Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert Back Scatter changes #392

Closed

Conversation

infinitephantasm
Copy link
Contributor

@infinitephantasm infinitephantasm commented Nov 13, 2023

my original intention for this weapon was to have it so the crit aim that existed for soldier would work here. it'd deal less damage than a regular scattergun, but the crit aim was the primary benefit and to mix-up the weapon.

crit aim is gone now, and as such, this weapon's primary purpose is also gone. right now, it is just a less useful scattergun/rocket launcher that does worse damage and is overall not worth using. for now, i'd just like this to be reverted back to its regular stats. maybe someone can come up with something like replacing the specific back minicrits with crits at some point.

my original intention for this weapon was to have it so the crit aim that existed for soldier would work here. it'd deal less damage than a regular scattergun, but the crit aim was the primary benefit and to mix-up the weapon.

crit aim is gone now, and as such, this weapon's primary purpose is also gone. right now, it is just a less useful scattergun that does worse damage and is overall not worth using. for now, i'd just like this to be reverted back to its regular stats. maybe someone can come up with something like replacing the specific back minicrits with crits at some point.
@FortyTwoFortyTwo
Copy link
Member

Added no distance dmg falloff to Back Scatter, though it may still need a general damage buff, see how it goes for now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants