-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 52
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Code of conduct update - june 30th 2024 #311
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
PR Summary
|
✅ Deploy Preview for reactiflux ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
1. **Respect that people have differences of opinion.** Every design or implementation choice carries a trade-off and numerous costs. There is seldom a single right answer. | ||
1. **Keep unstructured critique to a minimum.** When providing help, answer their question before making stylistic or tool suggestions. | ||
1. **Avoid recurring disruptive participation** If the majority of members find your interactions contributing to a negative or hostile social environment and report it as such, and if upon moderator investigation there is evidence that you have been, it will be considered a disruption an infractions will be applied. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Phrasing here is slightly confusing to me, and I think I'm not happy with the "majority of members" phrasing — doesn't seem like the kind of clear-cut guidance on participation that I think is best to have in a code of conduct. Majority as defined how? Strictly speaking, this could be reasonably interpreted as "majority of the >220k accounts in the server"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Gotcha - someone from the mod team suggested this snippet from the CoC of one of the Discord's they're in.
Would something like the following make more sense:
If staff finds that your interactions consistently contribute to a negative or hostile social environment, it will be considered a disruption an infractions might be applied.
Added a section about continuous disruptive behaviour, slightly extended the discrimination section