fix[chat_bubble]: always place bubble at the end of the sentence #38
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@ArslanSaleem has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 20 minutes and 34 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request introduce enhancements to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## release/v0.3.1 #38 +/- ##
==================================================
+ Coverage 57.15% 60.10% +2.95%
==================================================
Files 37 37
Lines 1706 1717 +11
==================================================
+ Hits 975 1032 +57
+ Misses 731 685 -46 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
backend/tests/utils/test_sentence_endings.py (1)
7-36: Consider adding tests for additional edge cases.The current test suite provides good coverage of basic scenarios. Consider enhancing it with the following cases:
- Multiple consecutive punctuation (e.g., "Really...!")
- Special characters or quotes (e.g., "He said "Hello." Then left.")
- Unicode punctuation marks (e.g., "Hello。World")
- Numbers with periods (e.g., "Version 1.2 released.")
Would you like me to help implement these additional test cases?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- backend/app/api/v1/chat.py (4 hunks)
- backend/app/utils.py (1 hunks)
- backend/tests/utils/test_following_sentence_ending.py (1 hunks)
- backend/tests/utils/test_sentence_endings.py (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
backend/tests/utils/test_sentence_endings.py (2)
1-6: LGTM! Clean imports and class declaration.The imports are minimal and the class name clearly describes its purpose.
37-39: LGTM! Standard test runner setup.The test runner setup follows the standard Python testing pattern.
backend/tests/utils/test_following_sentence_ending.py (3)
1-6: LGTM! Well-structured test file setup.The imports are minimal and appropriate, and the class structure follows unittest best practices.
43-45: LGTM! Standard test runner implementation.The test runner section follows the standard Python pattern for test execution.
1-45: Verify test discovery and execution.Given the coverage issues mentioned in the PR objectives, let's ensure this test file is properly discovered and executed during test runs.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can now generate the final response:
Test file is properly discoverable and uniquely testing the functionality
The verification shows that:
- The test file is in the correct discoverable location at
backend/tests/utils/test_following_sentence_ending.py- The import path
from app.utils import find_following_sentence_endingis correctly structured- This is the only test file testing the
find_following_sentence_endingfunction, avoiding any duplicate test coverage🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify test discovery and potential naming issues # Check if the test file is in a discoverable location fd -g "*test_*.py" -d 3 backend/tests # Verify proper import paths rg -l "from app.utils import find_following_sentence_ending" backend/tests # Check for any other test files that might be testing the same function rg -l "find_following_sentence_ending" backend/testsLength of output: 1127
backend/app/utils.py (1)
64-65: LGTM: Proper spacing between functionsThe added empty lines follow PEP 8 style guidelines for spacing between top-level functions.
backend/app/api/v1/chat.py (5)
14-14: LGTM: Import changes align with new functionality.The addition of
find_following_sentence_endingandfind_sentence_endingsimports is consistent with the PR's objective to improve chat bubble placement.
97-97: LGTM: Proper sentence tracking implementation.The addition of
context_sentence_endingsprovides proper sentence boundary tracking, which is essential for accurate chat bubble placement.
139-139: LGTM: Proper reference boundary update.The use of
reference_ending_indexensures chat bubbles align with sentence endings, fulfilling the PR's objective.
125-130: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionVerify reference position calculation and add validation.
While the logic for finding reference positions is improved, consider adding validation:
- Ensure
indexis valid before calculatingreference_ending_index- Handle cases where no sentence ending is found
Let's verify the error handling coverage:
#!/bin/bash # Check for error handling patterns around sentence ending calculations rg -A 2 "find_following_sentence_ending" | grep -E "try|if|raise"Consider adding validation:
index = clean_content.find(clean_text(sentence)) +if index == -1: + logger.warning(f"Reference sentence not found in content: {sentence}") + continue + # Find the following sentence end from the end index reference_ending_index = find_following_sentence_ending(context_sentence_endings, index + len(sentence)) +if reference_ending_index is None: + logger.warning(f"No sentence ending found after index {index}") + reference_ending_index = len(clean_content)
Line range hint
125-139: Improve test coverage for reference handling.The Codecov report indicates 4 uncovered lines in this file. Consider adding test cases for:
- Scenarios where reference sentences aren't found in content
- Cases where no sentence endings are found
- Edge cases with empty or malformed content
Let's identify the specific uncovered lines:
Would you like help creating additional test cases to improve coverage?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
backend/app/utils.py (2)
2-2: Remove unnecessary blank lines between imports.The imports should be grouped together without extra blank lines.
from typing import List from urllib.parse import urlparse import uuid import requests import re import string - from bisect import bisect_right -Also applies to: 9-10
78-90: Enhance docstring with error scenarios.While the docstring is well-structured, it should document potential error scenarios and edge cases. Consider adding a "Raises" section to document expected exceptions.
""" Find the closest sentence ending that follows the given index. Args: sentence_endings: Sorted list of sentence ending positions index: Current position in text Returns: Next sentence ending position or original index if none found + + Raises: + IndexError: If sentence_endings list is empty + TypeError: If inputs are not of expected types """
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- backend/app/utils.py (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
backend/app/utils.py (1)
69-76: Previous review comments are still applicable.The suggestions from the previous review about enhancing sentence ending detection robustness and adding input validation remain valid.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
backend/tests/api/v1/test_chat.py (1)
303-416: LGTM! Comprehensive test suite with well-structured test cases.The test cases follow best practices:
- Clear AAA (Arrange-Act-Assert) pattern
- Proper mock configuration
- Comprehensive assertions
- Good documentation
Consider adding these test cases for better coverage:
def test_chat_endpoint_invalid_conversation_id(...): chat_request = { "query": "Test query", "conversation_id": "invalid_id" } # Test handling of invalid conversation_id def test_chat_endpoint_empty_query(...): chat_request = { "query": "", "conversation_id": None } # Test handling of empty query def test_chat_endpoint_query_length_limit(...): chat_request = { "query": "x" * 1001, # Assuming 1000 char limit "conversation_id": None } # Test handling of query exceeding length limit
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- backend/tests/api/v1/test_chat.py (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
backend/tests/api/v1/test_chat.py (2)
18-18: LGTM! Import path update aligns with the refactoring.The mock_vectorstore fixture correctly updates the import path to match the new module structure.
28-41: LGTM! Well-structured fixtures following testing best practices.The new fixtures are:
- Focused and follow single responsibility principle
- Correctly use patch decorator with specific paths
- Provide necessary mocks for testing chat endpoint functionality
* fix[chat_bubble]: always place bubble at the end of the sentence * fix[chat_bubble]: remove extra print statements * fix[chat_bubble]: refactor code to optimum aglo for finding index * fix(chat_bubble): adding test cases for chat method * fix(chat_bubble): adding test cases for chat method * fix(chat_bubble): adding test cases for chat method
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests