Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use thread_index_type in binary-ops jit kernel.cu #17420

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: branch-25.02
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

davidwendt
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Follow on to #17354 to prevent overflow in jit kernel binary-ops.
This uses the thread_index_type directly since the detail/utilities/cuda.cuh cannot be included in the jit'd kernel source.

Checklist

  • I am familiar with the Contributing Guidelines.
  • New or existing tests cover these changes.
  • The documentation is up to date with these changes.

@davidwendt davidwendt added 2 - In Progress Currently a work in progress libcudf Affects libcudf (C++/CUDA) code. improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Nov 22, 2024
@davidwendt davidwendt self-assigned this Nov 22, 2024
@davidwendt davidwendt added 3 - Ready for Review Ready for review by team and removed 2 - In Progress Currently a work in progress labels Nov 22, 2024
@davidwendt davidwendt marked this pull request as ready for review November 22, 2024 21:23
@davidwendt davidwendt requested a review from a team as a code owner November 22, 2024 21:23
Copy link
Member

@PointKernel PointKernel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great. And thanks for the quick iterations!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3 - Ready for Review Ready for review by team improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function libcudf Affects libcudf (C++/CUDA) code. non-breaking Non-breaking change
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants