Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Explore
By company size
By use case
By industry
View all solutions
Topics
- AI
- DevOps
- Security
- Software Development
- View all
Explore
- GitHub Sponsors
  Fund open source developers
- The ReadME Project
  GitHub community articles
Repositories
- Enterprise platform
  AI-powered developer platform
Available add-ons
Pricing

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Search

Clear

Search syntax tips

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Include my email address so I can be contacted

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Name

Query

To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.

You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.

Dismiss alert

riganti / dotvvm Public

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings
Fork 97
Star 754

Code
Issues 143
Pull requests 28
Actions
Projects 1
Wiki
Security
Insights

Additional navigation options

Code
Issues
Pull requests
Actions
Projects
Wiki
Security
Insights

Identify DotvvmProperty with systematic 32-bit IDs#1867

Draft

exyi wants to merge 3 commits intomainriganti/dotvvm:mainfrom property-dict-refactorriganti/dotvvm:property-dict-refactorCopy head branch name to clipboard

+2,291-528

Conversation Commits3 (3)Checks Files changed

Commits

Commits on Dec 8, 2024

Refactoring of DotvvmProperty value storage
exyi
committed
DotvvmPropertyId: encode in ID if we can use direct dict access or virtual GetValue
exyi
committed
Fix leaking of dictionary changes between cloned controls
exyi
committed

Footer

© 2024 GitHub, Inc.

Footer navigation

Terms
Privacy
Security
Status
Docs
Contact

You can’t perform that action at this time.