Use flags for generating missing function names #335
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
thestr4ng3r
force-pushed
the
generic-function-name
branch
from
ae70e3c
to
23924c7
Compare
When there is no rizin function, but a flag and we need to generate some function name there, we can use the flag name instead of the default behavior, which is to call it "func_<addr>".
thestr4ng3r
force-pushed
the
generic-function-name
branch
from
23924c7
to
de47f76
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When there is no rizin function, but a flag and we need to generate some function name there, we can use the flag name instead of the default behavior, which is to call it "func_".