-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 411
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ruby 3.4 Hash#inspect
compatibility.
#709
Conversation
Thank you! Could you please exclude Rails 6.1 + ruby-head from the matrix? |
fa26c6c
to
b0685b8
Compare
These are required for Ruby 3.4 support, which extracts `base64` / `mutex_m` into bundled gem. The maintained versions of Rails have the dependencies updated.
I have included this patch if you prefer: diff --git a/gemfiles/Gemfile.rails-6.1.x b/gemfiles/Gemfile.rails-6.1.x
index 6f67f78..43481a6 100644
--- a/gemfiles/Gemfile.rails-6.1.x
+++ b/gemfiles/Gemfile.rails-6.1.x
@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ gem 'test_declarative', '0.0.6'
gem 'rake'
gem 'minitest', '~> 5.14'
gem 'racc'
+gem 'base64'
+gem 'mutex_m'
platforms :mri do
gem 'oj' |
Rails 8.1 requires Ruby 3.2 at minimum: ~~~ Bundler found conflicting requirements for the Ruby In Gemfile.rails-main: activesupport was resolved to 8.1.0.alpha, which depends on Ruby (>= 3.2.0) ~~~
I'll do that. But it seems the matrix is incomplete. Rails 7.2 / 8.0 should likely be added. |
Agree. Make it so :)
…On Wed, Dec 11, 2024, at 3:35 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> And this combo: https://github.com/ruby-i18n/i18n/actions/runs/12235161164/job/34125870227?pr=709
>
I'll do that. But it seems the matrix is incomplete. Rails 7.2 / 8.0 should likely be added.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#709 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAAU73UADXUJJ4PQKZVHNL2E4J3ZAVCNFSM6AAAAABTIVKC6KVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDKMZSGIZTGNZZGU>.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
7e23f2e
to
2399852
Compare
Done. I have noticed that Also, I'd say that the JRuby might need review. |
Thank you for your diligence. |
No description provided.