Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix MongoClientInterface.getBucketInfos to ignore views #326

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 4, 2024

Conversation

francoisferrand
Copy link
Contributor

  • Ensure getBucketInfos acces only mongo collections
  • add debug ssh runner
  • Bump arsenal 8.1.137

Issue: S3UTILS-178

This is especially needed after PRA bootstrap was executed, as we
started using views in that context.

Issue: S3UTILS-178
Issue: SUTILS-178
@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Oct 3, 2024

Hello francoisferrand,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options
name description privileged authored
/after_pull_request Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval Bypass the pull request author's approval
/bypass_build_status Bypass the build and test status
/bypass_commit_size Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA
/bypass_incompatible_branch Bypass the check on the source branch prefix
/bypass_jira_check Bypass the Jira issue check
/bypass_peer_approval Bypass the pull request peers' approval
/bypass_leader_approval Bypass the pull request leaders' approval
/approve Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request. ✍️
/create_pull_requests Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.
Available commands
name description privileged
/help Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request TBA
/clear Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Oct 3, 2024
@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Oct 3, 2024

Request integration branches

Waiting for integration branch creation to be requested by the user.

To request integration branches, please comment on this pull request with the following command:

/create_integration_branches

Alternatively, the /approve and /create_pull_requests commands will automatically
create the integration branches.

Copy link
Contributor

@williamlardier williamlardier left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe we want to release a new version of s3utils with this fix (so, need to bump package version)?

@francoisferrand
Copy link
Contributor Author

/approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Oct 4, 2024

I have successfully merged the changeset of this pull request
into targetted development branches:

  • ✔️ development/1.14

  • ✔️ development/1.15

The following branches have NOT changed:

  • development/1.13
  • development/1.4

Please check the status of the associated issue S3UTILS-178.

Goodbye francoisferrand.

The following options are set: approve

@bert-e bert-e merged commit 3bf8eca into development/1.14 Oct 4, 2024
11 checks passed
@bert-e bert-e deleted the bugfix/S3UTILS-178 branch October 4, 2024 17:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants