Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update crimes.md #140

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 29, 2024
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion psf/crimes.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ I'm confident that any reasonable person reading [the topic](https://discuss.pyt

You tell me. Does the CoC say anything about which good-faith topics can be discussed? About the extent to which they can be discussed? I make no apology for expressing what may be unpopular views, or for visibly opposing what I believe to be injustice, or attempts to evade accountability by those with corporate power. I'd say "so sue me", but "so ban me" may be more appropriate :wink:.

It occurred to me later that "excessive discussion" may be a violation of the Discourse [Community Guidelines](https://discuss.python.org/rules) promulgated during the pre-ban brouhaha. But, if so, that's not the CoC, and these were unambiguously sold as _being_ CoC violations.
It occurred to me later that "excessive discussion" may be a violation of the Discourse [Community Guidelines](https://discuss.python.org/rules) promulgated during the pre-ban brouhaha. But, if so, that's not the CoC, and these were unambiguously sold as _being_ CoC violations. Those guidlances were introduced after the byloaw topic concluded anyway.
tim-one marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

---
<a id="crimeSpec"></a>
Expand Down
Loading