Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test(auth): increase code coverage #648

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 28, 2025

Conversation

grdsdev
Copy link
Collaborator

@grdsdev grdsdev commented Jan 24, 2025

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...

What is the current behavior?

Please link any relevant issues here.

What is the new behavior?

Feel free to include screenshots if it includes visual changes.

Additional context

Add any other context or screenshots.

Base automatically changed from guilherme/increase-code-coverage-functions to main January 27, 2025 08:39
@grdsdev grdsdev force-pushed the guilherme/auth/increase-code-coverage branch from d074b7d to 92dbbc2 Compare January 27, 2025 10:49
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jan 27, 2025

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 12995358684

Details

  • 16 of 17 (94.12%) changed or added relevant lines in 3 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+2.8%) to 52.465%

Changes Missing Coverage Covered Lines Changed/Added Lines %
Sources/Auth/Internal/PKCE.swift 12 13 92.31%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 12985033913: 2.8%
Covered Lines: 4448
Relevant Lines: 8478

💛 - Coveralls

@grdsdev grdsdev marked this pull request as ready for review January 27, 2025 12:40
@grdsdev grdsdev requested a review from dshukertjr January 27, 2025 18:09
@grdsdev grdsdev merged commit faf78f6 into main Jan 28, 2025
20 checks passed
@grdsdev grdsdev deleted the guilherme/auth/increase-code-coverage branch January 28, 2025 08:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants