Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TestNetSetup #194

Merged
merged 21 commits into from
Jan 13, 2025
Merged

TestNetSetup #194

merged 21 commits into from
Jan 13, 2025

Conversation

ashi31
Copy link
Contributor

@ashi31 ashi31 commented Jul 25, 2024

This is to update the test tokens structure to faucetName + token_level + token_number. This token structure is to be used to create test RBTs in the faucet node.

CLI Command
./rubixgoplatform generatefaucetrbt -numTokens 2 -did bafybmif2cnmxooupsefy2rdy3vf3yt7xoojess4zedmoqvh3neezhi6uyq -port 20000

API request
curl --header "Content-Type: application/json" --request POST 'http://localhost:20000/api/generate-faucettest-token' --data '{"did": "bafybmif2cnmxooupsefy2rdy3vf3yt7xoojess4zedmoqvh3neezhi6uyq", "number_of_tokens":1 }'

Once we input the token level, all the tokens of that level will be generated within the faucet. The faucetName const FaucetName can be updated in tokenmapping.go file.

To check the content of token and validate the faucet token and its corresponding genesys block to verify the owner and signature of the token as being the same as the faucetDID:
CLI command
./rubixgoplatform faucettokencheck -token QmcE8pm9p1ZUP7PGkFR5CrZsZzQkNoXB9Szy1Ns2DFQraw -port 20000

API request
curl -X GET "http://localhost:20000/api/faucet-token-check?token=QmcE8pm9p1ZUP7PGkFR5CrZsZzQkNoXB9Szy1Ns2DFQraw"

Sample output :
Token owner validated successfully. Token details = Faucet Name : faucet1, Token Level : 3, Token Number : 2

@ashi31 ashi31 requested a review from thewebchap July 25, 2024 10:40
@ashi31 ashi31 self-assigned this Jul 26, 2024
@ashi31 ashi31 linked an issue Jul 26, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
3 tasks
@ashi31 ashi31 requested a review from gklps December 26, 2024 05:07
@thewebchap
Copy link
Member

Do we need to merge this to development branch? Some of the code is specific to only faucet node , questionable whether it needs to be merged and accessible to all nodes.
As I see , some additions are needed for nodes to interact with faucet (this can be merged to development) , the faucet server specific lines can be skipped.
@gklps @arnabghose997 thoughts?

@arnabghose997
Copy link
Collaborator

Do we need to merge this to development branch? Some of the code is specific to only faucet node , questionable whether it needs to be merged and accessible to all nodes. As I see , some additions are needed for nodes to interact with faucet (this can be merged to development) , the faucet server specific lines can be skipped. @gklps @arnabghose997 thoughts?

I believe there isn't any issue with merging the PR dev, since Faucet interaction is centered around Testnet tokens only

@gklps
Copy link
Member

gklps commented Dec 31, 2024

Let's maintain the faucet as its own distinct branch, encompassing all faucet-related additions

@gklps gklps merged commit 82669fc into development Jan 13, 2025
2 of 3 checks passed
@gklps gklps deleted the ashita/testNetFaucet branch January 13, 2025 05:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Rubix Testnet
4 participants