Fix eslint #51
Open
Fix eslint #51
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Fix eslint on examples folder Removed custom eslint config on api-list split script to format code teaful/examples
aralroca
requested changes
Nov 25, 2021
aralroca
reviewed
Nov 25, 2021
Co-authored-by: Aral Roca Gomez <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix eslint on examples folder
Removed custom eslint config on api-list
split script to format code teaful/examples
What is the purpose of this pull request? (put an "X" next to item)
[ ] Documentation update
[x ] Bug fix
[ ] New feature
[ ] Other, please explain:
What changes did you make? (Give an overview)
split script to format code between teaful and examples folder
remove custom eslint rules on api-list example
Which issue (if any) does this pull request address?
error running format script due to custom eslint rules on example api-list
Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?