[dev-v2.11] rancher-monitoring 106.0.0+up61.3.2 update

[alexandreLamarre]

Issue:

• Charts are not available via the UI for rancher 2.11 due to incorrect annotations
• During the rebase to upstream 61.3.2 we introduced a regression related to nodeSelectors in prometheus-adapter:

rancher/rancher#48089
#5074 accidentally did not fix the issue, so introducing the fix here

Problem
Solution
Testing
Engineering Testing
Manual Testing
Automated Testing
QA Testing Considerations

Deploy chart with prometheus-adapter enabled
Deploy chart with prometheus-adapter node-selectors defined

Regressions Considerations

[github-actions]

Validation steps

• Ensure all container images have repository and tag on the same level to ensure that all container images are included in rancher-images.txt which are used by airgap customers.

  Ex:-
    longhorn-controller:
      repository: rancher/hardened-sriov-cni
      tag: v2.6.3-build20230913
  

• Add a 👍 (thumbs up) reaction to this comment once done. CI won't pass without this reaction to the github-action bot's latest validation comment.
• Approve the PR to run the CI check.

[github-actions]

Validation steps

• Ensure all container images have repository and tag on the same level to ensure that all container images are included in rancher-images.txt which are used by airgap customers.

  Ex:-
    longhorn-controller:
      repository: rancher/hardened-sriov-cni
      tag: v2.6.3-build20230913
  

• Add a 👍 (thumbs up) reaction to this comment once done. CI won't pass without this reaction to the github-action bot's latest validation comment.
• Approve the PR to run the CI check.

[github-actions]

Validation steps

• Ensure all container images have repository and tag on the same level to ensure that all container images are included in rancher-images.txt which are used by airgap customers.

  Ex:-
    longhorn-controller:
      repository: rancher/hardened-sriov-cni
      tag: v2.6.3-build20230913
  

• Add a 👍 (thumbs up) reaction to this comment once done. CI won't pass without this reaction to the github-action bot's latest validation comment.
• Approve the PR to run the CI check.

[apoorvajagtap]

Hello @alexandreLamarre per the review on #5064 I have incorporated the rancher version bumps too in the same commit.
Would it be feasible to eliminate this rancher version bump changes from here, and continue with merging of #5064?
cc @jbiers @mallardduck