-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New algorithm inspired by original code with inline comments in fields #29
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Dmitry Makarov <[email protected]>
Wow. That's huge:) |
I tested new and old algorithms on examples below: Example 1
Output 1
Example 2
Output 2
|
update version to 1.2.2
… in multiline nodes
@t3rn0 Hello, I think kapulkin has made the requested changes. Maybe you could re-review this PR? Thank you! |
Yes, I made an update with parsing bug fix. @margual56, thank you for pointing about the update. |
I believe it's still missing actual executable test cases in Also, since this proposal breaks the API of the library I think it should at least comes with the appropriate changes to the README.md file explaining the changes. |
Sorry for such a late response. |
@t3rn0 thank you for the review. You are right about _Unparser, this is part of outdated code, I will remove it. Indeed the code had also a few issues. During intensive code usage I found them and fixed few month ago on my machine. I updated the pull request now. Sorry for late update. I agree, that future work on tests is needed to complete pull-request. Any hep here is appreciated. I will try to add tests from my side too. |
Issue #13 fix