Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TST: Fix devdeps failures #2170

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 28, 2023
Merged

TST: Fix devdeps failures #2170

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 28, 2023

Conversation

pllim
Copy link
Contributor

@pllim pllim commented Apr 27, 2023

Description

This pull request is to:

Change log entry

  • Is a change log needed? If yes, is it added to CHANGES.rst? If you want to avoid merge conflicts,
    list the proposed change log here for review and add to CHANGES.rst before merge. If no, maintainer
    should add a no-changelog-entry-needed label.

Checklist for package maintainer(s)

This checklist is meant to remind the package maintainer(s) who will review this pull request of some common things to look for. This list is not exhaustive.

  • Are two approvals required? Branch protection rule does not check for the second approval. If a second approval is not necessary, please apply the trivial label.
  • Do the proposed changes actually accomplish desired goals? Also manually run the affected example notebooks, if necessary.
  • Do the proposed changes follow the STScI Style Guides?
  • Are tests added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the STScI Style Guides?
  • Are docs added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the STScI Style Guides?
  • Did the CI pass? If not, are the failures related?
  • Is a milestone set? Set this to bugfix milestone if this is a bug fix and needs to be released ASAP; otherwise, set this to the next major release milestone.
  • After merge, any internal documentations need updating (e.g., JIRA, Innerspace)?

@pllim pllim added testing trivial Only needs one approval instead of two no-changelog-entry-needed changelog bot directive labels Apr 27, 2023
@pllim pllim added this to the 3.5 milestone Apr 27, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added the imviz label Apr 27, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 27, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 75.00% and project coverage change: -0.01 ⚠️

Comparison is base (2953dec) 91.50% compared to head (0c513d4) 91.49%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2170      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.50%   91.49%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         147      147              
  Lines       16142    16149       +7     
==========================================
+ Hits        14771    14776       +5     
- Misses       1371     1373       +2     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
jdaviz/configs/imviz/tests/test_regions.py 98.78% <75.00%> (-1.22%) ⬇️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@@ -50,7 +50,8 @@ deps =
devdeps: git+https://github.com/spacetelescope/gwcs.git
devdeps: git+https://github.com/asdf-format/asdf.git
devdeps: git+https://github.com/astropy/asdf-astropy.git
devdeps: git+https://github.com/spacetelescope/stdatamodels.git
# FIXME: https://github.com/spacetelescope/stdatamodels/issues/159
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is tracked by #2165 on our end, right?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, but the canonical issue is upstream.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just wanted to make sure we had a reminder to remove it - thanks!

@kecnry kecnry merged commit 430464f into spacetelescope:main Apr 28, 2023
@pllim pllim deleted the fix-devdeps branch April 28, 2023 13:49
@pllim
Copy link
Contributor Author

pllim commented Apr 28, 2023

Probably should backport.

@meeseeksdev backport to v3.4.x

meeseeksmachine pushed a commit to meeseeksmachine/jdaviz that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2023
@pllim pllim modified the milestones: 3.5, 3.4.1 Apr 28, 2023
@pllim pllim added the 💤backport-v3.4.x on-merge: backport to v3.4.x label Apr 28, 2023
pllim added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2023
…0-on-v3.4.x

Backport PR #2170 on branch v3.4.x (TST: Fix devdeps failures)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
imviz no-changelog-entry-needed changelog bot directive testing trivial Only needs one approval instead of two 💤backport-v3.4.x on-merge: backport to v3.4.x
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants