You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think there are a lot of systems in facilities running long outdated library versions, SINQ instuments included. (Our cluster has python 3.4, for example.)
I don't think python security updates are a big concern for systems not used in webservers and/or within confined networks. So as long as the effort is limited I'd keep it compatible.
Last time I looked (January) 3.11 didn't have many relevant libraries available, so I would see compatibility with 3.11 as less important then 3.6.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point - there are many ancient machines running instruments around the world, though virtual environments/conda make it a lot easier to work with more modern python versions wherever you are, and without requiring superuser privileges.
efd3abb
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there a pressing need for 3.6? It is not receiving even security updates anymore.
efd3abb
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think there are a lot of systems in facilities running long outdated library versions, SINQ instuments included. (Our cluster has python 3.4, for example.)
I don't think python security updates are a big concern for systems not used in webservers and/or within confined networks. So as long as the effort is limited I'd keep it compatible.
Last time I looked (January) 3.11 didn't have many relevant libraries available, so I would see compatibility with 3.11 as less important then 3.6.
efd3abb
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point - there are many ancient machines running instruments around the world, though virtual environments/conda make it a lot easier to work with more modern python versions wherever you are, and without requiring superuser privileges.