Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introduce method_intercept_init(), method_intercept_enable() function #7

Merged
merged 43 commits into from
Nov 5, 2024

Conversation

koriym
Copy link
Member

@koriym koriym commented Nov 5, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Enhanced testing capabilities for the Ray.Aop PHP extension, including support for final methods and classes.
    • Added functionality for enabling/disabling method interception.
    • New tests introduced to validate memory management, thread safety, and the execution order of interceptors.
    • Introduced a configuration option to suppress experimental notices.
  • Documentation

    • Updated README.md to clarify extension features, installation instructions, and design decisions.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling and memory management in the extension.
  • Chores

    • Updated .gitignore to exclude unnecessary files.
    • Workflow enhancements for building and testing the PHP extension.

koriym added 5 commits July 11, 2024 21:54
A new function, method_intercept_init, has been added to the Ray AOP PHP extension. This function is designed to reset the intercept hash table, ensuring it starts empty. This change should help improve the handling of method interception by allowing a more controlled initialization of the intercept hash table.
A new test file has been added for the method_intercept_init function. This test verifies that the function correctly initializes the intercept table, intercepts the method, and stops intercepting once the table is re-initialized. It ensures the functionality of the RayAOP extension.
The commit enables the RAYAOP_DEBUG for more thorough debugging. Additionally, it adds substantial debug print statements in the php_rayaop_execute_ex function. These statements log detailed information about the execution data and method calls, which will be invaluable in identifying issues and troubleshooting errors.
The execution depth tracking was implemented in the rayaop module. A new variable 'execution_depth' was introduced, incrementing and decrementing during the execution. This allows tracking the depth of the execution and logging it for better understanding and debugging code paths.
A new PHP function 'enable_method_intercept' has been added to provide the ability to enable or disable method interception at runtime. Turned off the interception by default. The argument information for this new function has been added and the function is properly registered.
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 5, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces several modifications to the Ray.Aop PHP extension, enhancing its build and testing processes. Key changes include updates to the workflow configuration for building and testing, improvements to the .gitignore file, and significant revisions to the README.md for clarity. The config.m4, php_rayaop.h, and rayaop.c files have been modified to add new configuration options, constants, and functions. Additionally, multiple test files have been created or updated to validate new functionalities, including method interception and memory management.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/build.yml Modified workflow to create php.ini, updated test command, upgraded actions/upload-artifact to v4, enhanced Valgrind checks.
.gitignore Added modules/rayaop.so and corrected entry for cmake-build-debug.
README.md Updated description, features, requirements, installation instructions, and added new sections.
config.m4 Removed PECL macro, added PHP_ARG_ENABLE(rayaop-quiet) option, adjusted conditional checks.
php_rayaop.h Simplified header guard, added constants and error codes, modified structures for clarity.
rayaop.c Expanded error handling, refactored interception logic, added new functions for memory management.
tests/000-rayaop-loaded.phpt Added checks for method_intercept_init and method_intercept_enable functions.
tests/001-rayaop-basic.phpt Added --SKIPIF-- section, modified TestInterceptor class, updated method calls and expectations.
tests/003-rayaop-multiple-interceptors.phpt Enabled method interception, added multiple interceptor registrations.
tests/004-rayaop_method_intercept_init.phpt New test for method_intercept_init function, verifying interceptor registration.
tests/006-rayaop-interceptor-order.phpt New test for verifying LIFO execution order of interceptors.
tests/007-rayaop-memory-management.phpt New test for memory management under heavy load of interceptors.
tests/008-rayaop-thread-safety.phpt New test for evaluating thread safety of the extension.
tests/009-rayaop-final.phpt New test for interception of final classes and methods.

Possibly related PRs

  • All work towards first release #2: The changes in the main PR regarding enhancements to the Valgrind memory check and the testing process are directly related to the updates made in the retrieved PR, which also focuses on enabling memory inspection with Valgrind in CI and enhancing memory handling.

Poem

🐇 In the burrow where code does hop,
Changes made, we won't stop!
With tests and checks, our paths align,
Interceptors dance, oh how they shine!
Memory managed, errors caught,
Ray.Aop's magic, a joyful thought! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 18

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (27)
tests/000-rayaop-loaded.phpt (1)

7-8: Consider enhancing test coverage.

While the basic existence checks are good, consider adding more comprehensive tests in separate test files to validate:

  1. The initialization behavior of method_intercept_init
  2. The enabling/disabling functionality of method_intercept_enable
  3. Error handling scenarios

Would you like me to help create additional test cases for these scenarios?

Also applies to: 16-17

config.m4 (1)

19-25: LGTM! Consider documenting the quiet mode in README

The quiet mode configuration is well-implemented following PHP extension best practices. The option is properly integrated with clear defaults and conditional handling.

Consider adding documentation in the README about this new configuration option to help users understand:

  • The purpose of quiet mode
  • When to use it
  • The default behavior
tests/009-rayaop-final.phpt (1)

10-14: Consider expanding test coverage for final methods.

While the current test case is valid, consider enhancing it to cover more scenarios:

  • Multiple final methods
  • Mix of final and non-final methods
  • Different method visibilities (private, protected)

Example enhancement:

 final class FinalTestClass {
     final public function finalMethod($arg) {
         return "Final method: $arg";
     }
+    final private function finalPrivateMethod($arg) {
+        return "Final private method: $arg";
+    }
+    public function nonFinalMethod($arg) {
+        return "Non-final method: $arg";
+    }
 }
tests/003-rayaop-multiple-interceptors.phpt (3)

Line range hint 12-20: Consider enhancing interceptor implementations with error handling

While the interceptor implementations are functional, they could be more robust:

  1. Add error handling for call_user_func failures
  2. Consider using more specific return type hints
 class Interceptor1 implements Ray\Aop\MethodInterceptorInterface {
-    public function intercept(object $object, string $method, array $params): mixed {
-        return "Interceptor1: " . call_user_func([$object, $method], ...$params);
+    public function intercept(object $object, string $method, array $params): string {
+        $result = call_user_func([$object, $method], ...$params);
+        if ($result === false) {
+            throw new RuntimeException('Method invocation failed');
+        }
+        return "Interceptor1: " . $result;
     }
 }

30-30: Add a comment explaining the enable_method_intercept call

The enable_method_intercept call is crucial for the test flow. Consider adding a comment explaining its purpose and why it needs to be called after interceptor registration.

+// Enable method interception after all interceptors are registered
 enable_method_intercept(true);

Line range hint 32-34: Consider adding more test cases

The current test validates the basic functionality, but consider adding:

  1. Test case for disable_method_intercept
  2. Explicit verification of interceptor execution order
  3. Edge cases (e.g., null parameters, error conditions)

Example additional test:

// Test disabling interception
enable_method_intercept(false);
$result = $test->testMethod("Hello");
var_dump($result); // Should show original output without interceptors
tests/007-rayaop-memory-management.phpt (2)

1-7: Enhance test documentation with specific memory thresholds.

The test description could be more specific about what constitutes "acceptable limits" for memory usage. Consider adding comments that define the expected memory thresholds or maximum allowed memory increase.

 --TEST--
 RayAOP memory and resource management test
 --FILE--
 <?php
 // Test memory management and resource cleanup
 // This test verifies that the extension properly manages memory
-// when dealing with large numbers of interceptors
+// when dealing with large numbers of interceptors
+// Acceptable memory limits: Memory increase should not exceed 10MB
+// after registering 1000 interceptors

8-10: Improve memory measurement accuracy.

Consider enhancing the memory measurements by:

  1. Adding peak memory usage tracking
  2. Running garbage collection before measurements
 function testMemoryManagement() {
+    gc_collect_cycles();
     $startMemory = memory_get_usage();
+    $startPeakMemory = memory_get_peak_usage();
tests/006-rayaop-interceptor-order.phpt (3)

1-6: Enhance test documentation with specific expectations.

While the test purpose is clear, consider adding more detailed documentation about:

  • The expected LIFO behavior
  • The number of interceptors being tested
  • The expected execution flow
 --TEST--
 RayAOP interceptor execution order verification
 --FILE--
 <?php
-// Test to verify the execution order of multiple interceptors
-// This test ensures that interceptors are executed in the correct order (LIFO)
+// Test to verify the execution order of multiple interceptors in LIFO (Last In, First Out) order
+// Expected execution flow:
+// 1. Second interceptor (order=2) starts
+// 2. Original method executes
+// 3. Second interceptor ends
+// This verifies that the last registered interceptor wraps the previous ones

20-24: Add return type declaration to TestClass method.

For better type safety and documentation:

 class TestClass {
-    public function method() {
+    public function method(): void {
         echo "Original method\n";
     }
 }

33-36: Enhance test coverage with additional output scenarios.

The expected output should cover error scenarios and include clear separation between outputs.

 --EXPECT--
 Interceptor 2 start
 Original method
-Interceptor 2 end
+Interceptor 2 end
+
+--XFAIL--
+Failed to register interceptors
+
+--EXPECTF--
+Interceptor 2 start
+Interceptor 2 error
+Fatal error: Uncaught %s
tests/001-rayaop-basic.phpt (1)

13-19: Consider adding method documentation.

The TestInterceptor implementation is correct and follows modern PHP practices with proper type hints. Consider adding a PHPDoc block to document the method's purpose and parameters.

 class TestInterceptor implements \Ray\Aop\MethodInterceptorInterface
 {
+    /**
+     * @param object $object Target object
+     * @param string $method Method being intercepted
+     * @param array $params Method parameters
+     * @return mixed
+     */
     public function intercept(object $object, string $method, array $params): mixed
tests/004-rayaop_method_intercept_init.phpt (3)

4-14: Remove duplicate extension check.

The extension load check is duplicated in both SKIPIF and FILE sections. The SKIPIF section is sufficient for this check.

 --SKIPIF--
 <?php
 if (!extension_loaded("rayaop")) {
     die("skip RayAOP extension is not loaded.");
 }
 ?>
 --FILE--
 <?php
-// Ensure the RayAOP extension is loaded
-if (!extension_loaded("rayaop")) {
-    die("RayAOP extension is not loaded.");
-}

20-24: Consider using a named class for the interceptor.

Using an anonymous class for the interceptor makes the test harder to debug and understand. Consider creating a named class that clearly describes its purpose.

-    $interceptor = new class {
-        public function intercept($object, $method, $params) {
-            echo "Intercepted: " . get_class($object) . "::" . $method . "\n";
-        }
-    };
+    class TestMethodInterceptor {
+        public function intercept($object, $method, $params) {
+            echo "Intercepted: " . get_class($object) . "::" . $method . "\n";
+        }
+    }
+    $interceptor = new TestMethodInterceptor();

51-52: Add test cleanup and isolation.

The test should clean up after execution to prevent interference with other tests.

 // Run the test
 test_intercept_init();
+
+// Clean up after test
+method_intercept_init();
tests/008-rayaop-thread-safety.phpt (1)

28-33: Consider expanding test coverage.

The test class could be enhanced to:

  1. Accept parameters to test parameter passing through interceptors
  2. Return different values to test various execution paths
  3. Include multiple methods to test method-specific interception
.github/workflows/build.yml (1)

43-43: Consider adding error logging configuration.

While setting PHP_INI_SCAN_DIR is correct, consider enhancing the test environment with additional error reporting settings.

-        run: PHP_INI_SCAN_DIR=$(pwd) make test
+        run: PHP_INI_SCAN_DIR=$(pwd) PHP_ERROR_LOG=$(pwd)/php_errors.log make test TESTS="-d error_reporting=E_ALL -d display_errors=1 -d log_errors=1 -d error_log=$(pwd)/php_errors.log"
README.md (4)

19-45: Consider adding troubleshooting information.

While the installation instructions are clear, consider adding a troubleshooting section to help users resolve common installation issues, such as:

  • Missing build dependencies
  • Common compilation errors
  • Platform-specific considerations

48-70: Fix hyphenation in feature list.

The content effectively explains the design decisions and relationship with Ray.Aop.

Consider updating line 63 to use proper hyphenation:

-Attribute/Annotation based interception
+Attribute/Annotation-based interception
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~63-~63: This expression is usually spelled with a hyphen.
Context: ...ple interceptors per method - Attribute/Annotation based interception - Sophisticated AOP featur...

(BASED_HYPHEN)


[uncategorized] ~69-~69: Possible missing preposition found.
Context: ... the low-level interception mechanism - Ray.Aop automatically utilizes this extensi...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_TO)


71-102: Enhance code examples with detailed comments.

While the examples are clear, consider adding more detailed comments to explain:

  • The purpose of each step in the interception process
  • What happens internally when the interceptor is called
  • Expected output of the examples

Example enhancement for the final method example:

 // Register the interceptor
+// This enables interception of the finalMethod, even though it's declared as final
 method_intercept(FinalClass::class, 'finalMethod', new LoggingInterceptor());
+
+// Creating an instance - the extension handles the interception transparently
 $instance = new FinalClass();
+
+// When called, this will output:
+// Before finalMethod
+// After finalMethod
+// Final: test
 echo $instance->finalMethod('test'); // Interceptor will be invoked

126-134: Consider adding coding standards information.

The contribution guidelines are clear, but consider adding:

  • Coding style guidelines
  • Commit message format requirements
  • PR review process expectations
php_rayaop.h (2)

127-127: Use zend_string* instead of char* for key generation

Using zend_string* aligns with PHP's internal string handling and improves memory management.

Apply this diff to update the function signature:

-PHP_RAYAOP_API char *php_rayaop_generate_key(zend_string *class_name, zend_string *method_name, size_t *key_len);
+PHP_RAYAOP_API zend_string *php_rayaop_generate_key(zend_string *class_name, zend_string *method_name);

Update the implementation to return a zend_string*:

PHP_RAYAOP_API zend_string *php_rayaop_generate_key(zend_string *class_name, zend_string *method_name) {
    return strpprintf(0, "%s::%s", ZSTR_VAL(class_name), ZSTR_VAL(method_name));
}

73-74: Remove redundant macro definition for phpext_rayaop_ptr

Defining phpext_rayaop_ptr as a macro is unnecessary and could lead to confusion. Use an external declaration instead.

Apply this diff to clean up the code:

-#define phpext_rayaop_ptr &rayaop_module_entry
+extern zend_module_entry *phpext_rayaop_ptr;
rayaop.c (4)

47-64: Simplify Error Handling in php_rayaop_handle_error

The error handling function contains repetitive code in each case of the switch statement. Consider simplifying it to enhance readability and maintainability.

Apply this diff to refactor the error handling:

PHP_RAYAOP_API void php_rayaop_handle_error(int error_code, const char *message) {
+    int error_type = E_ERROR;
+    const char *error_prefix;

     switch (error_code) {
         case RAYAOP_E_MEMORY_ALLOCATION:
-            php_error_docref(NULL, E_ERROR, "Memory allocation failed: %s", message);
-            break;
+            error_prefix = "Memory allocation failed";
+            break;
         case RAYAOP_E_HASH_UPDATE:
-            php_error_docref(NULL, E_ERROR, "Hash table update failed: %s", message);
-            break;
+            error_prefix = "Hash table update failed";
+            break;
         case RAYAOP_E_INVALID_HANDLER:
-            php_error_docref(NULL, E_WARNING, "Invalid handler: %s", message);
-            break;
+            error_type = E_WARNING;
+            error_prefix = "Invalid handler";
+            break;
         case RAYAOP_E_MAX_DEPTH_EXCEEDED:
-            php_error_docref(NULL, E_WARNING, "Maximum execution depth exceeded: %s", message);
-            break;
+            error_type = E_WARNING;
+            error_prefix = "Maximum execution depth exceeded";
+            break;
         default:
-            php_error_docref(NULL, E_ERROR, "RayAOP Error (%d): %s", error_code, message);
-    }
+            error_prefix = "Unknown error";
+            break;
+    }
+
+    php_error_docref(NULL, error_type, "%s: %s", error_prefix, message);
 }

95-102: Optimize Condition Order in php_rayaop_should_intercept

Rearrange conditions to first check inexpensive evaluations, improving performance when method interception is disabled.

Apply this diff to optimize condition checks:

PHP_RAYAOP_API bool php_rayaop_should_intercept(zend_execute_data *execute_data) {
-    if (!RAYAOP_G(method_intercept_enabled)) {
+    if (!RAYAOP_G(method_intercept_enabled) || RAYAOP_G(is_intercepting)) {
         return false;
     }

-    if (RAYAOP_G(execution_depth) >= MAX_EXECUTION_DEPTH) {
-        php_rayaop_handle_error(RAYAOP_E_MAX_DEPTH_EXCEEDED, "Maximum execution depth reached");
-        return false;
-    }

-    return execute_data &&
-           execute_data->func &&
-           execute_data->func->common.scope &&
-           execute_data->func->common.function_name &&
-           !RAYAOP_G(is_intercepting);
+    if (!execute_data || !execute_data->func) {
+        return false;
+    }

+    if (RAYAOP_G(execution_depth) >= MAX_EXECUTION_DEPTH) {
+        php_rayaop_handle_error(RAYAOP_E_MAX_DEPTH_EXCEEDED, "Maximum execution depth reached");
+        return false;
+    }

+    return execute_data->func->common.scope && execute_data->func->common.function_name;
 }

280-281: Check Return Value of zend_hash_init

After calling zend_hash_init, verify its return value to handle any potential initialization failures.

Add an error check as follows:

zend_hash_init(RAYAOP_G(intercept_ht), 8, NULL, (dtor_func_t)php_rayaop_free_intercept_info, 0);
+if (!RAYAOP_G(intercept_ht)) {
+    RAYAOP_G_UNLOCK();
+    php_rayaop_handle_error(RAYAOP_E_MEMORY_ALLOCATION, "Failed to initialize intercept hash table");
+    RETURN_FALSE;
+}

391-425: Extend Debug Functionality in php_rayaop_debug_print_zval

The php_rayaop_debug_print_zval function currently handles basic types. Consider extending support for additional types like resources or references for comprehensive debugging.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 98d3b5e and e9d5a64.

📒 Files selected for processing (14)
  • .github/workflows/build.yml (2 hunks)
  • .gitignore (1 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • config.m4 (1 hunks)
  • php_rayaop.h (1 hunks)
  • rayaop.c (1 hunks)
  • tests/000-rayaop-loaded.phpt (1 hunks)
  • tests/001-rayaop-basic.phpt (1 hunks)
  • tests/003-rayaop-multiple-interceptors.phpt (1 hunks)
  • tests/004-rayaop_method_intercept_init.phpt (1 hunks)
  • tests/006-rayaop-interceptor-order.phpt (1 hunks)
  • tests/007-rayaop-memory-management.phpt (1 hunks)
  • tests/008-rayaop-thread-safety.phpt (1 hunks)
  • tests/009-rayaop-final.phpt (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .gitignore
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md

[uncategorized] ~63-~63: This expression is usually spelled with a hyphen.
Context: ...ple interceptors per method - Attribute/Annotation based interception - Sophisticated AOP featur...

(BASED_HYPHEN)


[uncategorized] ~69-~69: Possible missing preposition found.
Context: ... the low-level interception mechanism - Ray.Aop automatically utilizes this extensi...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_TO)

🪛 cppcheck
rayaop.c

[error] 40-40: There is an unknown macro here somewhere. Configuration is required. If ZEND_BEGIN_ARG_INFO_EX is a macro then please configure it.

(unknownMacro)

🔇 Additional comments (18)
config.m4 (1)

3-4: Verify duplicate PHP_ARG_ENABLE declarations

The AI summary indicates that the rayaop enable option is listed twice, but we only see one instance here. Let's verify this.

tests/009-rayaop-final.phpt (1)

1-6: LGTM! Test setup follows PHPT best practices.

The test configuration is well-structured with appropriate extension availability check.

tests/003-rayaop-multiple-interceptors.phpt (1)

Line range hint 1-7: Test structure follows best practices

The PHPT test file is well-structured with proper sections (TEST, SKIPIF, FILE, EXPECT) and clear validation of the extension's availability.

tests/007-rayaop-memory-management.phpt (2)

30-32: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Update expected output to match new format.

The expected output section needs to be updated to match the new memory usage reporting format.

 --EXPECT--
-Memory usage is within acceptable limits
+Memory usage increase: 123456 bytes
 Memory test completed

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


1-32: Verify thread safety of memory management test.

Since this test deals with resource management, it would be beneficial to verify its behavior in a multi-threaded environment.

Consider adding parallel execution tests or documenting thread safety assumptions in the test comments.

✅ Verification successful

Thread safety is properly implemented in the memory management test

The extension's implementation shows comprehensive thread safety support:

  1. The code includes proper ZTS (Zend Thread Safety) handling:

    • Includes TSRM headers when ZTS is enabled
    • Uses thread-safe globals access via TSRMG macros
    • Implements mutex locks (RAYAOP_G_LOCK/UNLOCK) for critical sections
  2. The memory management test is safe to run in a multi-threaded environment because:

    • Global state access is protected by mutex locks
    • Resource cleanup is handled properly in thread-safe manner
    • Memory allocations and deallocations are synchronized

The original review comment's concern about thread safety verification is addressed by the existing implementation.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any thread safety related tests or annotations
rg -l "ZTS|THREAD" tests/

Length of output: 27


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the broader context by:
# 1. Looking for any thread-related code in the entire codebase
# 2. Checking if this is a PHP extension by looking for config/build files
# 3. Looking for ZTS/thread safety mentions in documentation

# Check for thread-related code in all files
rg -i "thread|zts|concurrent|parallel" --type-not binary

# Look for typical PHP extension files
fd -e "m4|w32" -e "h" -e "c"

# Check README or documentation files
fd -e md -e rst -e txt | xargs cat

Length of output: 12077


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the extension source files for thread safety implementation
# 1. Check header file for ZTS/TSRM related definitions
cat php_rayaop.h

# 2. Check implementation file for thread safety handling
cat rayaop.c

# 3. Look specifically for TSRM macros and thread-local storage
rg "TSRM|TSRMLS|ZEND_TSRMLS" php_rayaop.h rayaop.c

Length of output: 19586

tests/001-rayaop-basic.phpt (5)

3-8: LGTM: Proper extension availability check.

The SKIPIF section correctly ensures the test is skipped if the rayaop extension is not loaded, following PHPUnit best practices.


21-27: LGTM: Clean test class implementation.

The TestClass provides a good test case with an optional parameter, allowing for flexible testing scenarios.


42-47: LGTM: Expected output matches test operations.

The expected output properly validates all test cases including:

  • Successful initialization and registration (bool(true))
  • Intercepted method call
  • Non-intercepted method call after disabling interception

1-47: Verify complete test coverage of new functions.

Let's ensure all new functions have dedicated test cases.

#!/bin/bash
# Check test coverage for new functions
echo "Checking for dedicated test cases..."
rg -l "method_intercept_init|method_intercept_enable" tests/

29-40: Consider adding cleanup and additional verification.

While the test covers the basic functionality well, consider:

  1. Adding explicit cleanup after the test (e.g., resetting the intercept table)
  2. Verifying that the interceptor is properly removed when disabled
tests/008-rayaop-thread-safety.phpt (2)

20-25: Verify PHP version compatibility requirements.

The mixed return type hint was introduced in PHP 8.0. If this extension needs to support earlier PHP versions, this could cause compatibility issues.


38-46: ⚠️ Potential issue

Verify interceptor chaining behavior.

The expected output shows only interceptor #2 executing, but all three interceptors are registered. This suggests that either:

  1. The interceptors aren't properly chaining, or
  2. Later registrations are overwriting earlier ones

This needs investigation as it might indicate a bug in the interceptor registration system.

.github/workflows/build.yml (1)

37-40: LGTM: Clean approach to extension configuration.

The creation of a dedicated php.ini file with the absolute path to the extension is a robust approach. This ensures consistent extension loading across different environments.

README.md (1)

7-14: LGTM! Clear and informative introduction.

The introduction and features section effectively communicates the extension's purpose and capabilities while maintaining a clear relationship with Ray.Aop.

php_rayaop.h (1)

125-125: Verify proper error handling in php_rayaop_handle_error

Ensure that the php_rayaop_handle_error function correctly triggers PHP errors or exceptions according to the error code provided.

Run the following script to check the implementation of php_rayaop_handle_error:

✅ Verification successful

Error handling implementation is properly structured and comprehensive

The php_rayaop_handle_error function correctly handles all defined error codes with appropriate error reporting:

  • Memory allocation errors (RAYAOP_E_MEMORY_ALLOCATION) trigger E_ERROR with allocation failure messages
  • Hash table update failures (RAYAOP_E_HASH_UPDATE) are properly reported
  • Invalid handler cases (RAYAOP_E_INVALID_HANDLER) cover both NULL instances and execution failures
  • Maximum depth exceeded errors (RAYAOP_E_MAX_DEPTH_EXCEEDED) are handled to prevent infinite recursion

The implementation uses PHP's native error reporting system via php_error_docref() and includes descriptive error messages for each case.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that php_rayaop_handle_error properly handles different error codes.

# Test: Search for usages of php_rayaop_handle_error and ensure appropriate error reporting.
rg -A 3 'php_rayaop_handle_error' src/

Length of output: 83


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's search in the root directory since the file structure might be different
rg -A 3 'php_rayaop_handle_error'

Length of output: 2432


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the error code definitions to understand all possible error cases
rg "define.*RAYAOP_E_" -A 1

Length of output: 242

rayaop.c (3)

40-40: Static Analysis Warning: Unknown Macro

The static analysis tool reported an unknown macro ZEND_BEGIN_ARG_INFO_EX. Ensure that the build configuration includes the necessary paths and definitions for PHP macros.

Check the build configuration and include paths to resolve the macro definition issue.

🧰 Tools
🪛 cppcheck

[error] 40-40: There is an unknown macro here somewhere. Configuration is required. If ZEND_BEGIN_ARG_INFO_EX is a macro then please configure it.

(unknownMacro)


142-148: ⚠️ Potential issue

Ensure Proper Reference Counting in Parameter Preparation

In the loop adding arguments to params[2], the reference counting might be incorrect, potentially leading to memory issues.

Consider adjusting the reference counting as follows:

for (uint32_t i = 0; i < arg_count; i++) {
    zval *arg = &args[i];
    if (!Z_ISUNDEF_P(arg)) {
-       Z_TRY_ADDREF_P(arg);
        add_next_index_zval(&params[2], arg);
+       Z_TRY_ADDREF_P(arg);
    }
}

This ensures that add_next_index_zval manages the reference counting appropriately.

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


308-309: Verify Thread Safety in Module Initialization

In ZTS (Zend Thread Safety) mode, ensure that global initialization is correctly handled to prevent race conditions.

Run the following script to check for potential issues:

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more context about the thread safety implementation.


Thread Safety Implementation is Properly Handled

The thread safety implementation in the module is correctly handled with proper synchronization mechanisms:

  1. Global variables are properly initialized using ts_allocate_id() with initialization callback
  2. All global access is protected by mutex locks using RAYAOP_G_LOCK() and RAYAOP_G_UNLOCK()
  3. The code handles both ZTS and non-ZTS modes through proper macro definitions
  4. Critical sections (hash table operations, state changes) are consistently protected
  5. Memory management and cleanup are properly synchronized
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that globals are properly initialized in ZTS mode.

# Expected: No unprotected access to globals without proper synchronization mechanisms.

rg --files-with-matches 'rayaop_globals' | xargs grep -n 'rayaop_globals' | grep -v 'TSRMLS_CACHE_UPDATE' | grep -v 'php_rayaop_init_globals'

Length of output: 516


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the initialization and usage patterns of globals
rg -A 5 -B 5 "RAYAOP_G\(" 

# Check mutex usage patterns
rg -A 3 -B 3 "RAYAOP_G_LOCK|RAYAOP_G_UNLOCK"

# Check the global initialization function
rg -A 10 "php_rayaop_init_globals"

Length of output: 14869

tests/000-rayaop-loaded.phpt Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/009-rayaop-final.phpt Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/009-rayaop-final.phpt Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/007-rayaop-memory-management.phpt Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/007-rayaop-memory-management.phpt Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/008-rayaop-thread-safety.phpt Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/build.yml Show resolved Hide resolved
php_rayaop.h Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
php_rayaop.h Show resolved Hide resolved
php_rayaop.h Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
tests/003-rayaop-multiple-interceptors.phpt (2)

Line range hint 8-21: Consider expanding test coverage for edge cases.

While the basic interceptor chain is tested, consider adding test cases for:

  • Error conditions (e.g., invalid parameters)
  • Interceptor chain order verification
  • Memory management with multiple interceptors

Line range hint 32-34: Enhance test assertions for better coverage.

The current test only verifies the final output. Consider adding:

  1. Intermediate assertions to verify each interceptor's execution
  2. Multiple test cases with different parameters
  3. Verification of interceptor execution order

Example enhancement:

// Test multiple scenarios
$test = new TestClass();

// Test case 1: Basic string
$result1 = $test->testMethod("Hello");
var_dump($result1);

// Test case 2: Empty string
$result2 = $test->testMethod("");
var_dump($result2);

// Test case 3: Special characters
$result3 = $test->testMethod("!@#$%");
var_dump($result3);
php_rayaop.h (3)

5-6: Consider using a more robust debug configuration mechanism.

Instead of commenting/uncommenting the debug flag, consider using a build-time configuration option or runtime configuration through PHP INI settings.

-// #define RAYAOP_DEBUG 1
+#ifndef NDEBUG
+#define RAYAOP_DEBUG 1
+#endif

31-31: Document the purpose and implications of MAX_EXECUTION_DEPTH.

Add a comment explaining why this limit exists and what happens when it's exceeded.

+/* Maximum depth of nested method interceptions to prevent infinite recursion */
 #define MAX_EXECUTION_DEPTH 100

57-60: Enhance debug output with function name and severity level.

Consider adding function name and severity level to debug output for better debugging experience.

 #define PHP_RAYAOP_DEBUG_PRINT(fmt, ...) \
     do { \
-        php_printf("RAYAOP DEBUG [%s:%d]: " fmt "\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
+        php_printf("RAYAOP DEBUG [%s:%d:%s] %s: " fmt "\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, __FUNCTION__, "INFO", ##__VA_ARGS__); \
     } while (0)
rayaop.c (3)

37-43: Consider initializing globals atomically

The globals initialization should be done atomically to prevent potential race conditions in a multi-threaded environment.

Consider wrapping the initialization in a critical section:

static void php_rayaop_init_globals(zend_rayaop_globals *globals) {
+   RAYAOP_G_LOCK();
    globals->intercept_ht = NULL;
    globals->is_intercepting = 0;
    globals->execution_depth = 0;
    globals->method_intercept_enabled = 0;
    globals->debug_level = 0;
+   RAYAOP_G_UNLOCK();
}
🧰 Tools
🪛 cppcheck

[error] 42-42: There is an unknown macro here somewhere. Configuration is required. If ZEND_BEGIN_ARG_INFO_EX is a macro then please configure it.

(unknownMacro)


47-64: Standardize error reporting levels

The error handling uses different error levels (E_ERROR, E_WARNING) inconsistently. Consider standardizing based on error severity.

  • Memory allocation and hash table errors should remain E_ERROR
  • Invalid handler and max depth errors could be E_WARNING
  • Consider adding E_NOTICE for less critical issues

363-372: Ensure complete cleanup in request shutdown

The request shutdown function should ensure all resources are properly cleaned up, including resetting the execution flags.

Add complete cleanup:

PHP_RSHUTDOWN_FUNCTION(rayaop) {
    RAYAOP_G_LOCK();
    if (RAYAOP_G(intercept_ht)) {
        zend_hash_destroy(RAYAOP_G(intercept_ht));
        FREE_HASHTABLE(RAYAOP_G(intercept_ht));
        RAYAOP_G(intercept_ht) = NULL;
    }
+   RAYAOP_G(is_intercepting) = 0;
+   RAYAOP_G(execution_depth) = 0;
+   RAYAOP_G(method_intercept_enabled) = 0;
    RAYAOP_G_UNLOCK();
    return SUCCESS;
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e9d5a64 and 20a3779.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • .github/workflows/build.yml (3 hunks)
  • php_rayaop.h (1 hunks)
  • rayaop.c (1 hunks)
  • tests/000-rayaop-loaded.phpt (1 hunks)
  • tests/001-rayaop-basic.phpt (1 hunks)
  • tests/003-rayaop-multiple-interceptors.phpt (1 hunks)
  • tests/009-rayaop-final.phpt (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
  • .github/workflows/build.yml
  • tests/000-rayaop-loaded.phpt
  • tests/001-rayaop-basic.phpt
  • tests/009-rayaop-final.phpt
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 cppcheck
rayaop.c

[error] 42-42: There is an unknown macro here somewhere. Configuration is required. If ZEND_BEGIN_ARG_INFO_EX is a macro then please configure it.

(unknownMacro)

🔇 Additional comments (7)
tests/003-rayaop-multiple-interceptors.phpt (1)

29-30: Verify interceptor registration and document enable behavior.

The test should verify:

  1. Successful registration of interceptors
  2. State persistence of method_intercept_enable()
  3. Order of operations between registration and enable

Consider adding error handling:

-method_intercept(TestClass::class, 'testMethod', new Interceptor1());
-method_intercept(TestClass::class, 'testMethod', new Interceptor2());
+$success1 = method_intercept(TestClass::class, 'testMethod', new Interceptor1());
+$success2 = method_intercept(TestClass::class, 'testMethod', new Interceptor2());
+if (!$success1 || !$success2) {
+    die('Failed to register interceptors');
+}
php_rayaop.h (5)

51-53: Use IS_BOOL instead of _IS_BOOL for boolean type hints.

The issue with using deprecated _IS_BOOL type was previously reported and still needs to be addressed.


66-72: Correct the usage of thread safety macros.

The issue with incorrect mutex usage was previously reported and still needs to be addressed.


90-96: Initialize all fields in php_rayaop_intercept_info structure.

The issue with structure initialization was previously reported and still needs to be addressed.


127-127: Verify consistent error handling across the extension.

Ensure that php_rayaop_handle_error is consistently used throughout the extension for error reporting.

#!/bin/bash
# Search for error handling function usage
rg "php_rayaop_handle_error\("

98-105: Verify initialization of new global fields.

Ensure that execution_depth, method_intercept_enabled, and debug_level are properly initialized in MINIT/RINIT.

✅ Verification successful

Let me try another search pattern to find the initialization functions.


Let me search for the initialization function that's referenced in MINIT.


All global fields are properly initialized

The verification shows that all new global fields are correctly initialized:

  • In php_rayaop_init_globals: execution_depth = 0, method_intercept_enabled = 0, debug_level = 0
  • Additionally in MINIT: method_intercept_enabled = 1, debug_level = 0 (overriding the initial values)
  • execution_depth remains at 0 which is appropriate for request start
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for initialization of new global fields
rg -A 5 "PHP_(M|R)INIT_FUNCTION\(rayaop\)"

Length of output: 1167


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for MINIT and RINIT functions in rayaop.c
rg -A 10 "^PHP_(MINIT|RINIT)_FUNCTION" rayaop.c

Length of output: 881


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the globals initialization function
rg -A 10 "php_rayaop_init_globals" rayaop.c

Length of output: 926

rayaop.c (1)

1-466: Overall implementation is robust and well-structured

The code demonstrates good practices in:

  • Error handling with specific error codes
  • Memory management with proper cleanup
  • Thread safety considerations
  • Debug functionality

Minor improvements suggested above would enhance the robustness and safety of the implementation.

🧰 Tools
🪛 cppcheck

[error] 42-42: There is an unknown macro here somewhere. Configuration is required. If ZEND_BEGIN_ARG_INFO_EX is a macro then please configure it.

(unknownMacro)

rayaop.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
rayaop.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
rayaop.c (2)

38-43: Consider removing the redundant execution_depth tracking.

Based on the previous discussion, the execution_depth variable remains at 1 due to the is_intercepting flag effectively preventing recursive interception. Consider removing this redundant tracking to simplify the code.

static void php_rayaop_init_globals(zend_rayaop_globals *globals) {
    globals->intercept_ht = NULL;
    globals->is_intercepting = 0;
-   globals->execution_depth = 0;
    globals->method_intercept_enabled = 0;
    globals->debug_level = 0;
}
🧰 Tools
🪛 cppcheck

[error] 42-42: There is an unknown macro here somewhere. Configuration is required. If ZEND_BEGIN_ARG_INFO_EX is a macro then please configure it.

(unknownMacro)


77-90: Add NULL check for zval parameter.

While the implementation is solid, consider adding a parameter validation to ensure robustness.

PHP_RAYAOP_API void php_rayaop_free_intercept_info(zval *zv) {
+   if (!zv) {
+       return;
+   }
    RAYAOP_G_LOCK();
    php_rayaop_intercept_info *info = Z_PTR_P(zv);
    if (info) {
        // ... rest of the function
    }
    RAYAOP_G_UNLOCK();
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 20a3779 and 5d59780.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • rayaop.c (1 hunks)
  • tests/009-rayaop-final.phpt (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • tests/009-rayaop-final.phpt
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
rayaop.c (1)
Learnt from: koriym
PR: ray-di/ext-rayaop#7
File: rayaop.c:250-274
Timestamp: 2024-11-05T09:05:10.936Z
Learning: In `rayaop.c`, when cleaning up `php_rayaop_intercept_info` structures upon failure, we can use `php_rayaop_free_intercept_info` by passing a temporary `zval` containing the pointer to `info`.
🪛 cppcheck
rayaop.c

[error] 42-42: There is an unknown macro here somewhere. Configuration is required. If ZEND_BEGIN_ARG_INFO_EX is a macro then please configure it.

(unknownMacro)

🔇 Additional comments (3)
rayaop.c (3)

47-64: LGTM! Well-structured error handling.

The error handling implementation is well-organized with appropriate error codes and severity levels for different scenarios.


281-296: LGTM! Well-implemented core functions.

The implementation of method_intercept_init and method_intercept_enable is solid with proper locking mechanisms and error handling.

Also applies to: 299-315


317-478: LGTM! Well-structured module lifecycle.

The module initialization, shutdown, and debug functions are well-implemented with proper error handling and cleanup.

rayaop.c Show resolved Hide resolved
rayaop.c Show resolved Hide resolved
rayaop.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
rayaop.c (6)

47-64: Consider adding more specific error codes for better error tracking.

The error handling function could benefit from additional error codes for specific scenarios, such as parameter validation failures or interceptor initialization errors.


67-75: Consider adding cleanup in error path for partial allocations.

While the memory allocation is handled correctly, consider adding cleanup code for any partial allocations that might occur before the error condition.


111-116: Add validation for empty class or method names.

Consider adding validation to ensure that neither class_name nor method_name is empty before generating the key.

 PHP_RAYAOP_API char *php_rayaop_generate_key(zend_string *class_name, zend_string *method_name, size_t *key_len) {
+    if (ZSTR_LEN(class_name) == 0 || ZSTR_LEN(method_name) == 0) {
+        return NULL;
+    }
     char *key = NULL;
     *key_len = spprintf(&key, 0, "%s::%s", ZSTR_VAL(class_name), ZSTR_VAL(method_name));
     PHP_RAYAOP_DEBUG_PRINT("Generated key: %s", key);
     return key;
 }

174-237: Enhance debug logging for better traceability.

Consider adding more detailed debug logging for interceptor execution status and error conditions.

 static void rayaop_execute_ex(zend_execute_data *execute_data) {
     if (!php_rayaop_should_intercept(execute_data)) {
+        PHP_RAYAOP_DEBUG_PRINT("Skipping interception: conditions not met");
         if (php_rayaop_original_execute_ex) {
             php_rayaop_original_execute_ex(execute_data);
         } else {

280-296: Add validation for hash table initialization state.

Consider adding a state check to prevent multiple initializations.

 PHP_FUNCTION(method_intercept_init) {
     RAYAOP_G_LOCK();
+    if (RAYAOP_G(method_intercept_enabled)) {
+        RAYAOP_G_UNLOCK();
+        php_rayaop_handle_error(RAYAOP_E_INVALID_STATE, "Cannot initialize while interception is enabled");
+        RETURN_FALSE;
+    }
     if (RAYAOP_G(intercept_ht)) {

401-458: Consider enhancing debug output formatting.

The debug output could be more readable with consistent indentation and separators.

 void php_rayaop_debug_dump_intercept_info(void) {
     RAYAOP_G_LOCK();
     if (RAYAOP_G(intercept_ht)) {
-        php_printf("=== Intercept Information Dump ===\n");
+        php_printf("\n=== Intercept Information Dump ===\n");
         php_rayaop_intercept_info *info;
         zend_string *key;
         ZEND_HASH_FOREACH_STR_KEY_PTR(RAYAOP_G(intercept_ht), key, info) {
             if (key && info) {
-                php_printf("Key: %s\n", ZSTR_VAL(key));
-                php_printf("  Class: %s\n", ZSTR_VAL(info->class_name));
+                php_printf("\nKey: %s\n", ZSTR_VAL(key));
+                php_printf("    Class: %s\n", ZSTR_VAL(info->class_name));
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5d59780 and 38d2998.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • rayaop.c (1 hunks)
  • tests/008-rayaop-thread-safety.phpt (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • tests/008-rayaop-thread-safety.phpt
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 cppcheck
rayaop.c

[error] 42-42: There is an unknown macro here somewhere. Configuration is required. If ZEND_BEGIN_ARG_INFO_EX is a macro then please configure it.

(unknownMacro)

🔇 Additional comments (4)
rayaop.c (4)

1-33: LGTM: Interface and module setup is well-structured.

The interface definition and argument information are properly declared following PHP extension development best practices.


317-384: LGTM: Module lifecycle management is robust.

The initialization, request handling, and shutdown functions are properly implemented with appropriate resource management and thread safety considerations.


462-477: LGTM: Module entry is properly configured.

The module entry point follows the standard PHP extension structure with all required handlers properly registered.


204-205: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix duplicate call to prepare_intercept_params.

The function is called twice consecutively, which could lead to memory leaks and incorrect behavior.

-           prepare_intercept_params(execute_data, params, info);
            if (!prepare_intercept_params(execute_data, params, info)) {

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
README.md (5)

40-53: Enhance installation instructions with platform-specific details.

Consider improving the php.ini configuration section:

  1. Separate the Windows and Unix/Linux configurations into distinct sections
  2. Add a note about the location of php.ini on different platforms
  3. Include common troubleshooting steps if the extension fails to load
 ; Required extension loading
-extension=rayaop.so  # For Unix/Linux
-extension=rayaop.dll # For Windows
+; For Unix/Linux systems:
+extension=rayaop.so
+
+; For Windows systems:
+; extension=rayaop.dll
+
+; Note: On Unix/Linux, php.ini is typically found in /etc/php/
+; On Windows, it's usually in C:\php\

67-72: Consider adding error handling examples in the Best Practices section.

The best practices are good but would be more actionable with concrete examples, especially for points 2 and 3 regarding error handling and sensitive data.

Would you like me to provide example code snippets for proper error handling and secure data handling in interceptors?


89-89: Fix hyphenation in "Annotation based".

Add a hyphen for consistency with technical writing standards.

-- Attribute/Annotation based interception
++ Attribute/Annotation-based interception

99-113: Enhance error handling example with more specific exception types.

Consider expanding the error handling example to demonstrate handling different types of exceptions and logging.

 try {
     return $object->$method(...$params);
-} catch (Throwable $e) {
-    // Handle or transform the error
-    throw new CustomException("Error in {$method}: " . $e->getMessage());
+} catch (InvalidArgumentException $e) {
+    // Handle validation errors
+    throw new CustomValidationException("Invalid parameters in {$method}: " . $e->getMessage());
+} catch (Throwable $e) {
+    // Log unexpected errors
+    error_log("Unexpected error in {$method}: " . $e->getMessage());
+    throw new CustomException("Error in {$method}", 0, $e);
 }

160-160: Improve grammar in method description.

Revise the future tense usage for better technical writing.

-When disabled, intercepted methods will execute normally.
+When disabled, intercepted methods execute normally.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[grammar] ~160-~160: Future tense may not be necessary in this context (after ‘when’).
Context: ...lly. When disabled, intercepted methods will execute normally. - Parameters: - `$ena...

(WHEN_I_WILL)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 38d2998 and ba20434.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md

[uncategorized] ~90-~90: This expression is usually spelled with a hyphen.
Context: ...ple interceptors per method - Attribute/Annotation based interception - Sophisticated AOP featur...

(BASED_HYPHEN)


[grammar] ~160-~160: Future tense may not be necessary in this context (after ‘when’).
Context: ...lly. When disabled, intercepted methods will execute normally. - Parameters: - `$ena...

(WHEN_I_WILL)


[misspelling] ~204-~204: This word is normally spelled as one.
Context: ... Faults - Ensure Thread-Safe PHP in multi-threaded environments - Check memory limits ...

(EN_COMPOUNDS_MULTI_THREADED)

🪛 Markdownlint
README.md

142-142: Expected: 2; Actual: 4
Unordered list indentation

(MD007, ul-indent)


143-143: Expected: 2; Actual: 4
Unordered list indentation

(MD007, ul-indent)


144-144: Expected: 2; Actual: 4
Unordered list indentation

(MD007, ul-indent)


162-162: Expected: 2; Actual: 4
Unordered list indentation

(MD007, ul-indent)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)

7-16: LGTM! Clear introduction and comprehensive features list.

The introduction effectively explains the extension's purpose and its relationship with Ray.Aop. The features section provides a good overview of the extension's capabilities.

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
php_rayaop.h (1)

136-144: Add documentation for utility and memory management functions.

Consider adding documentation comments for the new functions to describe:

  • Parameters and their types
  • Return values
  • Error conditions
  • Usage examples

Example format:

/**
 * Generates a key for the intercept hash table
 *
 * @param class_name The name of the class to intercept
 * @param method_name The name of the method to intercept
 * @param key_len Output parameter for the generated key length
 * @return char* The generated key (must be freed by caller)
 */
PHP_RAYAOP_API char *php_rayaop_generate_key(zend_string *class_name, 
    zend_string *method_name, size_t *key_len);
README.md (4)

16-16: Improve grammar in feature description.

Add the preposition "of" for better readability.

-- Memory-efficient interception handling
++ Memory-efficient handling of interception
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~16-~16: Possible missing preposition found.
Context: ...- Debug mode with configurable levels - Memory-efficient interception handling ## Req...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_OF)


90-90: Fix hyphenation in feature description.

Add a hyphen for consistent terminology.

-- Attribute/Annotation based interception
++ Attribute/Annotation-based interception
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~90-~90: This expression is usually spelled with a hyphen.
Context: ...ple interceptors per method - Attribute/Annotation based interception - Sophisticated AOP featur...

(BASED_HYPHEN)


160-160: Simplify tense in method description.

Remove future tense for clearer documentation.

-- When disabled, intercepted methods will execute normally.
++ When disabled, intercepted methods execute normally.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[grammar] ~160-~160: Future tense may not be necessary in this context (after ‘when’).
Context: ...lly. When disabled, intercepted methods will execute normally. - Parameters: - `$ena...

(WHEN_I_WILL)


204-204: Fix compound word spelling.

Use the standard compound form.

-- Ensure Thread-Safe PHP in multi-threaded environments
++ Ensure Thread-Safe PHP in multithreaded environments
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[misspelling] ~204-~204: This word is normally spelled as one.
Context: ... Faults - Ensure Thread-Safe PHP in multi-threaded environments - Check memory limits ...

(EN_COMPOUNDS_MULTI_THREADED)

rayaop.c (2)

115-120: Consider caching frequently used keys.

The key generation function creates a new string for each lookup. For frequently intercepted methods, consider implementing a key cache to reduce memory allocations.


459-478: Consider adding memory usage statistics to debug output.

The debug dump function could be enhanced to include memory usage statistics for better diagnostics.

Add memory usage info to the debug dump:

        php_printf("=== Intercept Information Dump ===\n");
+       php_printf("Memory Usage: %zu bytes\n", zend_memory_usage(0));
        php_rayaop_intercept_info *info;
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ba20434 and a76feaa.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • php_rayaop.h (1 hunks)
  • rayaop.c (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
php_rayaop.h (1)
Learnt from: koriym
PR: ray-di/ext-rayaop#7
File: rayaop.c:250-274
Timestamp: 2024-11-05T09:05:10.936Z
Learning: In `rayaop.c`, when cleaning up `php_rayaop_intercept_info` structures upon failure, we can use `php_rayaop_free_intercept_info` by passing a temporary `zval` containing the pointer to `info`.
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md

[uncategorized] ~16-~16: Possible missing preposition found.
Context: ...- Debug mode with configurable levels - Memory-efficient interception handling ## Req...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_OF)


[uncategorized] ~90-~90: This expression is usually spelled with a hyphen.
Context: ...ple interceptors per method - Attribute/Annotation based interception - Sophisticated AOP featur...

(BASED_HYPHEN)


[grammar] ~160-~160: Future tense may not be necessary in this context (after ‘when’).
Context: ...lly. When disabled, intercepted methods will execute normally. - Parameters: - `$ena...

(WHEN_I_WILL)


[misspelling] ~204-~204: This word is normally spelled as one.
Context: ... Faults - Ensure Thread-Safe PHP in multi-threaded environments - Check memory limits ...

(EN_COMPOUNDS_MULTI_THREADED)

🪛 Markdownlint
README.md

142-142: Expected: 2; Actual: 4
Unordered list indentation

(MD007, ul-indent)


143-143: Expected: 2; Actual: 4
Unordered list indentation

(MD007, ul-indent)


144-144: Expected: 2; Actual: 4
Unordered list indentation

(MD007, ul-indent)


162-162: Expected: 2; Actual: 4
Unordered list indentation

(MD007, ul-indent)

🪛 cppcheck
rayaop.c

[error] 42-42: There is an unknown macro here somewhere. Configuration is required. If ZEND_BEGIN_ARG_INFO_EX is a macro then please configure it.

(unknownMacro)

🔇 Additional comments (13)
php_rayaop.h (5)

12-24: LGTM! Well-organized header inclusion.

The headers are properly organized with system headers first, followed by PHP core headers in the correct order.


31-31: Verify the MAX_EXECUTION_DEPTH constant value.

The value of 100 for MAX_EXECUTION_DEPTH seems arbitrary. Please verify if this limit is sufficient for your use cases and consider making it configurable through PHP INI settings.

Consider adding an INI setting:

PHP_INI_BEGIN()
    STD_PHP_INI_ENTRY("rayaop.max_execution_depth", "100", PHP_INI_ALL, OnUpdateLong, max_execution_depth, zend_rayaop_globals, rayaop_globals)
PHP_INI_END()

51-53: Skip: Issue already identified in previous review.

A previous review comment already addresses the use of _IS_BOOL instead of IS_BOOL.


65-79: LGTM! Proper thread safety implementation.

The mutex implementation correctly handles both Windows and POSIX systems, with proper locking macros for thread-safe builds.


105-112: Ensure proper cleanup of global resources.

The module globals structure contains several fields that need proper cleanup in RSHUTDOWN:

  • intercept_ht should be destroyed
  • All counters should be reset
  • Debug level should be reset

Let's verify if RSHUTDOWN properly cleans up these resources:

README.md (5)

40-53: LGTM! Clear and comprehensive installation instructions.

The installation steps and configuration examples are well-structured and provide all necessary information.


83-96: LGTM! Clear explanation of Ray.Aop integration.

The section effectively communicates the relationship between the extension and Ray.Aop, with clear delineation of responsibilities.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~90-~90: This expression is usually spelled with a hyphen.
Context: ...ple interceptors per method - Attribute/Annotation based interception - Sophisticated AOP featur...

(BASED_HYPHEN)


97-130: LGTM! Well-documented code examples.

The examples effectively demonstrate error handling and parameter modification use cases.


270-276: LGTM! Clear license and attribution.

The license and credits information is appropriately documented.


258-258: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix syntax in memory leak check command.

Add missing closing parenthesis.

-5. Run memory leak checks (`make test TESTS="-m"`)
+5. Run memory leak checks (`make test TESTS="-m"`)

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

rayaop.c (3)

51-94: LGTM! Robust error handling and memory management.

The error handling is well-structured with specific error codes, and the memory management functions properly handle resource cleanup with appropriate locking.


208-209: ⚠️ Potential issue

Remove duplicate prepare_intercept_params call.

The function is called twice consecutively, which could lead to memory leaks and incorrect behavior.

Apply this fix:

-           prepare_intercept_params(execute_data, params, info);
            if (!prepare_intercept_params(execute_data, params, info)) {

32-37: Add argument info declarations for new functions.

The new functions method_intercept_init and method_intercept_enable are added to rayaop_functions, but their argument info declarations are not visible in the provided code.

Comment on lines +199 to +204
if (Z_TYPE(info->handler) != IS_OBJECT) {
php_rayaop_handle_error(RAYAOP_E_INVALID_HANDLER, "Invalid interceptor type");
if (php_rayaop_original_execute_ex) {
php_rayaop_original_execute_ex(execute_data);
}
} else {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Improve error handling for invalid interceptor.

When an invalid interceptor is detected, the code falls through to execute the original function but doesn't clean up allocated resources.

Add cleanup before executing the original function:

        if (Z_TYPE(info->handler) != IS_OBJECT) {
            php_rayaop_handle_error(RAYAOP_E_INVALID_HANDLER, "Invalid interceptor type");
+           efree(key);
+           RAYAOP_G(execution_depth)--;
            if (php_rayaop_original_execute_ex) {
                php_rayaop_original_execute_ex(execute_data);
            }
+           return;
        }

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

koriym added 17 commits November 5, 2024 22:51
The change adds an additional null checking condition before copying the return value in the call intercept handler method. This is to avoid a potential null pointer dereference. In case of a null value, a debug warning message is logged.
Increased the detail and scope of debug information during function execution. Refactored the interception process by handling the case when intercept info was not found, improving the overall flow and error handling. Removed some hard-coded function skipping, streamlining the process.
Interface method interception has been enabled in the basic and multiple interceptors tests. This was done by adding a line to turn on method interceptor, ensuring that the test conditions for these methods fully reflect the expected functionality.
Two new assertions were added to the 'rayaop-loaded' test to check if 'method_intercept_init' and 'enable_method_intercept' functions exist. This ensures that all necessary functions for 'rayaop' are loaded and available for use.
Added a step in the GitHub actions build workflow to create a custom php.ini file and modified the tests run step to use this custom php.ini. This ensures any required PHP extensions, like 'rayaop.so', are loaded for the test environment.
The code change comments out the RAYAOP_DEBUG definition in rayaop.c. This disables the debug mode for RayAOP extension, presumably for production use where debug information is not required or desired.
This commit introduces AddressSanitizer support to the project by adding necessary flags and paths to the config.m4 file. It incorporates AddressSanitizer library with the PHP extension and updates the compiler and linker flags. It also adds specific include and library paths necessary for the AddressSanitizer functionality.
The changes revolve around the AddressSanitizer settings in the config.m4 file. The library paths and include directories have been altered and encompassed within square brackets for consistency. Moreover, the compiler and linker flags have been updated, which include "-g -O0" for debug information and to disable optimizations.
Streamlined header definitions and cleaned unused comments for better readability. Introduced new features like error codes, thread safety macros, debug printing, and globals initialization. Improved memory and error handling, structured module functions, and implemented a maximum execution depth check to prevent infinite recursion.
This change upgrades the GitHub Actions 'upload-artifact' step from version 2 to version 4. This should ensure compatibility with the latest features and improvements provided in the newer version.
Added method interception capabilities including new interface and argument declarations for method interceptors. Also improved error handling by introducing detailed error messages and checking for memory allocation failures, ensuring robustness and easier debugging.
This commit deletes the check that warned and returned false when method interception was disabled. Removing this allows the function to proceed without checking the global flag RAYAOP_G(method_intercept_enabled). This change simplifies the code by eliminating an unnecessary condition.
Introduced a new test to verify the handling of maximum recursion depth and errors in the RayAOP extension. The test ensures that recursive method calls are properly managed to prevent infinite loops and checks the error handling for invalid input parameters.
This test ensures that multiple interceptors are executed in the correct LIFO order. It registers two interceptors for a method in TestClass and verifies the output. This helps in validating the proper functionality of the interceptor implementation.
This new test verifies that the RayAOP extension correctly manages memory when handling numerous interceptors. It ensures memory usage remains within acceptable limits and verifies proper resource cleanup.
Introduces a new PHPT test to ensure concurrent operation safety for RayAOP interceptors. This test registers multiple interceptors quickly and checks their execution to confirm the stability and correctness under concurrent conditions.
Added the /modules/rayaop.so file to the .gitignore to prevent it from being tracked by Git. This helps maintain a cleaner repository and prevents unnecessary files from being committed.
koriym and others added 21 commits November 5, 2024 22:51
Introduce a new test to verify the interception capability for final classes and methods provided by the RayAOP extension. This includes setting up an interceptor, running the test scenario, and checking the expected output.
Update the README with detailed installation steps, expanded usage examples, and a comprehensive explanation of the extension's design. Clarify the relationship and integration with Ray.Aop and provide concise instructions for building, testing, and contributing to the project.
Updated the request initialization function to properly save the original `zend_execute_ex` and fixed the error message for memory allocation failure. Additionally, ensured that the `zend_execute_ex` handler is set correctly when method interception is enabled.
Deleted the '005-rayaop-max-recursion.phpt' file that tested the RayAOP extension for recursion and null parameter errors. This removal suggests these tests are either obsolete, redundant, or handled elsewhere.

INVALID test, no meaning.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Renamed `enable_method_intercept` to `method_intercept_enable` across all relevant files for consistency. Adjusted test cases and function implementations to reflect the new naming convention.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
The GitHub Actions 'checkout' has been updated from v2 to v4. This change ensures compatibility with the latest features and improvements in the 'checkout' action.
Previously, on error, the function manually released class and method names, destroyed the handler, and freed the info structure. This commit centralizes cleanup logic by using `php_rayaop_free_intercept_info()` for better maintainability and clarity.
Consolidate intercept info cleanup into a single function call to enhance code maintainability and readability. Replace manual resource release with `php_rayaop_free_intercept_info` ensuring consistent cleanup logic.
This commit introduces a call to cleanup_intercept_params() in case prepare_intercept_params() fails. This ensures that memory is properly managed and potential leaks are avoided, improving the stability of the program.
Added missing destruction for the first element of the params array to prevent memory leaks. This ensures all elements of the array are properly deallocated, maintaining the stability and efficiency of the code.
Enhanced the RayAOP thread safety test to include varied parameters and error condition handling. Added detailed output statements to better observe interceptor activities and test outcomes. Refactored the test structure for improved readability and comprehensiveness.
…tions

Updated the README.md to provide comprehensive details on method interception features, security considerations, installation steps, usage examples, and advanced configurations. This includes thread safety guidelines, error handling examples, performance considerations, and troubleshooting tips. Added new sections for API reference, memory management, debug mode, and contribution guidelines.
Updated the method interception documentation to specify that only one interceptor can be active per method at a time. Added details about potential errors and clarified parameter descriptions for better understanding.
Introduce mutex allocation and locking mechanisms in ZTS mode to ensure thread safety. This includes defining the MUTEX_T type, allocating and freeing the mutex during module initialization and shutdown, and utilizing it for global locks.
Streamlined content for clarity and conciseness. Removed security considerations, advanced usage, and extensive API reference sections. Simplified configuration instructions and emphasized basic usage and installation steps. Updated features and recommendations to be more succinct.
This update thanks JetBrains for their CLion IDE, highlighting its free availability under an Open Source License. The acknowledgment emphasizes the tool's role in enhancing project development.
@koriym koriym force-pushed the method_intercept_init2 branch from a76feaa to f50ea2f Compare November 5, 2024 14:01
@koriym koriym merged commit 08eed49 into 1.x Nov 5, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant