-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add policy for determining Project Director substitutes #72
Add policy for determining Project Director substitutes #72
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Ryan Levick <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Levick <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Levick <[email protected]>
@rfcbot fcp merge I'm going to check boxes from #61 (comment), assuming everyone is fine with the minor updates that have been made. |
Team member @ehuss has proposed to merge this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged team members: No concerns currently listed. Once a majority of reviewers approve (and at most 2 approvals are outstanding), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up! See this document for info about what commands tagged team members can give me. |
🔔 This is now entering its final comment period, as per the review above. 🔔 |
The final comment period, with a disposition to merge, as per the review above, is now complete. As the automated representative of the governance process, I would like to thank the author for their work and everyone else who contributed. This will be merged soon. |
This solves an ambiguity about what to do when a Project Director cannot make a Foundation Board meeting. Instead of there being UB where in practice the PD in question decided on their own, this document lies out a simple procedure for choosing a sub.
Supersedes #61
@ehuss can you kick off the review process again and check off those who have already given their checkmark?