Drop 112 and 117 error checks since 1186 fixed them.

python/cuspatial/cuspatial/core/binpreds/feature_contains.py

@@ -131,7 +131,6 @@ def _compute_polygon_linestring_contains(
         final_result = contains + point_intersects_count == (
             rhs_sizes_less_line_intersection_size
         )
-
         return final_result
 
     def _compute_predicate(self, lhs, rhs, preprocessor_result):

python/cuspatial/cuspatial/tests/binpreds/test_binpred_multigeometry_test_dispatch.py

@@ -17,7 +17,6 @@
 import cudf
 
 import cuspatial
-from cuspatial.utils.column_utils import contains_only_linestrings
 
 
 def sample_single_geometries(geometries):
@@ -98,15 +97,6 @@ def run_test(pred, lhs, rhs, gpdlhs, gpdrhs):
 
     # Special case for error in GEOS MultiLineString contains
     # https://github.com/libgeos/geos/issues/933
-    if (
-        pred != "intersects"
-        and contains_only_linestrings(lhs)
-        and contains_only_linestrings(rhs)
-        and (lhs.sizes > 2).any()
-        and (rhs.sizes > 2).any()
-    ):
-        # 112 and 117 are wrong
-        got[[112, 117]] = False
     assert (got.values_host == expected.values).all()
 
     # Forward
@@ -177,7 +167,17 @@ def test_linestring_multilinestring(predicate):  # noqa: F811
     lines_rhs = sample_multiples_right(
         features, linestring_linestring_dispatch_list
     )
+
+    # Create multilinestrings from sample_multiples_right output
     size = len(linestring_linestring_dispatch_list)
+
+    # Necessary to produce safe MultiLineStrings via affine_transform
+    gpdlines_rhs = lines_rhs.to_geopandas()
+    gpdlines_rhs[size::2] = gpdlines_rhs[size::2].apply(
+        lambda geom: affine_transform(geom, [1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1])
+    )
+    lines_rhs = cuspatial.from_geopandas(gpdlines_rhs)
+
     top_sizes = cp.concatenate(
         [cp.array([0]), lines_rhs[:size].sizes.cumsum()]
     )