feat: Add legal document review use case #467
Conversation
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 10601fb The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a comprehensive contract review use case implemented using the Reflex framework and LlamaIndex. The changes span multiple files across different directories, focusing on creating a new template for automated contract compliance analysis. The implementation includes backend services for contract parsing, guideline matching, and report generation, along with a frontend interface for file uploads and workflow visualization. Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Frontend
participant ContractParser
participant GuidelineService
participant ComplianceAnalyzer
participant ReportGenerator
User->>Frontend: Upload Contract
Frontend->>ContractParser: Parse Contract
ContractParser-->>Frontend: Extracted Contract Data
Frontend->>GuidelineService: Find Relevant Guidelines
GuidelineService-->>ComplianceAnalyzer: Match Guidelines
ComplianceAnalyzer->>ReportGenerator: Generate Compliance Report
ReportGenerator-->>Frontend: Display Compliance Results
Possibly Related PRs
Suggested Reviewers
Poem
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
templates/components/agents/python/contract_review/app/ui/states/workflow.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (34)
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/services/contract_reviewer.py (3)
39-44: Ensure error message clarity and guidance.The raised RuntimeError is appropriate, but consider adding additional guidance or steps for resolving the issue. This helps new contributors or users easily troubleshoot the missing index scenario.
85-110: Validate 0777 file permissions.In lines 105–107, setting the directory permissions to 0o0777 grants full read/write/execute to all users, potentially exposing sensitive work products. Consider restricting permissions to the owner or group (e.g., 0o755) if not strictly required.
289-361: Consider edge cases for zero non-compliant clauses.If every clause is compliant, lines 299–301 skip major logic. This is correct, but ensure that the final report is still generated with a clear “All clauses are compliant” message. This improves clarity for end users.
templates/types/reflex/app/app.py (1)
2-2: Consider grouping imports and adding an explanatory comment.
Importing dotenv is useful for environment variable loading, but it can be beneficial to document that this import is used to auto-load environment variables on app startup. If there are other environment-dependent features, placing them together with dotenv can improve readability.templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/components/workflow/load.py (1)
7-22: Appropriate conditional rendering for loading state.
The load_contract_component uses rx.cond to check if parsing has started, showing a loading spinner and logs when appropriate. This is clear and user-friendly. Just ensure that the ContractLoaderState transitions to a completed or error state if parsing fails, so the UI can handle that case gracefully.templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/components/upload.py (1)
7-30: User-friendly upload workflow with conditional display of filename.
The upload_component provides a clear drag-and-drop or click-to-select mechanism and displays the uploaded file name. This is helpful feedback for users. Ensure that handle_upload properly handles large files, network errors, or invalid formats with friendly error messages.templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/pages/index.py (1)
18-46: Well-structured page layout.
The main layout is composed of stacked elements that clearly guide the user to upload a contract and proceed through the workflow. Each subsection (upload, workflow components) is neatly separated into its own stacked container, making the UI clear and maintainable.Consider adding docstring or inline comments to clarify the responsibilities of each sub-component (e.g. “This container handles file upload,” etc.).
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/config.py (2)
24-31: System-level compliance instructions.
This detailed system prompt fosters structured compliance reporting. No issues found here. Possibly consider referencing domain-specific disclaimers or disclaimers around the accuracy and legal enforceability of generated reports.
33-47: Comprehensive user prompt.
The user prompt is well-structured, guiding the presentation of noncompliant clauses. For thoroughness, you could include the vendor’s location or other relevant metadata if needed for more complex compliance checks.helpers/run-app.ts (1)
61-71: Template type and port assignment changes.
The updated code properly distinguishes template types with theTemplateTypeenum and sets an appropriate default port (3000) for “reflex.” The fallback tofastapiorTSframeworks is clear.As an optional enhancement, consider checking for unsupported template values (e.g. throw an error or fallback) in case future expansions of
TemplateTypeare introduced.templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/components/workflow/report.py (1)
1-2: Use explicit import references as needed
No critical issues here. However, if you anticipate using only a subset of Reflex, consider technique-specific imports (e.g., from reflex import cond) to avoid pulling in unnecessary parts of the framework.e2e/shared/reflex_template.spec.ts (1)
48-50: Graceful termination of child processes
While killing the appProcess is acceptable, ensure that any potential cleanup or teardown code is invoked to avoid orphaned processes or locked resources, particularly if test failures or concurrency issues arise.helpers/types.ts (1)
52-57: Future extensibility
The new "contract_review" agent type is fine. If you plan to add additional specialized agents, consider grouping them or introducing a more descriptive naming convention to avoid potential collisions.templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/states/app.py (1)
16-19: Revisit data classes vs. reflex.Base
Using reflex.Base is valid, but be sure you’re leveraging type-checking effectively. If you need richer validation or nested structures, evaluate the trade-offs between reflex.Base, pydantic models, or standard Python dataclasses.templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/models.py (2)
45-57: Clarify the role of relevance_explanation.
The optional relevance_explanation field can provide crucial context. Ensure that the workflow populates this field when a guideline is partially matched.
75-85: Ensure top-level compliance results are updated accurately.
The overall_compliant and summary_notes are central for the final assessment. Verify that any partial compliance or conflicting clauses update the final boolean and recommendation text properly.templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/components/workflow/guideline.py (2)
46-83: Use table headers consistently for clarity.
The table displays Clause and Guideline but the difference between “clause_text” and “notes” might confuse end-users. Consider adding an extra header for “Compliance Notes” or “Recommendations.”
85-113: Smooth user experience with guideline_component.
The conditional logic is well-built. Verify performance if the log grows large. We might need a more scalable approach if many guidelines produce numerous logs.templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/states/workflow.py (2)
43-73: Prevent overshadowing at class-level attributes.
Theis_runningandis_startedfields in GuidelineState are similar to ContractLoaderState. This redundancy is acceptable if their states are truly independent. Otherwise, consider a shared base class if they share identical logic.
113-137: ReportState final tasks.
Thesaved_pathandresultfields are updated at step completion. Consider logging an event for confirmations or error handling if the path is invalid.questions/simple.ts (2)
60-60: Unified prompt handlingSkipping language and LlamaCloud prompts for "extractor" and "contract_review" is clear, but might become repetitive if more specialized templates emerge. Consider a single conditional group or mapping for future scalability.
181-187: New "contract_review" app typeDefining "contract_review" as "reflex" is coherent with the rest of the changes. Consider including a new unit test or E2E test coverage to verify that contract review flows (e.g., data downloads, workflow steps) work as expected.
helpers/index.ts (1)
121-122: Conditional naming logic for downloaded filesFalling back to the URL’s basename is a good idea. However, consider adding checks to avoid filename collisions if multiple data sources share the same name. This is not urgent but could strengthen resilience.
helpers/typescript.ts (1)
156-156: Consider including a period or clarifying the message for different templates.Currently, the error message mentions only "multiagent" while also covering the "reflex" condition in other parts of the code. This may cause confusion if triggered for the "reflex" template.
You could update it as follows:
-`There is no agent selected for ${template} template. Please pick an agent to use via --agents flag.`, +`No agent selected for the ${template} template. Please pick an agent to use via --agents flag.`questions/questions.ts (1)
357-358: Ensure consistent handling of 'reflex' with LlamaParse.Here you explicitly skip prompting for LlamaParse on the 'reflex' template. Consider adding a descriptive message or UI note to inform users they cannot enable LlamaParse under 'reflex.'
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/example_vendor_agreement.md (3)
5-5: Remove trailing punctuation from heading.“## Parties:” contains a colon that markdownlint flags.
-## Parties: +## Parties🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)
5-5: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
60-60: Minor punctuation suggestion after "including".Add a comma or rephrase for clarity.
-Vendor shall implement appropriate measures including: +Vendor shall implement appropriate measures, including:🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~60-~60: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...res Vendor shall implement appropriate measures including: - Encryption of Personal Da...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
130-130: Avoid using emphasis instead of a heading.Markdownlint suggests using actual headings instead of emphasized text for sections.
-**LlamaCo** +## LlamaCo🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)
130-130: null
Emphasis used instead of a heading(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/README-template.md (6)
27-27: Format URL using markdown syntaxConvert the bare URL to markdown format for better readability and consistency.
-To deploy the application, refer to the Reflex deployment guide: https://reflex.dev/docs/hosting/deploy-quick-start/ +To deploy the application, refer to the [Reflex deployment guide](https://reflex.dev/docs/hosting/deploy-quick-start/)🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)
27-27: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
13-13: Enhance .env configuration guidanceConsider adding example configurations to help users set up their environment correctly.
-Then check the parameters that have been pre-configured in the `.env` file in this directory. (E.g. you might need to configure an `OPENAI_API_KEY` if you're using OpenAI as model provider). +Then check the parameters that have been pre-configured in the `.env` file in this directory: + +```env +# Required: Your OpenAI API key if using OpenAI as model provider +OPENAI_API_KEY=sk-... + +# Optional: Model configuration +MODEL_NAME=gpt-4 +TEMPERATURE=0.7 +```
31-31: Format URL using markdown syntaxConvert the bare URL to markdown format for better readability and consistency.
-The application provides an interactive web interface accessible at http://localhost:3000 for testing the contract review workflow. +The application provides an interactive web interface accessible at [http://localhost:3000](http://localhost:3000) for testing the contract review workflow.🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)
31-31: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
40-45: Add processing time expectationsConsider adding information about expected processing times for document analysis to set proper user expectations.
2. Review Process: - The system will automatically analyze your document against compliance guidelines - By default, it uses [GDPR](./data/gdpr.pdf) as the compliance benchmark - Custom guidelines can be used by adding your policy documents to the `./data` directory and running `poetry run generate` to update the embeddings + - The analysis typically takes 1-2 minutes depending on the document size and complexity
47-52: Enhance development guidelinesConsider adding more detailed development information to help contributors get started.
### Development You can start editing the backend workflow by modifying the [`ContractReviewWorkflow`](./app/services/contract_reviewer.py). For UI, you can start looking at the [`AppState`](./app/ui/states/app.py) code and navigating to the appropriate components. + +#### Project Structure +``` +app/ +├── services/ # Backend services +│ └── contract_reviewer.py +├── ui/ # Frontend components +│ ├── components/ # Reusable UI components +│ └── states/ # Application state management +└── main.py # Application entry point +``` + +#### Development Workflow +1. Make changes to the code +2. Run tests: `poetry run pytest` +3. Format code: `poetry run black .` +4. Start the development server: `poetry run reflex run`
53-59: Add Reflex-specific resourcesSince the project uses Reflex as a key technology, consider adding Reflex-specific learning resources.
## Learn More To learn more about LlamaIndex, take a look at the following resources: - [LlamaIndex Documentation](https://docs.llamaindex.ai) - learn about LlamaIndex. + +To learn more about Reflex, check out: + +- [Reflex Documentation](https://reflex.dev/docs) - learn about Reflex +- [Reflex Examples](https://reflex.dev/docs/gallery) - explore example applications You can check out [the LlamaIndex GitHub repository](https://github.com/run-llama/llama_index) - your feedback and contributions are welcome!
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (35)
.changeset/stale-scissors-turn.md(1 hunks)e2e/shared/extractor_template.spec.ts(0 hunks)e2e/shared/reflex_template.spec.ts(1 hunks)e2e/utils.ts(1 hunks)helpers/datasources.ts(2 hunks)helpers/index.ts(2 hunks)helpers/python.ts(2 hunks)helpers/run-app.ts(2 hunks)helpers/types.ts(2 hunks)helpers/typescript.ts(1 hunks)index.ts(1 hunks)questions/datasources.ts(1 hunks)questions/questions.ts(2 hunks)questions/simple.ts(5 hunks)templates/components/reflex/contract_review/README-template.md(1 hunks)templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/config.py(1 hunks)templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/models.py(1 hunks)templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/services/contract_reviewer.py(1 hunks)templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/components/__init__.py(1 hunks)templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/components/shared/__init__.py(1 hunks)templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/components/shared/card.py(1 hunks)templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/components/upload.py(1 hunks)templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/components/workflow/__init__.py(1 hunks)templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/components/workflow/guideline.py(1 hunks)templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/components/workflow/load.py(1 hunks)templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/components/workflow/report.py(1 hunks)templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/pages/index.py(1 hunks)templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/states/__init__.py(1 hunks)templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/states/app.py(1 hunks)templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/states/workflow.py(1 hunks)templates/components/reflex/contract_review/example_vendor_agreement.md(1 hunks)templates/components/reflex/contract_review/pyproject.toml(1 hunks)templates/components/reflex/extractor/app/ui/pages/__init__.py(1 hunks)templates/types/reflex/app/api/routers/main.py(1 hunks)templates/types/reflex/app/app.py(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- e2e/shared/extractor_template.spec.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- .changeset/stale-scissors-turn.md
- templates/components/reflex/extractor/app/ui/pages/init.py
- templates/types/reflex/app/api/routers/main.py
- templates/components/reflex/contract_review/pyproject.toml
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (18)
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/pages/index.py (1)
Pattern templates/**: For files under the templates folder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/components/workflow/load.py (1)
Pattern templates/**: For files under the templates folder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/components/workflow/__init__.py (1)
Pattern templates/**: For files under the templates folder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/components/shared/__init__.py (1)
Pattern templates/**: For files under the templates folder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/components/upload.py (1)
Pattern templates/**: For files under the templates folder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/components/workflow/report.py (1)
Pattern templates/**: For files under the templates folder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.
templates/types/reflex/app/app.py (1)
Pattern templates/**: For files under the templates folder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/components/shared/card.py (1)
Pattern templates/**: For files under the templates folder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/components/__init__.py (1)
Pattern templates/**: For files under the templates folder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/example_vendor_agreement.md (1)
Pattern templates/**: For files under the templates folder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/config.py (1)
Pattern templates/**: For files under the templates folder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/components/workflow/guideline.py (1)
Pattern templates/**: For files under the templates folder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/states/__init__.py (1)
Pattern templates/**: For files under the templates folder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/models.py (1)
Pattern templates/**: For files under the templates folder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/states/app.py (1)
Pattern templates/**: For files under the templates folder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/services/contract_reviewer.py (1)
Pattern templates/**: For files under the templates folder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/states/workflow.py (1)
Pattern templates/**: For files under the templates folder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/README-template.md (1)
Pattern templates/**: For files under the templates folder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.
🪛 LanguageTool
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/example_vendor_agreement.md
[uncategorized] ~60-~60: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...res Vendor shall implement appropriate measures including: - Encryption of Personal Da...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/example_vendor_agreement.md
5-5: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading
(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
130-130: null
Emphasis used instead of a heading
(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/README-template.md
27-27: null
Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
31-31: null
Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
🔇 Additional comments (39)
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/services/contract_reviewer.py (3)
53-58: Enum usage is clear and well-organized.
Defining these step names in an enum simplifies referencing them throughout the workflow. The code is readable and self-descriptive.
110-176: Excellent step-based parsing approach.
The asynchronous method for contract parsing is well-structured:
• Logging is comprehensive.
• The “@step” decorator clearly identifies state transitions.
• Context usage for storing intermediate data is consistent.
Just ensure that large files do not exceed memory limits when loaded entirely into memory.
205-258: Graceful handling of empty guideline retrieval.
When guidelines are not found (line 227–228), the code concatenates an empty string which might be acceptable, but ensure that downstream steps gracefully handle a scenario where no relevant guidelines exist.
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/components/shared/__init__.py (1)
1-5: Exporting the card component.
The addition of “card_component” to all is correct for a modular design. This ensures that other modules can import the card UI seamlessly.
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/components/workflow/__init__.py (1)
1-9: Well-structured workflow component exports.
The explicit all definition clarifies the public API, making it easy to track exported components.
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/components/__init__.py (1)
1-9: Clear module interface definition.
Defining the UI components in all fosters consistency across the codebase, ensuring each component’s purpose is well-defined and discoverable.
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/states/__init__.py (1)
1-15: State classes are logically grouped.
Exporting states in a single place clarifies the contract review application’s high-level state machine. The code is concise and well-structured.
templates/types/reflex/app/app.py (2)
10-10: Confirm that the new router import meets all endpoint requirements.
You replaced the old router with api_router. Ensure that it includes all the relevant endpoints (including previous ones) so no functionality is lost. If certain endpoints were moved or renamed, verify they are still accessible.
18-18: Router inclusion looks good.
By calling include_router(api_router), you simplify the routing logic. This is more maintainable than manually adding each router. No issues spotted here.
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/components/shared/card.py (1)
4-20: Well-structured and reusable card component.
The function card_component neatly encapsulates a card UI with titles, dividers, and optional loading states. This approach is maintainable and encourages consistent styling.
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/pages/index.py (3)
1-2: Imports look organized and clear.
The import statements logically group Reflex and your application-specific modules. No issues found here.
Also applies to: 3-8
9-9: Template import usage is consistent.
Using a dedicated template decorator is a clean approach to structure your Reflex app’s routing and layout.
12-16: Route definition is appropriate.
Defining the route as "/" is sensible for a main page; the title is informative. This is aligned with standard usage of Reflex decorators.
questions/datasources.ts (1)
52-52: Confirm template-specific logic.
The conditional now only displays extra data source options if the framework is “fastapi” and the template is NOT “reflex”. Ensure this is intentional—if you need those options in the Reflex flow, you might want to revisit the condition.
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/config.py (3)
1-2: Global directories declared.
Defining data paths as constants is a good practice for maintainability. Ensure the directories exist or are created before writing files.
5-10: Check potential for large prompt content.
The extraction prompt is well-defined but could become quite large. Confirm that your logic safeguards against accidental oversized requests or content injection.
12-21: Clause matching prompt.
The placeholder-based approach (e.g. {clause_text}, {guideline_text}) is fine. Just verify that fields injected into this template are properly sanitized to avoid unexpected parsing issues.
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/components/workflow/report.py (1)
7-48: Prevent potential null reference on ReportState.result
When referencing properties like ReportState.result.vendor_name, ensure that ReportState.result is not None to avoid runtime errors. Consider adding a defensive check or guaranteeing the shape of this state in your data model.
e2e/shared/reflex_template.spec.ts (1)
17-23: Validate port availability before test runs
Randomly selected ports could be in use. Consider verifying port availability to prevent collisions or failed tests in CI/CD environments.
helpers/types.ts (1)
26-27: Consistent naming
Including "reflex" in TemplateType is clear. Ensure consistent naming in other modules or documentation so users can quickly map the purpose of each template type.
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/states/app.py (1)
57-87: Ensure streamed events are fully consumed
Within the trigger_workflow method, the async generator is polled properly, but consider adding a final completion step if the workflow emits a terminal event. This helps confirm that the entire workflow has finished processing.
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/models.py (3)
6-28: Ensure correct usage of Pydantic field descriptions.
These fields are well-structured and documented with meaningful descriptions. This is good for maintainability and transparency. Make sure they remain updated if contract requirements evolve.
30-42: Good optional fields for contract metadata.
The optional fields for vendor name, effective date, and governing law provide flexibility in capturing varying contract data. Confirm that downstream logic handles these optional fields gracefully.
59-73: Consider consistent naming for ClauseComplianceCheck.
Everything looks consistent, but double-check whether all references across the codebase use “ClauseComplianceCheck” for partial or final compliance checks.
helpers/datasources.ts (3)
21-21: Filename property introduced to Apple 10K SEC file.
This is consistent with the existing pattern for naming. No further change needed.
30-30: Filename property for Tesla 10K is consistent.
Again, aligns well with the multi-file approach. No issues found.
35-43: New EXAMPLE_GDPR data source.
This addition follows the same pattern as the other example sources. The filename property ensures the downloaded file is named clearly.
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/components/workflow/guideline.py (1)
10-43: Validate rendering logic in guideline_handler_component.
Pay attention to the hover_card structure. If the array item does not match the expected [id, status] shape, an error might occur. Consider robust error handling or a type-check to avoid runtime issues.
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/states/workflow.py (2)
11-41: Check concurrency for parallel loader events.
If multiple logs come in simultaneously, ensure the state transitions (start/stop) don’t conflict. Reflex typically handles event queues well, but concurrency edge cases may arise.
75-80: GuidelineData clarity.
The is_completed and is_compliant booleans are straightforward, but be sure external code is aware that is_compliant can be None when not yet determined.
e2e/utils.ts (1)
116-116: Add a thorough test for the “reflex” template inclusion.
The new condition includes “reflex.” Please confirm that passing the “agents” parameter is fully tested (e.g., ensuring that multiagent logic remains intact). Consider writing additional e2e tests to guarantee proper behavior in multi-agent scenarios.
questions/simple.ts (4)
2-5: Importing EXAMPLE_GDPR is consistent with new functionality.
The new import for EXAMPLE_GDPR aligns with the contract review use case below. Everything looks good here.
19-19: AppType update to include "contract_review"
This extension of the union type is consistent with the new contract review functionality.
50-50: Added "Contract Review" prompt choice
Nice addition to the prompt. The new menu entry is straightforward and consistent with the app type changes.
175-176: Use "reflex" template for extractor
Mapping the "extractor" agent to the "reflex" template is consistent with the refactoring across this PR.
helpers/index.ts (1)
196-196: Ensure "reflex" template is included
Handling "reflex" here is aligned with the updated codebase references. This appears consistent with the overall shift from “extractor” to “reflex” templates.
index.ts (1)
218-218: Revisit forced “useLlamaParse = false” for reflex
Currently, if the template is "reflex," parsing is disabled. Verify that this aligns with user expectations. If “reflex” eventually benefits from LlamaParse, you may want more granular logic or a separate CLI flag to re-enable the parse feature.
questions/questions.ts (1)
98-99: Validate framework selection for 'reflex' template.
You've restricted the 'reflex' template to FastAPI and empties out data sources. Verify that you also gracefully handle attempts to select other frameworks or data sources that are incompatible with 'reflex.'
helpers/python.ts (1)
408-409: Reflex template path loading appears correct.
Loading the reflex template path aligns with your new "reflex" option. This is a straightforward addition.
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/states/app.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/pages/index.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/states/app.py (2)
19-22: Add class documentationConsider adding a docstring to describe the purpose and attributes of the
UploadedFileclass.class UploadedFile(rx.Base): + """ + Represents an uploaded file with its metadata. + + Attributes: + file_name (str): Name of the uploaded file + size (int): Size of the file in bytes + """ file_name: str size: int
73-91: Consider adding progress trackingThe workflow processing could benefit from progress tracking to provide better user feedback.
try: workflow = get_workflow() + total_steps = len(Step) + current_step = 0 handler = workflow.run( contract_path=uploaded_file_path, ) async for event in handler.stream_events(): if isinstance(event, LogEvent): + current_step += 1 + yield rx.set_value("progress", current_step / total_steps * 100) match event.step:
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
helpers/python.ts(2 hunks)questions/simple.ts(5 hunks)templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/pages/index.py(1 hunks)templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/states/app.py(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/pages/index.py
- helpers/python.ts
- questions/simple.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/states/app.py (1)
Pattern templates/**: For files under the templates folder, do not report 'Missing Dependencies Detected' errors.
🔇 Additional comments (1)
templates/components/reflex/contract_review/app/ui/states/app.py (1)
1-17: LGTM! Clean import organization and proper logger setup.
The imports are well-organized with standard library imports separated from third-party imports, and the logger is properly initialized.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores
pyproject.tomlfor project dependencies and configuration.