Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement a single-bucket design. #186

Merged
merged 49 commits into from
May 5, 2024
Merged

Implement a single-bucket design. #186

merged 49 commits into from
May 5, 2024

Conversation

mcopik
Copy link
Collaborator

@mcopik mcopik commented Oct 18, 2023

This PR resolves the issue #185. We have used too many buckets, creating issues on systems such as AWS with a hard limit of 100 buckets per account. In this design, a single SeBS deployment will only create up to three buckets: one for all benchmarks, one for code deployment, and one for experiments. On systems like Azure, we still use separate storage accounts for performance reasons.

… handling of storage buckets.

In future, we are going to use max 3 buckets per deployment (benchmarks, code, deployment).

Warning: this has not been tested and evaluated on Azure, GCP, OpenWhisk and local - only AWS
…ric and implement storage function looking for existing deployments
@mcopik mcopik merged commit fb67f03 into master May 5, 2024
1 check passed
@mcopik
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mcopik commented May 5, 2024

This feature is finally finished - we moved to a single-bucket design on all platforms. Tested and validated on AWS, Azure, GCP, and OpenWhisk.

Closes #185 and #195

@mcopik mcopik deleted the feature/single-bucket branch June 14, 2024 16:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant