ustc-proposal:0.0.1

[Freed-Wu]

I am submitting

• a new package
• an update for a package

Description: Explain what the package does and why it's useful.

I have read and followed the submission guidelines and, in particular, I

• selected a name that isn't the most obvious or canonical name for what the package does
• added a typst.toml file with all required keys
• added a README.md with documentation for my package
• have chosen a license and added a LICENSE file or linked one in my README.md
• tested my package locally on my system and it worked
• excluded PDFs or README images, if any, but not the LICENSE

• ensured that my package is licensed such that users can use and distribute the contents of its template directory without restriction, after modifying them through normal use.

[elegaanz]

Your template contains too many files that are not directly related to the project in my opinion. I understand that these files may be useful for power users, but I think for someone who doesn't use all these tools they will just feel like too much (especially in the web app where you can't really use any of that). Since I can see that you are using Nix, I would recommend using the flake template features to provide a "full" template (or alternatively the GitHub "repository template" feature), and to keep the Typst template as minimal as possible.

Also, I'm not sure what the purpose of the package is, but the name may too descriptive/generic. Please make sure to conform to the naming guidelines.

[typst-package-check]

@Robotechnic You released diagraph:0.3.0, so you probably want to have a look at this pull request. If you want this update to be merged, please leave a comment stating so. Without your permission, the pull request will not be merged.

[elegaanz]

Hello. With regards to the package name, I would like to know if this is intended to be an official template or not?

Also, the compiler reports an issue when building your template, can you please fix it?

[Freed-Wu]

it waits typst 0.13.0

Offical docx template doesn't have English name.

[elegaanz]

Sorry to ask for changes again, but can you fix the deprecation warnings too?

Regarding the name, I was more asking whether this package is considered official too, not what the name of the official Word template is. But I assume it is not then. Can you please rename the package to something more distinctive?