Add TARDIS Bot comments from TARDIS Repo

[smokestacklightnin]

📝 Description

Type: | 🎢 infrastructure

This includes TARDIS bot actions to leave comments for success or failure of the build-docs workflow.

📌 Resources

Original code

🚦 Testing

How did you test these changes?

• Not sure how to test this on my own branch

☑️ Checklist

• I requested two reviewers for this pull request
• I updated the documentation according to my changes
• I built the documentation by applying the build_docs label

[jvshields]

Can you describe what you've done to test if this workflow runs correctly? Does it just need to be merged before we can see if it works or are there any other things we could do to test it?

[smokestacklightnin]

Can you describe what you've done to test if this workflow runs correctly? Does it just need to be merged before we can see if it works or are there any other things we could do to test it?

I will see what I can do to test it. Apologies for not doing that beforehand.

[wkerzendorf]

I'm not quite sure why we need this? Could you add a bit more description?

[smokestacklightnin]

I'm not quite sure why we need this? Could you add a bit more description?

I don't have an opinion about whether it's necessary or not. I included it to match the TARDIS workflow.

[atharva-2001]

tardis bot token, right?
Is this saved as a secret?

[smokestacklightnin]

This line works in other workflows, although I don't know the direct answer to your question off the top of my head.

[atharva-2001]

I think we should use the BOT_TOKEN here. This also needs to be added in the repo settings.

[smokestacklightnin]

I think we should use the BOT_TOKEN here. This also needs to be added in the repo settings.

Is this what you had in mind?

[atharva-2001]

yes! thank you.

[smokestacklightnin]

I'm not quite sure why we need this? Could you add a bit more description?

Something very useful that this does is have the tardis bot comment with a URL to the version of the docs on the branch receiving the change

[review-notebook-app]

Check out this pull request on 

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.

---

Powered by ReviewNB

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (main@887d562). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head a31f414 differs from pull request most recent head 2933599. Consider uploading reports for the commit 2933599 to get more accurate results

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #80   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   33.89%           
=======================================
  Files           ?       17           
  Lines           ?      658           
  Branches        ?        0           
=======================================
  Hits            ?      223           
  Misses          ?      435           
  Partials        ?        0           

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more