Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve Grammar and Clarity in Code Comments #174

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Daulox92
Copy link

File: contracts/hooks/LockLicensesHook.sol
Old: who calling → New: who is calling
Reason: Added "is" for grammatical correctness.
Old: who receive → New: who receives
Reason: Changed to ensure subject-verb agreement.

File: contracts/interfaces/modules/tokenizer/IOwnableERC20.sol
Old: to whom → New: to which
Reason: Corrected usage for referring to a token.

File: contracts/interfaces/workflows/IGroupingWorkflows.sol
Old: must be have → New: must have to
Reason: Fixed grammatical accuracy.

@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ interface IGroupingWorkflows {

/// @notice Register a group IP with a group reward pool, attach license terms to the group IP,
/// and add individual IPs to the group IP.
/// @dev ipIds must be have the same license terms as the group IP.
/// @dev ipIds must have to the same license terms as the group IP.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should be "must have", we can remove the "to" here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants