Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(kit): fix parallel lazy loading tree nodes #9937

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

LeonidSimakov
Copy link
Contributor

The node loading engine should not cancel the previous request, because these requests are for different nodes. If switchMap cancels a request, then the loading for the cancelled node is always running.

https://t.me/taiga_ui/7924/25725

The node loading engine should not cancel the previous request, because these requests are for different nodes. If switchMap cancels a request, then the loading for the cancelled node is always running.
@LeonidSimakov LeonidSimakov requested a review from a team as a code owner December 8, 2024 18:32
@LeonidSimakov LeonidSimakov requested review from MarsiBarsi, waterplea, nsbarsukov, vladimirpotekhin and mdlufy and removed request for a team December 8, 2024 18:32
Copy link

lumberjack-bot bot commented Dec 8, 2024

Pull request was closed ✔️

All saved screenshots (for current PR) were deleted 🗑️

@LeonidSimakov LeonidSimakov closed this by deleting the head repository Dec 8, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 8, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (4a26b1a) to head (ebd87ec).
Report is 765 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #9937       +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   75.68%       0   -75.69%     
==========================================
  Files        1216       0     -1216     
  Lines       19068       0    -19068     
  Branches     2091       0     -2091     
==========================================
- Hits        14432       0    -14432     
+ Misses       4592       0     -4592     
+ Partials       44       0       -44     
Flag Coverage Δ
summary ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant