Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update eslint (main) #3207

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 19, 2024
Merged

chore(deps): update eslint (main) #3207

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 19, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Nov 16, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin (source) 8.14.0 -> 8.15.0 age adoption passing confidence
@typescript-eslint/parser (source) 8.14.0 -> 8.15.0 age adoption passing confidence
eslint (source) 9.14.0 -> 9.15.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin)

v8.15.0

Compare Source

🚀 Features
  • eslint-plugin: [prefer-nullish-coalescing] fix detection of ignoreConditionalTests involving boolean ! operator (#​10299)
  • eslint-plugin: new rule no-unsafe-type-assertion (#​10051)
  • eslint-plugin: added related-getter-setter-pairs rule (#​10192)
🩹 Fixes
  • utils: add defaultOptions to meta in rule (#​10339)
  • eslint-plugin: report deprecations used in default export (#​10330)
  • eslint-plugin: [explicit-module-boundary-types] and [explicit-function-return-type] don't report on as const satisfies (#​10315)
  • eslint-plugin: [await-thenable, return-await] don't flag awaiting unconstrained type parameter as unnecessary (#​10314)
  • eslint-plugin: [consistent-indexed-object-style] handle circular mapped types (#​10301)
❤️ Thank You

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/parser)

v8.15.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

eslint/eslint (eslint)

v9.15.0

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented Nov 16, 2024

Branch automerge failure

This PR was configured for branch automerge. However, this is not possible, so it has been raised as a PR instead.


  • Branch has one or more failed status checks

@github-actions github-actions bot added the pr: peer review required A peer review is required for this pull request label Nov 16, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/main-eslint branch 2 times, most recently from f5ccb5d to 076098e Compare November 18, 2024 04:50
@jeripeierSBB
Copy link
Contributor

Should be fixed with next typescript-eslint release: typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10338

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/main-eslint branch 4 times, most recently from 1a13eb9 to bd31da2 Compare November 18, 2024 20:01
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency eslint to v9.15.0 (main) chore(deps): update eslint (main) Nov 18, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/main-eslint branch from bd31da2 to 08ee1c0 Compare November 18, 2024 21:07
@jeripeierSBB jeripeierSBB merged commit 212992e into main Nov 19, 2024
15 of 16 checks passed
@jeripeierSBB jeripeierSBB deleted the renovate/main-eslint branch November 19, 2024 07:55
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the pr: peer review required A peer review is required for this pull request label Nov 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant