-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add mechanism for setting sample and detector bank offset in Zoom workflow #59
Changes from 5 commits
12f6b8d
50d8ea0
eed11ca
9cfd078
b1e2664
bbcdd80
d47ad6d
775b0cd
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ | ||
# SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause | ||
# Copyright (c) 2024 Scipp contributors (https://github.com/scipp) | ||
from typing import NewType | ||
|
||
import sciline | ||
import scipp as sc | ||
|
||
from ..types import RawData, RunType | ||
|
||
PixelMask = NewType('PixelMask', sc.Variable) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This is also defined in
SimonHeybrock marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
|
||
|
||
class ConfiguredRawData(sciline.Scope[RunType, sc.DataArray], sc.DataArray): | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I'm not sure about the name. Immediately it wasn't very clear what it was meant to represent. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Do you have a suggestion? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Should we also rename the provider? I guess |
||
"""Raw data with applied user configuration for component positions.""" | ||
|
||
|
||
SampleOffset = NewType('SampleOffset', sc.Variable) | ||
DetectorBankOffset = NewType('DetectorBankOffset', sc.Variable) | ||
|
||
|
||
def configure_raw_data( | ||
data: RawData[RunType], | ||
sample_offset: SampleOffset, | ||
detector_bank_offset: DetectorBankOffset, | ||
) -> ConfiguredRawData[RunType]: | ||
"""Apply user configuration to raw data. | ||
|
||
Parameters | ||
---------- | ||
data: | ||
Raw data. | ||
sample_offset: | ||
Sample offset. | ||
detector_bank_offset: | ||
Detector bank offset. | ||
""" | ||
data = data.copy(deep=False) | ||
sample_pos = data.coords['sample_position'] | ||
data.coords['sample_position'] = sample_pos + sample_offset.to( | ||
unit=sample_pos.unit, copy=False | ||
) | ||
pos = data.coords['position'] | ||
data.coords['position'] = pos + detector_bank_offset.to(unit=pos.unit, copy=False) | ||
return ConfiguredRawData[RunType](data) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are these mostly required because of the IDF mechanism in Mantid/ISIS?
Will the situation be better at ESS with the nexus geometry, or are we expecting the geometry in the files to not be updated for every experiment and often be out of date?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think ECDC wants to keep files up to date, but if that will be actually true in practice...