CONTRIBUTING.md: fix charter link (s/rfcedtyp/group/) #32
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rjsparks
reviewed
Mar 29, 2024
CONTRIBUTING.md
Outdated
| @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ | |||
|
|
|||
| Anyone can contribute to RSWG; you don't have to join the Working Group, because there is no "membership" -- anyone who participates in the work, as outlined below, is part of the RSWG Working Group. | |||
|
|
|||
| Before doing so, it's a good idea to familiarize yourself with our [charter](https://datatracker.ietf.org/rfcedtyp/rswg/about/). If you're new to this, you may also want to read [an informal guide to the IETF process](https://www.ietf.org/standards/process/informal/) and the [Tao of the IETF](https://www.ietf.org/tao.html). | |||
| Before doing so, it's a good idea to familiarize yourself with our [charter](https://datatracker.ietf.org/edwg/rswg/about/). If you're new to this, you may also want to read [an informal guide to the IETF process](https://www.ietf.org/standards/process/informal/) and the [Tao of the IETF](https://www.ietf.org/tao.html). | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| Before doing so, it's a good idea to familiarize yourself with our [charter](https://datatracker.ietf.org/edwg/rswg/about/). If you're new to this, you may also want to read [an informal guide to the IETF process](https://www.ietf.org/standards/process/informal/) and the [Tao of the IETF](https://www.ietf.org/tao.html). | |
| Before doing so, it's a good idea to familiarize yourself with our [charter](https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/rswg/about/). If you're new to this, you may also want to read [an informal guide to the IETF process](https://www.ietf.org/standards/process/informal/) and the [Tao of the IETF](https://www.ietf.org/tao.html). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Using the generic "group" selector instead of the group_type selector is far more future-proof.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Using the generic "group" selector instead of the group_type selector is far more future-proof.
Indeed, thank you for the suggestion! I had no idea that existed.
I fixed the commit accordingly and credited you in the commit
message, but please also feel free to drop this PR entirely and
submit or commit the fix yourself instead.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/rfcedtyp/rswg/about/ is defunct. Using the generic "group" selector suggested (as more future-proof than just replacing "rfcedtyp" with the current "edwg") by Robert Sparks.
stepnem
force-pushed
the
fix-charter-link
branch
from
7406a07
to
3821adb
Compare
stepnem
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/rfcedtyp/rswg/about/ is defunct.