-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 683
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(instrumentation): Add event-based tracking implementation across providers #2541
Open
onyedikachi-david
wants to merge
10
commits into
traceloop:main
Choose a base branch
from
onyedikachi-david:feat/2456-event-based-tracking-implementation
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
feat(instrumentation): Add event-based tracking implementation across providers #2541
onyedikachi-david
wants to merge
10
commits into
traceloop:main
from
onyedikachi-david:feat/2456-event-based-tracking-implementation
+7,869
−1,904
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…raceloop#2456) - Add event-based tracking support while maintaining legacy behavior - Implement use_legacy_attributes config parameter - Add event logger integration with proper trace context - Add streaming support with event buffering - Include comprehensive test coverage - Add sample app integration Part of the larger effort to support event-based tracking across all packages. Signed-off-by: David Anyatonwu <[email protected]>
…ventions Signed-off-by: David Anyatonwu <[email protected]>
dosubot
bot
added
the
size:XXL
This PR changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
label
Jan 22, 2025
21 tasks
@nirga Could i get a review, to confirm I am on the right track. Thanks. |
@onyedikachi-david can you rebase so we can run the CI? |
alright |
Done @nirga |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
🙋 Bounty claim
new instrumentation
size:XXL
This PR changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
testing
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
/claim #2456
Fixes: #2456
feat(instrumentation): ...
orfix(instrumentation): ...
.Description
This PR adds event-based tracking implementation across multiple providers while maintaining backward compatibility with the legacy attribute-based approach.
Completed Implementations:
Pending Implementations:
Key Changes:
use_legacy_attributes
supportEach provider implementation includes:
events.py
)config.py
)__init__.py
)test_events.py
)