-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 239
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
introduce ForkedBlobSidecar
for EIP-7688 Electra period before PeerDAS
#6451
Draft
etan-status
wants to merge
20
commits into
unstable
Choose a base branch
from
dev/etan/df-forkedblobs
base: unstable
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
On `ELECTRA_FORK_EPOCH`, PeerDAS is not yet activated, hence the current mechanism based on `BlobSidecar` is still in use. With EIP-7688, the generalized indices of `BeaconBlockBody` get reindexed, changing the length of the inclusion proof within the `BlobSidecar`. Because network Req/Resp operations allow responses across fork boundaries, this creates the need for a `ForkedBlobSidecar` in that layer, same as already done for `ForkedSignedBeaconBock` for similar reasons. Note: This PR is only needed if PeerDAS is adopted _after_ EIP-7688. If PeerDAS is adopted _before_ EIP-7688, a similar PR may be needed for forked columns. Coincidental `Forked` jank can only be fully avoided if both features activate at the same epoch, actual changes to blobs aside. Delaying EIP-7688 for sole purpose of epoch alignemnt is not worth it.
etan-status
force-pushed
the
dev/etan/df-forkedblobs
branch
from
July 25, 2024 16:54
3a403ba
to
d028bae
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
On
ELECTRA_FORK_EPOCH
, PeerDAS is not yet activated, hence the current mechanism based onBlobSidecar
is still in use. With EIP-7688, the generalized indices ofBeaconBlockBody
get reindexed, changing the length of the inclusion proof within theBlobSidecar
. Because network Req/Resp operations allow responses across fork boundaries, this creates the need for aForkedBlobSidecar
in that layer, same as already done forForkedSignedBeaconBock
for similar reasons.Note: This PR is only needed if PeerDAS is adopted after EIP-7688. If PeerDAS is adopted before EIP-7688, a similar PR may be needed for forked columns. Coincidental
Forked
jank can only be fully avoided if both features activate at the same epoch, actual changes to blobs aside. Delaying EIP-7688 for sole purpose of epoch alignemnt is not worth it.