Fix #271 #272
Fix #271 #272
Conversation
Signed-off-by: [email protected] <[email protected]>
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant ImageHandler
participant ImageDraw
User->>ImageHandler: Request image processing
ImageHandler->>ImageHandler: async_get_image_from_json()
ImageHandler->>ImageHandler: Handle errors
ImageHandler->>ImageHandler: async_map_coordinates_offset()
ImageHandler->>ImageDraw: Draw robot on map
ImageDraw->>ImageDraw: async_draw_robot_on_map()
ImageDraw->>User: Return processed image
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/valetudo/hypfer/image_handler.py (2)
Line range hint
315-321: Yo, heads up! The error handling needs a quick fix! 🔧The current exception handling syntax won't catch
RuntimeWarningas intended. In Python, you can't useorin except clauses.Here's the fix:
- except RuntimeError or RuntimeWarning as e: + except (RuntimeError, RuntimeWarning) as e: _LOGGER.warning( f"{self.file_name}: Error {e} during image creation.", exc_info=True, ) return None
Line range hint
419-445: The new coordinate offset method is rad, but could use some polish! 🏄♂️The method handles various aspect ratios nicely, but could benefit from a few enhancements:
- Input validation for negative values
- More detailed docstring about return values
- Consider using an enum for aspect ratios
Here's a suggested improvement:
async def async_map_coordinates_offset( self, wsf: int, hsf: int, width: int, height: int ) -> tuple[int, int]: """ Offset the coordinates to the map. :param wsf: Width scale factor. :param hsf: Height scale factor. :param width: Width of the image. :param height: Height of the image. + :return: A tuple containing the adjusted (width, height) values + :raises ValueError: If any input parameters are negative """ + if any(x < 0 for x in (wsf, hsf, width, height)): + raise ValueError("All parameters must be positive integers") if wsf == 1 and hsf == 1: self.imu.set_image_offset_ratio_1_1(width, height)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/manifest.json(1 hunks)custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/valetudo/hypfer/image_handler.py(1 hunks)custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/valetudo/rand256/reimg_draw.py(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/valetudo/rand256/reimg_draw.py
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/manifest.json
🔇 Additional comments (1)
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/valetudo/hypfer/image_handler.py (1)
244-244: Sweet! Parameter cleanup looks good! 🎯
The simplified parameter list for the robot drawing function matches the PR objective of removing the unnecessary parameter. The essential parameters (position, angle, fill color) are preserved.
Let's double-check if the removed parameter was used elsewhere:
✅ Verification successful
Yo, that parameter cleanup is totally legit! 🎯
The removed parameter from the robot drawing function is safe. The overlay_robot method in drawable.py only uses basic positioning parameters (x, y) to place the robot image, which aligns perfectly with our simplified parameter list. No other usages found that would expect the removed parameter.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other robot drawing calls that might expect the removed parameter
rg -l "robot\(" | xargs rg "robot\([^)]*\)"
Length of output: 165
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation of overlay_robot to understand its usage
ast-grep --pattern 'def overlay_robot($$$)'
Length of output: 45
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation using ripgrep for better context
rg -A 5 "overlay_robot" custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/utils/drawable.py
Length of output: 481
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/valetudo/hypfer/image_handler.py (3)
378-379: Docstring could use some love 📚The docstring would be more helpful with example usage and return value examples.
Add examples to the docstring:
""" Offset the coordinates to the map. :param wsf: Width scale factor. :param hsf: Height scale factor. :param width: Width of the image. :param height: Height of the image. :return: A tuple containing the adjusted (width, height) values :raises ValueError: If any input parameters are negative + + Example: + >>> async_map_coordinates_offset(16, 9, 1920, 1080) + (1920, 1080) """
382-384: Input validation could be more specific 🎯The validation could be more helpful by checking each parameter individually.
Consider this more detailed validation:
- if any(x < 0 for x in (wsf, hsf, width, height)): - raise ValueError("All parameters must be positive integers") + if wsf < 0: + raise ValueError("Width scale factor must be positive") + if hsf < 0: + raise ValueError("Height scale factor must be positive") + if width < 0: + raise ValueError("Width must be positive") + if height < 0: + raise ValueError("Height must be positive")
Line range hint
385-396: Add debug logging for ratio selection 🔍It would be helpful to log which aspect ratio was selected for debugging purposes.
Add logging before each ratio handler:
if wsf == 1 and hsf == 1: + _LOGGER.debug(f"{self.file_name}: Using 1:1 aspect ratio") self.imu.set_image_offset_ratio_1_1(width, height) elif wsf == 2 and hsf == 1: + _LOGGER.debug(f"{self.file_name}: Using 2:1 aspect ratio") self.imu.set_image_offset_ratio_2_1(width, height)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/valetudo/hypfer/image_handler.py(4 hunks)custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/valetudo/rand256/reimg_draw.py(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/valetudo/rand256/reimg_draw.py
🔇 Additional comments (2)
custom_components/mqtt_vacuum_camera/valetudo/hypfer/image_handler.py (2)
244-244: LGTM! Parameter formatting fixed 🎯
The comma addition after the fill parameter properly formats the parameter list for the robot drawing function.
301-301: Sweet error handling upgrade! 🚀
Properly separating RuntimeError and RuntimeWarning exceptions makes error tracking much cleaner and more precise.
Missing parameter in DrawRobot, removed from reimg_draw.py
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
mqtt_vacuum_cameracomponent to 2024.11.1.Bug Fixes
Documentation