Benchmarks

[daemontus]

Proposes several benchmark problems which we can use to compare with PyEDA.

Also adds some minimum viable bindings for Bdd to implement these benchmarks.

(the history is a bit messed up because it initially branched off feat/bdd, but the actually relevant things should be contained in the benchmarks folder)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 17.33333% with 62 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 81.81%. Comparing base (a3f9b1e) to head (e82fcbf).

❗ Current head e82fcbf differs from pull request most recent head 1f3a54e

Please upload reports for the commit 1f3a54e to get more accurate results.

Files	Patch %	Lines
src/bindings/bdd.rs	0.00%	27 Missing ⚠️
src/bdd/mod.rs	0.00%	12 Missing ⚠️
src/bindings/table.rs	0.00%	11 Missing ⚠️
src/bdd/traits/bit/not.rs	0.00%	4 Missing ⚠️
src/bdd/traits/bit/and.rs	50.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
src/bdd/traits/bit/or.rs	50.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
src/bdd/traits/bit/xor.rs	50.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
src/bindings/expression.rs	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
src/bindings/mod.rs	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #28      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   86.34%   81.81%   -4.54%     
==========================================
  Files          83       85       +2     
  Lines        1282     1353      +71     
==========================================
  Hits         1107     1107              
- Misses        175      246      +71     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[AurumTheEnd]

@daemontus I further resolved the conflicting two commits (feat(tests): bdd.domain and Fix failed rebase) by squashing them, effectively canceling their code changes.

Will merge this after the pipeline.