<List<String>>get("field")`). For multiset conversions, use `records.into(Class)` pattern (e.g., `records.into(PostCommentResponse.class)`).
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/config/Initializer.java (1)
Learnt from: rajadilipkolli
PR: rajadilipkolli/my-spring-boot-experiments#1627
File: r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/repository/custom/impl/CustomPostRepositoryImpl.java:86-96
Timestamp: 2025-01-08T16:38:06.730Z
Learning: In jOOQ, use generic type parameters with `record.get()` method for type-safe record mapping (e.g., `record.<List<String>>get("field")`). For multiset conversions, use `records.into(Class)` pattern (e.g., `records.into(PostCommentResponse.class)`).
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (5)
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/repository/custom/impl/CustomPostRepositoryImpl.java (3)
13-13: LGTM!The addition of
org.jooq.Fieldimport is appropriate for the new type-safe field operations.
37-41: LGTM! Improved type-safe search condition construction.The new implementation using
DSL.concatandField<String>is more idiomatic to jOOQ and provides better type safety.
79-116: Excellent implementation of efficient data retrieval!The implementation demonstrates several good practices:
- Uses multiset operations to fetch related data in a single query
- Properly handles type conversion with jOOQ's
into()andconvertFrom()- Well-structured joins and conditions for tags retrieval
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/respository/PostRepositoryTest.java (2)
1-39: Well-structured test class setup!The test class is properly configured with @DataR2dbcTest and necessary dependencies. The use of ContainerConfig suggests proper containerized testing.
40-52: Excellent cleanup implementation!The cleanup method properly handles data deletion in the correct order, respecting foreign key constraints. The StepVerifier with timeout ensures reliable test execution.
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/config/Initializer.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/config/Initializer.java (2)
93-95: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionUpdate error logging level and enhance error handling
Currently, errors are being logged at
DEBUGlevel in the error callback of thesubscribemethod. For better visibility of errors in production, consider logging atERRORlevel. Additionally, enhancing the error handling can improve the robustness of the application.Apply this diff to update the logging level and improve error handling:
.subscribe( data -> log.debug("Retrieved data: {}", data), - error -> log.debug("error: ", error), + error -> { + log.error("Failed to retrieve posts with comments and tags", error); + // Consider adding error metrics or alerting here + }, () -> log.debug("done"));
93-93: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionClarify the purpose of passing
nulltoretrievePostsWithCommentsAndTagsPassing
nullas a parameter toretrievePostsWithCommentsAndTagsmay lead to potential issues or unintended behavior. Consider overloading the method to provide a default behavior when the condition isnull, or clearly document the purpose of passingnull.
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/repository/custom/impl/CustomPostRepositoryImpl.java (1)
74-113: Consider extracting multiset queries for better readability.While the implementation is correct and follows type-safe record mapping, consider extracting the multiset queries into separate methods for improved readability:
public Flux<PostResponse> retrievePostsWithCommentsAndTags(Condition condition) { Condition whereCondition = condition != null ? condition : DSL.trueCondition(); return Flux.from( dslContext .select( POSTS.ID, POSTS.TITLE, POSTS.CONTENT, POSTS.CREATED_BY, POSTS.STATUS, - DSL.multiset( - DSL.select( - POST_COMMENTS.ID, - POST_COMMENTS.CONTENT, - POST_COMMENTS.CREATED_AT) - .from(POST_COMMENTS) - .where(POST_COMMENTS.POST_ID.eq(POSTS.ID))) - .as("comments") - .convertFrom(record -> record.into(PostCommentResponse.class)), - DSL.multiset( - DSL.select(TAGS.NAME) - .from(TAGS) - .join(POSTS_TAGS) - .on(TAGS.ID.eq(POSTS_TAGS.TAG_ID)) - .where(POSTS_TAGS.POST_ID.eq(POSTS.ID))) - .as("tags") - .convertFrom(record -> record.map(Record1::value1))) + getCommentsMultiset(), + getTagsMultiset()) .from(POSTS) .where(whereCondition) .orderBy(POSTS.CREATED_AT)) .map(record -> record.into(PostResponse.class)); } + + private Field<?> getCommentsMultiset() { + return DSL.multiset( + DSL.select( + POST_COMMENTS.ID, + POST_COMMENTS.CONTENT, + POST_COMMENTS.CREATED_AT) + .from(POST_COMMENTS) + .where(POST_COMMENTS.POST_ID.eq(POSTS.ID))) + .as("comments") + .convertFrom(record -> record.into(PostCommentResponse.class)); + } + + private Field<?> getTagsMultiset() { + return DSL.multiset( + DSL.select(TAGS.NAME) + .from(TAGS) + .join(POSTS_TAGS) + .on(TAGS.ID.eq(POSTS_TAGS.TAG_ID)) + .where(POSTS_TAGS.POST_ID.eq(POSTS.ID))) + .as("tags") + .convertFrom(record -> record.map(Record1::value1)); + }r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/config/Initializer.java (1)
37-37: Standardize log message formattingThe log message contains multiple periods, which may be inconsistent with standard logging practices. Consider removing the extra periods for consistency.
Apply this diff to standardize the log message:
-log.info("Running Initializer to use JOOQ only....."); +log.info("Running Initializer to use JOOQ only...");r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/respository/PostRepositoryTest.java (3)
41-53: Consider increasing the verification timeout.The cleanup operation uses a 10-second timeout which might be insufficient for larger datasets. Consider making the timeout configurable or increasing it to handle varying data volumes.
- .verify(Duration.ofSeconds(10)); + .verify(Duration.ofSeconds(30));
109-131: Enhance assertions for better test specificity.The test verifies empty collections but could be more specific about the post's state.
verifyBasicPostResponse(postResponse); assertThat(postResponse.comments()).isEmpty(); assertThat(postResponse.tags()).isEmpty(); + assertThat(postResponse.createdAt()).isNotNull() + .isCloseTo(LocalDateTime.now(), within(1, ChronoUnit.MINUTES));
133-163: Add input validation to helper methods.The helper methods could be more robust with input validation and more flexible parameters.
private Mono<Post> createPost() { + return createPost("jooq test", "content of Jooq test"); + } + + private Mono<Post> createPost(String title, String content) { + if (title == null || content == null) { + return Mono.error(new IllegalArgumentException("Title and content must not be null")); + } return postRepository.save( - new Post().setTitle("jooq test").setContent("content of Jooq test")); + new Post().setTitle(title).setContent(content)); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/config/Initializer.java(2 hunks)r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/model/response/PostResponse.java(1 hunks)r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/repository/custom/CustomPostRepository.java(1 hunks)r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/repository/custom/impl/CustomPostRepositoryImpl.java(2 hunks)r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/respository/PostRepositoryTest.java(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/model/response/PostResponse.java
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/repository/custom/impl/CustomPostRepositoryImpl.java (1)
Learnt from: rajadilipkolli
PR: rajadilipkolli/my-spring-boot-experiments#1627
File: r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/repository/custom/impl/CustomPostRepositoryImpl.java:86-96
Timestamp: 2025-01-08T16:38:06.730Z
Learning: In jOOQ, use generic type parameters with `record.get()` method for type-safe record mapping (e.g., `record.<List<String>>get("field")`). For multiset conversions, use `records.into(Class)` pattern (e.g., `records.into(PostCommentResponse.class)`).
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (4)
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/repository/custom/CustomPostRepository.java (1)
4-4: LGTM! Well-designed interface extension.The new method
retrievePostsWithCommentsAndTagsis a good addition that:
- Provides flexibility through the
Conditionparameter- Returns a reactive stream with
Flux- Maintains consistency with the reactive programming model
Also applies to: 7-7, 12-13
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/repository/custom/impl/CustomPostRepositoryImpl.java (2)
37-41: LGTM! Clean refactoring of the query construction and execution.The changes improve code quality by:
- Using jOOQ's DSL more effectively for condition building
- Reducing duplication through method extraction
- Maintaining comprehensive error handling
Also applies to: 45-60
64-72: LGTM! Robust condition handling.The implementation properly handles conditions by:
- Using
DSL.trueCondition()as a safe default- Properly handling null conditions
- Following jOOQ best practices
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/respository/PostRepositoryTest.java (1)
27-40: Well-structured test class setup!The test class follows Spring testing best practices with proper annotations and dependency injection. The separation of repositories for different entities promotes good testing isolation.
| @Test | ||
| void testInsertPostViaR2dbcAndRetrieveViaDSLContext() { | ||
|
|
||
| Flux<PostResponse> postResponseFlux = | ||
| // Step 1: Insert a new post | ||
| createPost() | ||
| .flatMap( | ||
| post -> { | ||
| UUID postId = post.getId(); | ||
|
|
||
| // Step 2: Insert a new tag | ||
| return tagRepository | ||
| .save(new Tags().setName("java")) | ||
| .flatMap( | ||
| tag -> { | ||
| UUID tagId = tag.getId(); | ||
|
|
||
| // Step 3: Link post and tag | ||
| return postTagRepository | ||
| .save( | ||
| new PostTagRelation( | ||
| postId, tagId)) | ||
| .thenReturn(postId); | ||
| }); | ||
| }) | ||
|
|
||
| // Step 4: Insert comments | ||
| .flatMapMany( | ||
| postId -> | ||
| createComments(postId, "test comments", "test comments 2")) | ||
| .thenMany( | ||
| // Step 5: Retrieve data using jOOQ | ||
| Flux.from(postRepository.retrievePostsWithCommentsAndTags(null))); | ||
|
|
||
| StepVerifier.create(postResponseFlux) | ||
| .expectNextMatches( | ||
| postResponse -> { | ||
| // Assertions for post data | ||
| verifyBasicPostResponse(postResponse); | ||
| assertThat(postResponse.comments()).isNotEmpty().hasSize(2); | ||
| assertThat(postResponse.tags()).isNotEmpty().hasSize(1); | ||
|
|
||
| // Assertions for | ||
| assertPostComments(postResponse); | ||
|
|
||
| // Assertions for tags | ||
| assertThat(postResponse.tags().getFirst()).isEqualTo("java"); | ||
|
|
||
| return true; | ||
| }) | ||
| .expectComplete() | ||
| .verify(); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error scenario testing and transaction boundary.
While the happy path is well tested, consider:
- Adding error scenario tests (e.g., duplicate tags, invalid data)
- Using
@Transactionalto ensure test data isolation
+ @Test
+ void testInsertPostWithInvalidDataShouldFail() {
+ StepVerifier.create(
+ postRepository.save(
+ new Post().setTitle("").setContent("")))
+ .expectError(IllegalArgumentException.class)
+ .verify();
+ }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| // Step 2: Insert a new tag | ||
| return tagRepository | ||
| .save(new Tags().setName("java")) | ||
| .flatMap( | ||
| tag -> { | ||
| UUID tagId = tag.getId(); | ||
|
|
||
| // Step 3: Link post and tag | ||
| return postTagRepository | ||
| .save( | ||
| new PostTagRelation( | ||
| postId, tagId)) | ||
| .thenReturn(postId); | ||
| }); | ||
| }) | ||
|
|
||
| // Step 4: Insert comments | ||
| .flatMapMany( | ||
| postId -> | ||
| createComments(postId, "test comments", "test comments 2")) | ||
| .thenMany( | ||
| // Step 5: Retrieve data using jOOQ | ||
| Flux.from(postRepository.retrievePostsWithCommentsAndTags(null))); | ||
|
|
||
| StepVerifier.create(postResponseFlux) | ||
| .expectNextMatches( | ||
| postResponse -> { | ||
| // Assertions for post data | ||
| verifyBasicPostResponse(postResponse); | ||
| assertThat(postResponse.comments()).isNotEmpty().hasSize(2); | ||
| assertThat(postResponse.tags()).isNotEmpty().hasSize(1); | ||
|
|
||
| // Assertions for | ||
| assertPostComments(postResponse); | ||
|
|
||
| // Assertions for tags | ||
| assertThat(postResponse.tags().getFirst()).isEqualTo("java"); | ||
|
|
||
| return true; | ||
| }) | ||
| .expectComplete() | ||
| .verify(); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Test | ||
| void testInsertPostOnlyViaR2dbcAndRetrieveViaDSLContext() { | ||
|
|
||
| Flux<PostResponse> postResponseFlux = | ||
| // Step 1: Insert a new post | ||
| createPost() | ||
| .thenMany( | ||
| // Step 2: Retrieve data using jOOQ | ||
| postRepository.retrievePostsWithCommentsAndTags(null)); | ||
|
|
||
| StepVerifier.create(postResponseFlux) | ||
| .expectNextMatches( | ||
| postResponse -> { | ||
| // Assertions for post data | ||
| verifyBasicPostResponse(postResponse); | ||
| assertThat(postResponse.comments()).isEmpty(); | ||
| assertThat(postResponse.tags()).isEmpty(); | ||
|
|
||
| return true; | ||
| }) | ||
| .expectComplete() | ||
| .verify(); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| private Mono<Post> createPost() { | ||
| return postRepository.save( | ||
| new Post().setTitle("jooq test").setContent("content of Jooq test")); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| private void verifyBasicPostResponse(PostResponse postResponse) { | ||
| assertThat(postResponse.id()).isInstanceOf(UUID.class); | ||
| assertThat(postResponse.title()).isEqualTo("jooq test"); | ||
| assertThat(postResponse.content()).isEqualTo("content of Jooq test"); | ||
| assertThat(postResponse.createdBy()).isEqualTo("appUser"); | ||
| assertThat(postResponse.status()).isEqualTo(Status.DRAFT); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| private void assertPostComments(PostResponse postResponse) { | ||
| PostCommentResponse postCommentResponse = postResponse.comments().getFirst(); | ||
| assertThat(postCommentResponse.id()).isInstanceOf(UUID.class); | ||
| assertThat(postCommentResponse.createdAt()).isNotNull().isInstanceOf(LocalDateTime.class); | ||
| assertThat(postCommentResponse.content()).isEqualTo("test comments"); | ||
| PostCommentResponse last = postResponse.comments().getLast(); | ||
| assertThat(last.id()).isInstanceOf(UUID.class); | ||
| assertThat(last.createdAt()).isNotNull(); | ||
| assertThat(last.content()).isEqualTo("test comments 2"); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| private Flux<Comment> createComments(UUID postId, String... contents) { | ||
| return Flux.fromArray(contents) | ||
| .flatMap( | ||
| content -> | ||
| postCommentRepository.save( | ||
| new Comment().setPostId(postId).setContent(content))); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Add tests for database constraints and concurrent modifications
The codebase has several untested constraints that could cause runtime issues:
- Test unique constraint violation on tag names
- Test optimistic locking with concurrent post updates (using version field)
- Test foreign key constraint violations when saving comments
- Test maximum content length for text fields
🔗 Analysis chain
Consider adding more edge cases and error scenarios.
While the test coverage is good for happy paths, consider adding tests for:
- Concurrent operations
- Boundary conditions (e.g., maximum content length)
- Race conditions in reactive chains
- Database constraint violations
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for existing error scenario tests
rg -B 2 -A 2 "expectError|throws|catch" --type java
Length of output: 74670
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for entity constraints and database schema
fd -e java "Post.java|Comment.java|Tags.java" --exec cat {} \;
# Look for database schema files
fd -e sql . --exec cat {} \;
# Look for similar repository test files with error scenarios
rg -l "expectError|throws|StepVerifier" --type java | grep "Test.java"
Length of output: 38544
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@coderabbitai, please help me to test above all listed untested constraints
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@rajadilipkolli Here are the test methods to cover the untested constraints:
@Test
void testUniqueTagNameConstraintViolation() {
// Create first tag
Mono<Tags> firstTag = tagRepository.save(new Tags().setName("java"));
// Try to create second tag with same name
Mono<Tags> secondTag = firstTag
.then(tagRepository.save(new Tags().setName("java")));
StepVerifier.create(secondTag)
.expectErrorMatches(throwable ->
throwable instanceof DataIntegrityViolationException &&
throwable.getMessage().contains("unique constraint"))
.verify();
}
@Test
void testOptimisticLockingOnConcurrentPostUpdates() {
// Create initial post
Mono<Post> initialPost = postRepository.save(
new Post()
.setTitle("original")
.setContent("content")
.setVersion((short) 1));
// Simulate concurrent updates
Mono<Post> update1 = initialPost
.flatMap(post -> {
post.setTitle("update1");
return postRepository.save(post);
});
Mono<Post> update2 = initialPost
.flatMap(post -> {
post.setTitle("update2");
return postRepository.save(post);
});
StepVerifier.create(update1.then(update2))
.expectErrorMatches(throwable ->
throwable instanceof OptimisticLockingFailureException)
.verify();
}
@Test
void testForeignKeyConstraintViolation() {
// Try to save comment with non-existent post ID
Mono<Comment> invalidComment = postCommentRepository.save(
new Comment()
.setPostId(UUID.randomUUID()) // Random non-existent ID
.setContent("test comment"));
StepVerifier.create(invalidComment)
.expectErrorMatches(throwable ->
throwable instanceof DataIntegrityViolationException &&
throwable.getMessage().contains("foreign key constraint"))
.verify();
}
@Test
void testContentLengthValidation() {
// Generate content exceeding max length
String longContent = "a".repeat(10001); // Assuming 10000 is max
Mono<Post> invalidPost = postRepository.save(
new Post()
.setTitle("test")
.setContent(longContent));
StepVerifier.create(invalidPost)
.expectErrorMatches(throwable ->
throwable instanceof DataIntegrityViolationException &&
throwable.getMessage().contains("value too long"))
.verify();
}These tests cover:
- Unique constraint violation when creating tags with duplicate names
- Optimistic locking failure during concurrent post updates
- Foreign key constraint violation when saving comments
- Content length validation for text fields
Add these methods to your PostRepositoryTest class. Each test verifies that appropriate exceptions are thrown when constraints are violated.
Let me know if you need any clarification or have questions about the test implementations.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/entities/Post.java (1)
Line range hint
3-14: Consider implementing equals/hashCode methodsThe class has
@ToStringbut lacksequalsandhashCodeimplementations. For proper object comparison and collection operations, especially in a database context, these methods should be implemented.Would you like me to generate an implementation based on the business key fields?
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/config/Initializer.java (1)
93-97:⚠️ Potential issueImprove error handling and logging.
The previous review comments about error handling and logging are still applicable:
- Error logging should be at ERROR level instead of DEBUG
- The purpose of the
nullparameter is unclear- Error handling needs to be more robust
Apply this diff to improve the error handling:
- .thenMany(postRepository.retrievePostsWithCommentsAndTags(null)) + .thenMany(postRepository.retrievePostsWithCommentsAndTags(null)) // TODO: Document the purpose of null parameter .subscribe( data -> log.debug("Retrieved data: {}", data), - error -> log.debug("error: ", error), + error -> { + log.error("Failed to retrieve posts with comments and tags", error); + // Consider adding error metrics or alerting here + }, () -> log.debug("done"));
🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/config/Initializer.java (1)
27-32: Consider using @requiredargsconstructor for cleaner dependency injection.While the current constructor implementation is correct, you could simplify it using Lombok's
@RequiredArgsConstructorsince all fields are final and required.@Component +@RequiredArgsConstructor public class Initializer implements CommandLineRunner { private static final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(Initializer.class); private final DSLContext dslContext; private final PostRepository postRepository; - - public Initializer(DSLContext dslContext, PostRepository postRepository) { - this.dslContext = dslContext; - this.postRepository = postRepository; - }r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/repository/custom/impl/CustomPostRepositoryImpl.java (2)
65-92: Consider adding pagination support to retrievePostsWithCommentsAndTags.While the method effectively retrieves posts with their related data, it might return a large dataset since it doesn't support pagination. This could impact performance for large result sets.
Consider adding optional pagination parameters:
- public Flux<PostResponse> retrievePostsWithCommentsAndTags(Condition condition) { + public Flux<PostResponse> retrievePostsWithCommentsAndTags(Condition condition, Pageable pageable) { // ... existing code ... return Flux.from( dslContext .select(/* ... */) .from(POSTS) .where(whereCondition) + .limit(pageable.getPageSize()) + .offset(pageable.getOffset()) .orderBy(POSTS.CREATED_AT)) .map(record -> record.into(PostResponse.class));
94-104: Consider adding ordering to comment results.The comments multiset query doesn't specify an order, which might lead to inconsistent results across multiple queries.
Add ordering to ensure consistent results:
return DSL.multiset( DSL.select( POST_COMMENTS.ID, POST_COMMENTS.CONTENT, POST_COMMENTS.CREATED_AT) .from(POST_COMMENTS) - .where(POST_COMMENTS.POST_ID.eq(POSTS.ID))) + .where(POST_COMMENTS.POST_ID.eq(POSTS.ID)) + .orderBy(POST_COMMENTS.CREATED_AT.desc()))r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/entities/Post.java (4)
48-48: Add constructor documentationConsider adding Javadoc to explain that this is a JPA requirement and document the default status initialization.
+ /** + * Default constructor required by JPA. + * Initializes a new Post with Status.DRAFT by default. + */ public Post() {}
63-66: Add null validation for critical fieldsConsider adding null checks for critical fields like title, content, and status to fail fast and provide clear error messages.
public Post setTitle(String title) { + if (title == null || title.trim().isEmpty()) { + throw new IllegalArgumentException("Title cannot be null or empty"); + } this.title = title; return this; } public Post setContent(String content) { + if (content == null) { + throw new IllegalArgumentException("Content cannot be null"); + } this.content = content; return this; } public Post setStatus(Status status) { + if (status == null) { + throw new IllegalArgumentException("Status cannot be null"); + } this.status = status; return this; }Also applies to: 72-75, 81-84
Line range hint
29-42: Consider using Integer for version fieldThe
versionfield is typed asShort, which might be limiting for high-frequency updates as it only allows 32,767 versions. Consider usingIntegerfor better scalability.- private Short version; + private Integer version;
Line range hint
29-42: Document audit fieldsAdd Javadoc to document the behavior of the audit fields, especially how they're automatically populated by Spring Data.
+ /** + * Creation timestamp, automatically managed by Spring Data. + */ @Column("created_at") @CreatedDate private LocalDateTime createdAt; + /** + * Username or ID of the creating user, automatically populated by Spring Security. + */ @Column("created_by") @CreatedBy private String createdBy; + /** + * Last modification timestamp, automatically updated by Spring Data. + */ @Column("updated_at") @LastModifiedDate private LocalDateTime updatedAt; + /** + * Optimistic locking version number, automatically managed by Spring Data. + */ @Column("version") @Version private Short version;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/config/Initializer.java(2 hunks)r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/entities/Post.java(2 hunks)r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/model/Status.java(1 hunks)r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/model/response/PostResponse.java(1 hunks)r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/repository/custom/impl/CustomPostRepositoryImpl.java(2 hunks)r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/respository/PostRepositoryTest.java(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/model/Status.java
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/test/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/respository/PostRepositoryTest.java
- r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/model/response/PostResponse.java
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/repository/custom/impl/CustomPostRepositoryImpl.java (1)
Learnt from: rajadilipkolli
PR: rajadilipkolli/my-spring-boot-experiments#1627
File: r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/repository/custom/impl/CustomPostRepositoryImpl.java:86-96
Timestamp: 2025-01-08T16:38:06.730Z
Learning: In jOOQ, use generic type parameters with `record.get()` method for type-safe record mapping (e.g., `record.<List<String>>get("field")`). For multiset conversions, use `records.into(Class)` pattern (e.g., `records.into(PostCommentResponse.class)`).
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (4)
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/config/Initializer.java (1)
9-9: LGTM! Good move to explicit logger initialization.The switch from Lombok's logger to explicit SLF4J logger initialization improves code clarity and reduces magic.
Also applies to: 16-17, 25-25
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/repository/custom/impl/CustomPostRepositoryImpl.java (2)
46-61: LGTM! Well-structured error handling and reactive composition.The error handling is well-implemented with specific error messages, and the reactive composition using
Mono.zipis clean and efficient.
106-115: LGTM! Well-implemented type-safe tags multiset.The tags multiset implementation is clean and efficient, using type-safe record mapping as recommended.
r2dbc/boot-jooq-r2dbc-sample/src/main/java/com/example/jooq/r2dbc/entities/Post.java (1)
3-3: Verify Status enum usage across codebaseThe Status enum has been moved from
entitiestomodelpackage. Let's verify all references have been updated.✅ Verification successful
Status enum import references are correctly updated
All files in the codebase are using the correct import path
com.example.jooq.r2dbc.model.Status. No references to the old location were found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining references to the old Status enum location rg -l "import.*entities\.Status" # Search for all Status enum usages to ensure consistency rg -l "import.*model\.Status"Length of output: 352
| Field<String> searchValue = DSL.concat(DSL.val("%"), DSL.val(keyword), DSL.val("%")); | ||
| Condition condition = | ||
| DSL.or( | ||
| POSTS.TITLE.likeIgnoreCase(searchValue), | ||
| POSTS.CONTENT.likeIgnoreCase(searchValue)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add input validation for the keyword parameter.
The current implementation doesn't validate the keyword parameter before using it in the search condition. This could lead to unnecessary database queries or potential SQL injection vulnerabilities.
Add validation before constructing the search condition:
+ if (keyword == null || keyword.trim().isEmpty()) {
+ return Mono.just(Page.empty(pageable));
+ }
Field<String> searchValue = DSL.concat(DSL.val("%"), DSL.val(keyword), DSL.val("%"));📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| Field<String> searchValue = DSL.concat(DSL.val("%"), DSL.val(keyword), DSL.val("%")); | |
| Condition condition = | |
| DSL.or( | |
| POSTS.TITLE.likeIgnoreCase(searchValue), | |
| POSTS.CONTENT.likeIgnoreCase(searchValue)); | |
| if (keyword == null || keyword.trim().isEmpty()) { | |
| return Mono.just(Page.empty(pageable)); | |
| } | |
| Field<String> searchValue = DSL.concat(DSL.val("%"), DSL.val(keyword), DSL.val("%")); | |
| Condition condition = | |
| DSL.or( | |
| POSTS.TITLE.likeIgnoreCase(searchValue), | |
| POSTS.CONTENT.likeIgnoreCase(searchValue)); |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
createdByandstatusfields to post response, enhancing post information.PostTagRepositoryfor managing post-tag relationships.Tests
PostRepositoryto validate data insertion and retrieval processes.Improvements
CommentandPostclasses for better clarity.