Add implementation of subcell bounds check #1672
Merged
This check has been archived and is scheduled for deletion.
Learn more about checks retention
Codecov / codecov/project
succeeded
Oct 20, 2023 in 1s
87.21% (+0.73%) compared to bb60b5d
View this Pull Request on Codecov
87.21% (+0.73%) compared to bb60b5d
Details
Codecov Report
Attention: 84 lines
in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Comparison is base (
bb60b5d
) 86.47% compared to head (f4f4146
) 87.21%.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1672 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 86.47% 87.21% +0.73%
==========================================
Files 423 425 +2
Lines 34312 34379 +67
==========================================
+ Hits 29671 29981 +310
+ Misses 4641 4398 -243
Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
...ee_2d_dgsem/elixir_euler_shockcapturing_subcell.jl | 0.00% <ø> (-100.00%) |
⬇️ |
..._shock_bubble_shockcapturing_subcell_positivity.jl | 0.00% <ø> (-100.00%) |
⬇️ |
src/Trixi.jl | 43.48% <ø> (ø) |
|
src/solvers/dgsem_tree/subcell_limiters.jl | 29.41% <0.00%> (-55.88%) |
⬇️ |
src/solvers/dgsem_tree/subcell_limiters_2d.jl | 0.00% <0.00%> (-94.34%) |
⬇️ |
src/callbacks_stage/subcell_bounds_check_2d.jl | 0.00% <0.00%> (ø) |
|
src/callbacks_stage/subcell_bounds_check.jl | 0.00% <0.00%> (ø) |
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Loading