chore(test): migrate wasm ibc to cw_ibc_example from reflect_send #1131
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 1 Ignored Deployment
|
Reecepbcups
reviewed
May 13, 2024
Reecepbcups
changed the title
Reecepbcups
approved these changes
May 13, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Spoke to Reece about the difficulties in getting the wasm ibc test to pass and we agreed it would be sensible to use the
cw-ibc-examplecontract to test wasm ibc as it's more straight forward and more up to date.Additionally I added a helper for querying the ContractInfo from a chain so that we can get the wasm ports directly instead of assuming the implementation detail of how portIds are constructed.
https://github.com/0xekez/cw-ibc-example
resolves: #998